Recent content by aestu

So does that mean you are an underperformer relative to Feynman?

IQ of avg quantum physicist / quantum genius Nominal occurrence of said IQ in general population

As most everyone knows, we live in a four-dimensional universe. The fourth dimension, time, is inaccessible to us because the time variable is elastic relative to the continual expansion of the universe and human consciousness moves along it. A lesser-known scientific fact is that the number...

Hmm. In how many Asian games is the male protagonist not black-haired?

The Holocaust was a terrible, terrible thing - I myself have relatives that didn't make it - but the one millionth Holocaust movie or hearing the Israelis invoke the Holocaust as carte blanche for their own evil is not productive, it invites cynicism and devalues the significance of what...

So are we to take this as an admission of trolling?

To begin with - before all this political nonsense was manufactured - Lara Croft was a pair of unrealistically proportioned tits for the 15-year-old white boys who owned Playstation 1s. The game sucked, the character was vacuous, it was all about the tits, and for what it's worth it was...

This is actually an interesting question that made me think a bit. Do I think sexual exploitation exists? Yes, but I think that it exists because and not in spite of feminist efforts - and it is perpetrated by women, not men. The problem with the feminists is that they created the problem -...

This is a common interpretation but I don't agree with it. Consumerism is the value that deserves blame for social problems - but I don't agree that material disposability is the driving force. Rather, I believe, consumerism's message of "nothing should be difficult or require patience or...

No, but you'd be hard-pressed to plausibly argue it wasn't your intent. And if it truly wasn't then you're a tool. You are committing abuse by pulling a man's strings. Real people never do this. Flat out. Besides, the woman can always deny it later. So what good does this do?

If someone puts themselves in a sexually suggestive/available position, and has sex without objection, it is unreasonable for them to them to later insist that they did not want to have sex.

What the hell does this mean? So women who are forced to be attractive are the victims of "preoccupation", and the men who are attractive are "bleh"? I completely don't get what your point is, OP.

"When in doubt, deny all terms and definitions". It's also up to you to communicate in leetspeak or run around with your pants on your head, but don't expect anyone to take you very seriously. Your justification is incorrect anyway because you did not use "whereas" as a relative...

I know what you meant. I am pointing out that what you meant isn't logical. You are trying to claim that my claims or the terminology used to express those claims are offensive; I am pointing out that simply isn't true because what is said is benign.

Human beings are, by definition, animals. Animal populations with a broad genetic base are, all other things being equal, the hardiest and most viable.