Recent content by chekt

That's all the time you need for the bullet to pass through the lightsaber and into the jedi. :P But yea, it would cost more than firing the Heavy's minigun. You'd have to commit all your money to a jedi killer gun.

Ha ha, very funny. :P

Roddenberry was the reason why the crew doesn't argue in TNG. While he had a great vision of a peaceful earth, he was quick to dismiss things as not canon. Like if a TNG episode contradicted a TOS episode, he would make that part of the TOS episode not canon. It does sortof make sense, because...

The lightsaber would cut the steel and then be cut by the crotosis.

Also, the TOS numbers are all screwed up. According to them, warp 8.something is faster than warp 9 or higher. I wouldn't listen to that for numbers.

I don't think many people listen to the Roddenberry canon. He said that some of the TOS movies and the animated series were not canon. :\

Because if they did that, then Jedi wouldn't be able to deflect it with their lightsabers. ;) EDIT: And what the person below me said.

Garak, we both know that that wouldn't happen if the Star Destroyer had it's shields up. Also, Garak is one of the coolest people on DS9, next to Odo. :P

The holograms in Star Trek are crazy. They can kill people, if you turn the safety thing off. The ones in Star Wars are one color, and all static-y.

Also, the reason that is isn't Star Trek vs Star Wars vs Stargate is that Stargate and Star Trek both have a god race.

The lightsaber = win arguments make this seem more like a popularity contest than an actual argument.

http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Clone Um yea, you can clone in Star Trek.

The problem with these types of threads is that usually both sides are ignorant of the other, except for a few, but those few waste their time arguing with the ignorant ones. I know both the Star Trek and Star Wars universes (except for the expanded universe for both. I've seen most of The...