In a rather heated debate with a female coworker the other day, the topic of physical attractiveness came up. When the fact that I like big(ger) breasts attached to a smaller bdoy came to light, she absolutely let into me, calling me all sorts of things, the least of which was not "shallow".
This, being the thinker I am, got me to well, thinking. What causes such outrage at the idea that one prefers one kind of body over another, or one kind of body part over another.
It seems that the problem lies not in the actual thought or body, but the amount of control a person has over it. For example, while I could go to the gym and get a nice, toned body (I won't, mind you. Books to be read, games to be played), I could not go to the gym and make my penis bigger. I would have to be born with it, or go a surgeon for that. A woman similarly can go to gym to get obtain a more fit body, but then they cannot make their bust bigger there (quite to the contrary, they'd be likely to make it smaller.). They too would have to go to a surgeon, or be born with it.
Which caused a thought to strike me:
Perhaps its not the actual body that is what is offending - its when its based on things that person cannot control that does the offending. Would somone be as offended if they could do something about it that didn't involve major surgery and risk?
Or am I overthinking it, and its still just being a shallow ass thing?
This, being the thinker I am, got me to well, thinking. What causes such outrage at the idea that one prefers one kind of body over another, or one kind of body part over another.
It seems that the problem lies not in the actual thought or body, but the amount of control a person has over it. For example, while I could go to the gym and get a nice, toned body (I won't, mind you. Books to be read, games to be played), I could not go to the gym and make my penis bigger. I would have to be born with it, or go a surgeon for that. A woman similarly can go to gym to get obtain a more fit body, but then they cannot make their bust bigger there (quite to the contrary, they'd be likely to make it smaller.). They too would have to go to a surgeon, or be born with it.
Which caused a thought to strike me:
Perhaps its not the actual body that is what is offending - its when its based on things that person cannot control that does the offending. Would somone be as offended if they could do something about it that didn't involve major surgery and risk?
Or am I overthinking it, and its still just being a shallow ass thing?