The books are guilty pleasures for me. I won't retread the criticisms that have already been made, but I do have another to add: Paolini's thesaurus abuse and his habit of using odd sentence structure to make the phrases seem 'archaic'. In the end it usually just results in me having to read the...
It's like a double box of fail!
I'd like to add to my list of stupid:
- All religious people are naive imbeciles.
- All atheists are nihilists who think "We are nothing" and hate hope and goodness.
I would have no problem with creationists if they could just admit that their position is based entirely on faith. This is not the case however, as places like Ken Ham's Creation Museum demonstrate. They have no problem warping the findings of real scientists to fit their views or outright...
There is a huge difference between a creationist pastor and an evolutionary biologist. The pastor bases his beliefs on a single ancient book, whereas the biologist bases his beliefs on evidence and experimentation. Could the biologist POSSIBLY be lying and POSSIBLY have gotten his lies past peer...
"Americans THAT feel everyone in Europe owe them for their aide in WW2".
You changed where the 'that' was, which changed the whole meaning of the sentence.
Ever heard of peer review? Its how we identify the liars and call them on their lies.
Anyways, as someone who spends way too much time around the old 'atheism vs. theism' kind of discussions, I've got too many of these to count from both sides (As an atheist myself, I may be a bit biased...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.