Recent content by King Zeal

Well, Morrigan is used more as a tease than an actor of sexuality. She's a character that essentially offers sex with almost every word or action, but that's it.

Nothing you have provided convinces me you are.

Yep. So basically, nothing will convince you. Peace. EDIT: Actually, there is one last thing bugging me. But we're not looking at those statistics from ''my'' perspective of it happening. These aren't statistics of likelihood--we aren't determining how likely this is to happen to...

But again, not all women are that way. So, you're making a special case. Okay, so what? If he was jiggling, he was jiggling. Bam. I just proved men do it, meaning it's not realistic. But this kind of screw your point over, because there are different types of bras. Some bras...

Five thousand people is "difficult to find"? Yeah, there's our disagreement right there. And five thousand still doesn't list the total amount of people--it's only the people in one year. So, if that trend continues, in a span of five years, that's about 25,000 people. And considering...

Because there's no point to it except to draw distinction to perkiness. If both were "jiggling" (which they weren't), you brought it up for no reason. Oh, so you agree that he was jiggling now? Those are sagging breasts, not what we're talking about here. Again, unless he wore...

That's really not the point. You started this asking me how often does this happen. Statistics say 6,222 times in one year, with 5,631 offenders. What is your disagreement now? And yet, it still happens. The difficulty of occurance is not evidence that it didn't occur. No it isn't...

"most of the more perky women's breast wear jiggling" - So what? Not all women's breasts are perky, so why make special circumstances? "they were walking slower than the man" - They weren't walking THAT much slower, and even when I showed girls running, they didn't move that much more. If...

LOL. Okay, so now your excuse is that you need a videogame physique. So again, you keep making these special circumstances for women (only perky breasts, only when walking fast, only videogame physiques) but because the man's "thighs are causing the jiggle, all of a sudden it doesn't count...

Nope. http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2012/december/annual-hate-crimes-report-released/annual-hate-crimes-report-released 6,222 in 2011 alone, with 20% being related to sexual orientation/gender, which means 1294. Whether you are not receptive to them or not does not disprove their...

We're done here. You don't even know what a "fact" is. If it's facts, show me statistics and sources. Show me expert testimony. And again, you're just making excuses. I don't know what your definition of "jiggling" means, but the man's junk had more movement than all but maybe ONE of...

I prove you wrong again, and you just come up with more excuses. So now your excuse is that the "perky women were jiggling" and that his thighs were "causing jiggle". So basically, common extenuating circumstances are fine for women (not all women are "perky"), but for some reason that doesn't...

And other bigots? Then in that case, an independent investigation would be needed to confirm this. To assume the information is "harmful" is to bias yourself against the people claiming discrimination. If people are claiming corruption, you can't say that the people publishing their...

A neo-nazi isn't an example of a hate criminal? Seriously? And if statistics, surveys, articles, and all the other evidence I've presented doesn't convince you, then I just don't think it's possible to convince you. This makes no sense. First, "implications" are subjective; we can't use...

Here you go. http://analogme.typepad.com/analog-me/2011/11/history-of-measurements.html...