Recent content by hemahemahema

The problem is, Hitler himself was a brave warring man (received the Iron Cross and no mistake!), and basicly what happened was we needed more brave warring men to cancel him out. So if brave warring men are such a nuisance, why don't we just get rid of them all together? What I am saying is...

If cowardice is a sign of lack of economic depression or wars, I don't see a problem. I think you have your priorities wrong. Self-righteous pussies do the world a lot less harm than brave warring men, even if the latter is more noble. It is a fact and there is nothing I don't like about this...

English, obv. Chinese is my first Language 死了都不卖

I think that Freedom of Speech is completely fair, as is Chaos. Fair in this case does not mean good or beneficial, it just means there is a equal chance for everyone. Like anything else, Freedom of Speech is a double edged sword and there is no point in deciding it is good or not - it could...

Why do we want a dog that's not male? Anyway who cares? Can you get Braid on PC-CD rom?

Come on, let's stop. Anyone know the answer to my Braid question?

Hey, someone's saying the right thing! Why can't you all listen to the man-man?

Only 34 posts to go, Let's just start talking about something else. Does anyone know if Braid has ever been released as PC-CD rom, or do you have to pay and download it?

Oh and just ONE LAST LAST LAST EFFORT to explain the Three Card Problem. It's all in the wording. You are shown on SIDE which is black. One side, not a card with a black side but one side. So if the cards are A, B and C, and they have sides A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 and C2, you have not seen the card...

Eat you heart out, Cheese_Pavilion! You thought you were the king of faulty logic but then this dude showed up and you got your paradoxical arse handed to you. Way to go Xanadu84!! Take his bottom! Oh and as for settling the solution with a drinking game, how about a Speed Pub Crawl? The...

Wow, you are actually a good logician. A slightly confused one though. Let's just start with the card example, for which your analogy had two errors. A), you equated p(1)'showing a black side' to p(2)'at least one is male' where 'black' is equivalent to 'male'. And your arguement is that...

Monty Hall problem, you should always switch to increase the odds from 33.33% to 66.66%, i.e. 1/3 to 2/3 think of it this way choose goat-switch-get car choose car-switch-get goat since you are more likely to start with a goat (2/3), you should always switch Yes it can. Think of it...

Wow, sorry. You understand it is a little bit difficult to keep up with some 900 posts.

Wow, we are determined to reach 1000 posts on this problem eh? anyway, it's ironic how lego been used as an example. By Cheeze_Pavilion. because, you know, a red lego stuck to a white one is actually different from a white one stuck to a red one R W and W R because of the...

so to start with there are mf, fm, mm and ff of equal probability at least 1 m brings us to fm, mf or mm, again of equal probability out of which for mm the other 1 is male, so 1/3 the counter arguement seems to be that fm=mf, so really there are just 3 equal possibilities to start with...