Recent content by PdYyP1iWeJaWBnlafPe4

She's also a really smart info-sec expert ;-) https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity

Female privilege is not having rape definitions redefinited against you for the sake of statistics.

I kinda think you are a bit wrong in what you said, tbh. You cannot duplicate a human. You can easily duplicate data. Data is information, the representation on a medium differs, but it can be easily be replicated without loss of original. With humans (the physical world), it is impossible...

That's the thing. Anytime you say, "please don't post/upload things on the internet if you don't want it public" is met with, "that's victim blaming!" ... no, that's the reality of technology. I'm sorry whoever says, "that's victim blaming" does not understand just how fucking complicated...

This is my favorite take on it (btw this account is gold), src: https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/506290586609913857 Unfortunately, any attempt to educate is met with, "that's victim blaming" and when I hear that ... I just stop caring. I really do. I'll help other people...

If it's uploaded to the internet (encrypted or not), it's not "in your own home." It's on RAM and a hard drive in a server in a data-center in some region of the world. And as time goes on, it gets backed-up to another server or on magnetic tapes. And so on and so forth. This is why I...

*replied to wrong thread, ignore*

No, you see, I quoted your *original* post. I responded to your original post. My response was centered around NK and state-sponsored actors. Your additional paragraph (the 2nd paragraph), wasn't added until the edit which was after I had opened a new window to respond to. Your additional...

I responded to you as soon as I saw that post. I did not see the additional paragraph. I refreshed post reply and saw it. Then I responded. Don't distort facts please. Thanks.

Because you edited after the post. Come on here, let's be fair, ok? :-) I don't see how the $ amount has any relation. Foreign attacks can be brought up the chain of command from municipal to federal agencies with relation to foreign-sponsored attacks. I think we're talking past each...

Because you never asked about it. Would you like to make a question with regards to that?

Again, wrong. You assume there is only 1 action possible as a response, and that is hilariously misguided. * Why can multiple account access to financials be done over the internet for that company without more provisions? * And if it is a bank, as a consumer, I shouldn't care too much...

No. Not at all. What I am suggesting is that you can't account for different laws in a different country on a physical road in the same manner as on the internet with countries that don't have the same laws nor extradition treaties. I'm sorry the internet is global and I'm sorry we're not...

You're partly correct, imo (and it's only imo, so I could be totally wrong in your opinion). Drunk driving is usually a local issue (different countries have different legal limits). However, does every country have the same law with regards to access to servers or files? If not, why are we...

I own a car and a computer. The car is insured. The computer is not, but I do have my sensitive info encrypted and backed up to private & undisclosed accounts elsewhere. My point with what I said was *not* to shift blame *off of hackers*, but to remind people that they have a responsibility...