Couldn't EA advertised when they were making the "finished product" and not during the DLC production phase. Also it does look fishy that they were trying to keep their mouths shut about this DLC for day 1 announcement (if it wasn't leaked). Why wouldn't they have announced it earlier? Maybe...
Inexperinced poster alert. Points at me not to the person im relying to (I didn't quote properly
reply- I never said it was bad business for EA to do this. They are doing this because it is good business to make money. BUT! What I said was that it was unethical. Just like how I find DRM...
Might as well join this thread to give my two cents?
OK well I?m boycotting Mass Effect 3 not because I believe it?s the DLC is unfair but because EA is basically trying to use its position to strong arm consumers into buying more products and abusing its position.
BioWare wouldn?t make this...
I will take anyone on with this subject, Im an expert at arguing this, but i don't want to spam this question anylonger, message me and i will send you the details and the arguments at corkyjester@gmail.com (bring it, if you dare, come only if you are educated, no simple argument of oh its just...
THE USA DID WAIT FOR A SURRENDER NOTICE FROM JAPAN!!! they never did surrender so the USA dropped a 2ed, then Japan surrenderd, they could of surrenederd anytime they damn wanted to, but it took two bombs so its not overkill
hey better to end WW2 with NUKES and lose some lives then losing the world in the cold war THATS why they called it THE COLD WAR, nukes atually prevented the USA and the Solviet Union going to war with each other, you could say the USA helped the world alot more that day, shure its evil but hell...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.