Recent content by CraigGrannell

And Escapist will have to write a long, rambling article with loads of quotes from Langdell as link bait!

EA moves against Edge: http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=92051465&pty=CAN&eno=1

@FROGGEman2: Thanks for your informed and intelligent reply that completely ignores many of the facts, just like the article, in fact. @Bobbyskizza: Most sites wouldn't bother to report this? Really? At least 20 major sites ran this story before this one. @Armitage Shanks: I don't think...

I think this article proves they aren't. What a load of absolute fucking horseshit. Here's what they could have written: "We got it wrong - here's what we now know". Instead, this article hides behind "Ooh, lookie - new evidence!", using content DOZENS of other articles have already published...

This isn't the first time Langdell's tried the 'Bobby Bearing is nothing to do with Marble Madness' angle, and I know David Papazian's in touch with the original authors of BB, and so it would be relatively easy to get their take on when the game was started and what they based it on. (Note that...

"Wouldn't you think if Mobigames hadn't given them permission to publish, someone representing them would have asked the Escapist to take it down?" Maybe they did. Still, good to see that the initial stream of "The Escapist said it, so it MUST be true" has died down, replaced with a lot...

The fundamental problem with the article, as others have said, is what it leaves out and the manner in which it's written. It says Langdell made first contact and demanded money; it neglects to mention how that was done (in a very hostile manner, as shown by the previous poster) and then says...

I first reported on this spat a couple of months back on Cult of Mac and am astonished by this article. There's little point repeating what's already been said, but RobF and RevStu's comments on the previous page sum most things up. There is some misunderstanding regarding EDGY, however, that...