Recent content by Cheeseless

There's a JRPG whose name i can't remember. It was 3D, you controlled(at least in the beginning) a single male character with a familiar. The world was apparently poisonous to everyone, so you had to carry around some sort of basin with water that created an aura where you didn't take damage...

I agree completely with this. Google seem to not be evil, or are being evil on an Amoeba Boys level. I'll trust most of them with my intertubes except for the adorable idiots who try to improve the Youtube layout all the time. That's the only thing they ever did that caused me any sort of...

200 euros. Getting me a Roccat Isku, a Razer Naga, and stuffing the reamaining cash into my debit card. For Steam.

Well, i'd say, following my previous post, offering it for scientific research is preferable to putting the child down. It'd still be possible for him to have a life, albeit not a normal one, which he wouldnt have anyways. So science, i think, is the best place for these cases, not death.

If it's been born, first offer it to scientific research. Then put it down. God this makes me feel bad.

I believe people are neither good nor bad, they are what they view themselves as wanting and so any outside judgement is useless. I am quite sure however that people can vary in whether they dance or not.

I hate it when characters don't act as would be at least common sense. When the actions make sense in hindsight i forgive it, but that only happens for 'genius' characters who are expected to do that.

If anything, i'd get into computers and stuff way sooner, use the math skills from the dream to get to highschool at 6, college degree at 12, rest of childhood spent gaming, develop super application everyone wants to buy, give money to Eliezer Yudkowsky, get super AI, live forever through its...

Quite simple: the Wiki game. Get to Hitler always, start at random, 300 rounds. I win.

The problem with trying to argue with you is that i agree with both sides of this argument and am trying to play the "devil's lawyer" (do you have that expression in English?) in order to try to get some final enlightenment out of the thread.

but what i meant was the shit gameplay was deliberate, you seemed to think it was accidental. Sorry if that wasn't it. In other news, This, completely. The game is awesome in every single respect. Story, gameplay, atmosphere, pie dispensing, brick-shitting-causing, etc, etc.

I can't agree with you opinion of Silent Hill: i think the game was brilliant BECAUSE the gameplay was shit. It was shit on purpose to give you a sense of fragility, enhance the atmosphere, adn keep you from moving fast enough to outrun the gameworld loading ;).

They do have more depth. They have the same pointing and clicking that TWD does, but the fact is, poiting and clicking in those games makes the little man on the screen do different stuff: either through making him perform different actions or having a different significance from the...

Heavy Rain is awesome because it accepts completely that's it's little more than a QTE-o-rama, which makes it more focused around steering the story by the player, like you said.

Predicting some flak here, when i say constraints i don't mean keeping people from mucking about, i mean keeping them from attempting what won't have any results at all besides what amounts to an error message. Imagine if point and click logic applied to first person shooters with open terrain...