Recent content by HE Shaunshaun

i would, but i have over 120 results now and it would take me ages to filter and analyse them to put them on here. the best i can do (without compromising the results of future surveyors) is tell you percentages of answers to any of the questions asked. like around 60% bought games because...

yeah it is. i'm mainly tyring to look into how the amount of hours people play relates to what forms of marketing they afe affected by. i'm also trying to look at how hours played does not relate to how 'hardcore' you are as a gamer, but rather the dedication you have to games and the types of...

since there isn't a real definition for what a hardcore gamer is, i dont think anyone can be sure if they fit into the hardcore gamer category or not. well, apart from whoever put that they played 168 hours in an average week. but somehow, i dont believe them. thanks for the input.

Although we in the gaming community know that gaming can span all ages, sexes, races and pretty much every other barrier, others dont. part of my research was to show that those in the 16-21 and 22-30 categories arent the only ones who can be hardcore gamers and play for hours a day. so in a...

Nope, my name is shaun. Thought i made it obvious by repeating in in my name 'HE Shaunshaun'. thanks for doing my survey tho. :D

Didn't expect as many resonses as this, but lovely jubbly. Thanks yall. I know it's a little bit frustrating to not have a middle level between Hardcore and casual, but my research is about the differences between the 2 and i didnt want to give a middle option because it would just make it...

Hmm. the 'other' options were added by the survey builder and should work fine. i'll look into that. the option to go back and change answers is available (if that works) so if you want you can go back and deselect the answer it forced you to give. thanks for the replies and the info. *edit*...

Probably not going to get much here, but this was the only place i could think of. i've created a survey as part of some university work and was just wondering if some people could do it. It's about video games, only 8 questions long, and 7 of these are multiple choice...

their is a difference between being a human being higher ranked and being a super soldier. spartans were trained from birth to be war machines and also have masses of armour and shields. higher ranking officers however have none of this, but what they do have is that littl bit of extra skill and...

i think after ruby/sapphire the games should've stopped. this is purely because they added too many new pokemon and make getting/training them way too complex. i was once a huge pokemon fan but when i got pearl i finished it, then didnt even bother attempting to catch the rest of the pokemon...

maybe i phrased this all wrong then. what i was trying to say was is everyone sick of hearing about how awsm MW2 is, and are halo fans sick of the bashing they get because they play a game that is deemed unrealistic because it is set in the future.

i do this all the time and i dont know why. i guess is just mix up the two. i know when i have wrote it if i have spelt it correctly or not. ot: i hate it when english people spell colour as "color" yes i know it's the american spelling and you all believe thats how it's spelt, but not in...

i'm just wondering if anyone else is sick of hearing people say COD is better or Halo is better all the time. it's getting on my nerves and has been for a while now. no, this isn't a thread to start an argument on which you think is better. it's just for those who think everyone should stop...

basically, O.D.S.T is halo 3 but with a 2 hour campaign mode and an unreasonably easy one at that. it took me 2 days to finish the campaign on normal, then legendary. i then did most of the firefights and the vidmasters. so really, rent it, play it, hate it, go back to whatever else it is you...

tetris man. i freaking crapped myself. the shapes dude, THE SHAPES!!!1!1!!!!