Recent content by Sanguine

"...are we really going to play their game?" Richard smiled at Ray's comment weakly. He thought to himself 'Well, if there are games, I suppose there at least are rules.' and said: "I suppose we have to, what choice to have have but play their game?

Richard's eyes darted from corner to corner, a cold sweat perched on his brow. This certainly was not his line of work "I wouldn't suppose anyone has any ideas?"

OOC: again, thanks for the response. Without wishing to be cynical, I'm probably going to try as hard as I can to create a character before I die again (first round last game) So any criticism of writing/character development is in all honesty really appreciated. That said, do feel free to...

OOC: Cheers, again sorry for breaking the good flow so far Wise, wise words. Though now that someone's said it, I feel so stupid that I didn't realize that I should have done it in the first place, damn you hindsight. FROM NOW ON!

OOC: I'm really sorry for this but I'm quite new to this kind of role playing, so if anyone could give me any general advice I'd really appreciate it. But as a general question, is it relevent to post your character's thoughts about a situation? Again, sorry for being such a noob EDIT...

"I'm terribly sorry to intrude, I thought I should introduce myself, Richard. A pleasure to meet you all, I don't suppose anyone would be kind enough to offer me a light?" OOC EDITspeech marks for speech, herp derp

I'd like to hope something like this: More likely this: Inconspicuous, easy to hide and pretty damn sharp. Useful, but only in the right hands Captcha: dalek asylum. Jesus Christ

I'm confused, so we ARE posting the secrets on this forum now?

If the Gods of fate will be kinder to me this round than the last, count me in. (Edited for secret)

Disturbed. Thoroughly, thoroughly disturbed. And perhaps a little proud. For a character to be real enough for someone to literally fall in love with it says quite a bit about the writer's ability to bring the character to life. That said, it seems likely that the writer's interpretation of...

I'm not entirely sure if lots of people are particularly picky about their choice of partner, or are simply confused by the term "deal breaker". OT: Cheating would be a no, and it wouldn't be very nice if she was very emotionally attatched to her opinions and also really eager to discuss...

If the discussions are trying to stop the pointless misogyny, that would seemingly imply that they aren't pointless. They might be useless, or ineffective, but they have a definite point.

Care to elaborate as to exactly where?

It that what he was implying? Because it seems to me that what he was implying was that some women dress up in particular costumes/ways for attentions sake. Which seems like a reasonable conclusion, especially because he goes on in the next paragraph to say that this is irrelevant because men do...

Good point. It would be unfair to lump these two categories into one malicious category, especially when they lack the malice that I'm ascribing to them. I take what I said back, thank you for clarification.