This is exactly what I mean. If he would've said he liked the game very much and therefore gave it a perfect score that wouldn't have been a problem, even if he didn't point out the (apparent) flaws of the game. If the game was really objectively as bad as people say (since I haven't played DA)...
I think this is where the analogy fails. In a restaurant, the reviewer gets a different dish than you, so you could have a structurally wrong dish and the reviewer could've had a good one. But a game reviewer playes the exact same game you did, so he should point things out that are objectively...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.