Recent content by Sharia

He never said he wouldn't buy said games, he only ever said he wouldn't buy them new anymore and instead get them second hand, which is fair enough.

Unfortunately, you're probabally right. You consider it a mess and and eyesore. The information displayed is an equally important part of the "actual game", and I'm sorry if you consider that "too much" information, but that's not going to apply to everyone. You've also said nothing to...

Not at all, I don't want to cast myself in that analogy at all if I can avoid it. It does makes sense though. In the hypothetical situation, I'm sure said person would not like to hear that maybe they just aren't cut out for said event, and, who's wrong here? Oh and by the way, your attempt...

You've provided nothing, all you've done is shown your opinions on certain thigns. It's like your average joe entering the London marathon and half way through trying to argue that it is too long. You can't automatically prove them wrong, but it highlights quite a bit all the same. I don't...

Tell me about it Even your prior response to me in this thread makes a hell of a lot more sense.

What a load of rubbish. I'm sorry, but I shudder to think what you consider good. Actually scrap it, you referred to the original game's UI as awkward. I really, really don't want to know.

Eyes on Me will likely always be my favourite.

I read the rest of the post, all I really saw was a conflict. You recognise there are situations where the argument is valid, but then call the argument itself entirely stupid. You seem to have this one sided view that almost everyone that uses the term is somehow unable to explain themselves...

Sorry, but it's not the experience I have. I find it's quite often appropriately applied, even if it does cover a broad number of things.

Wow, talk about going over the top... It's a useful term, like many, in order to sum up. It essentially means: simplified so as to be intellectually undemanding and accessible to a wide audience. If you wish someone to articulate or elaborate on how exactly it has done so, then you ask them.

Umm, of course it is a legitimate complaint, that is provided it has been used and aimed correctly. It sounds to me like you are taking just about every argument you have heard on the matter, and merging it all into one. I will admit though that the term has lost a fair bit of weight, but only...

Two very different games, aiming for different things. That's like saying that I can't rip a game apart for having a really bad story and delivering it poorly and then go on to praise Super Mario.

Oh, I really like the footage, don't get me wrong. It's still a rather baffling and disappointing statement to read though. It's like learning of a Silent Hill 1 remake but then reading that they are looking at Downpour and the success of RE6 for inspirational changes.

That's really disappointing.

I picked up Tokyo Mirage Sessions and Mighty No.9 on Friday and Adventures of Mana and Zero Time Dilemma this morning. The next games I want are this coming Friday: JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Eyes of Heaven and the English version of Star Ocean 5