As someone who himself prefered the original trilogy to the pre-quel I thought Republic Commando felt like a different experience from either of them, it was a dark journey through the grittier parts of star wars warfare. From blood getting on your visor and awesome scripted hand-to-hand...
It's more of a star wars fan thing for myself to be honest. It did a good job of portraying the star wars universe from the point of a soldier fighting on the ground and not some idealized jedi or something. People into Star Wars games will respect it for its darker portrayal of war and...
Drive in "really" big circles and don't stop for anything if you want to live....... plus actually shooting the damn thing and all. On the bright side in Mass Effect 2 you get to give the ultimate humiliation to a thresher maw by killing it with small arms weapons.
Anyone who doesn't believe Star Wars Republic Commando deserves a real sequel has no taste in gaming. Personally I think George Lucas should make all the terrible books that followed it non-cannon and give the original developers freedom to continue the story as they please from where it was...
Considering that I owned a PS3 I can tell you with certainity that it lacks any good exclusive shooters. Killzone 2 is overrated (and the original is among the worst games made for the PS2). The fact that Sony wants their own Halo lookalike only reinforces the fact that they and their community...
Halo has started to become overrated, but to say one hates the games is a lie. The first two were great, Bungie just started to lose its way with the third. Most people who say they hate Halo have never played it because they own a Sony or Nintendo console and don't want to admit another console...
Worst movie ever "Funny Games" not funny at all, even with all the stupid cliches and otherplayed parts its just too boring and annoying to be anything other than terrible. I believe that it is the 'worst' movie I have ever seen (and I've seen some shit movies). The whole movie consists of the...
Thats an interesting point, although I believe it goes more along the lines of a joint operation rather than actual alliance. Where the difference between the two is sometimes hard to recognize, it appears that at first Australia joined on behalf of South Vietnam (alongside many other nations...
So think of me as taking the moral high road, I state we should not get involved in foriegn conflicts and that furthermore we should not make treaties to do so.
You seem to be in need of some history lessons my friend, the U.S. did not in itself benefit at all from Russian aid. Russia was an...
You are right, kinda. Russia was allied with Germany but only for the short term, both leaders suspected that their nations would have to go to war because of different beliefs. Russia was invaded and switched to the Allies in 1939 if I remember correctly. The U.S. didn't enter that war till 1941.
Your lack of reading skills are showing. I stated that the U.S. has never required the aid (or received aid) from her allies in conflicts actually involving the american nation within the last 100 years. The U.S. joined into a conflict that was pre-existing and helped those allies in the...
Actually he posted he was american, thus the rule of Napoleon and the 100 Years War means nothing to him, only to Britain. The Vichy French part still holds true, but to claim that half of the French population were in support of it is really pushing it in terms of what the actual popular French...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.