Anonymous Sends a Letter to the World

Recommended Videos

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
I was checking my twitter feed when this [http://anonops.blogspot.com/] came up . In-case Blogspot takes it down before you read it here's the text.

A Letter from Anonymous
Our Message, Intentions, and Potential Targets

"Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves."
- Abraham Lincoln

"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither."
? Benjamin Franklin

Hello World. We are Anonymous. What you do or do not know about us is irrelevant. We have decided to write to you, the media, and all citizens of the free world at large to inform you of the message, our intentions, potential targets, and our ongoing peaceful campaign for freedom.

"True, This! ?
Beneath the rule of men entirely great,
The pen is mightier than the sword. Behold
The arch-enchanters wand! ? itself a nothing! ?
But taking sorcery from the master-hand
To paralyse the Cæsars, and to strike
The loud earth breathless! ? Take away the sword ?
States can be saved without it!"

- The Cardinal
Richelieu; Or the Conspiracy by: Edward Bulwer-Lytton

The message is simple: Freedom of Speech. Anonymous is peacefully campaigning for Freedom of Speech everywhere in all forms. Freedom of Speech for: The Internet, for journalism and journalists, and citizens of the world at large. Regardless of what you think or have to say; Anonymous is campaigning for you.
The recent news of our campaigns has been, at best, misinformed. Anonymous is not always the same group of people. The Constitution of the United States is said to be a living document, because it can be edited, amended; changed at the will of the people to suit the peoples' needs. In that same vein, Anonymous is a living idea. Anonymous is an idea that can be edited, updated, remanded, changed on a whim. We are living consciousness. We are not a terrorist organization as governments, demagogues, and the media would have you believe. At this time Anonymous is a consciousness focused on campaigning peacefully for Freedom of Speech. We ask the world to support us, not for our sake, but for your own. When governments control freedom they control you. The Internet is the last bastion of freedom in this evolving technical world. The Internet is capable of connecting us all. When we are connected we are strong. When we are strong we have power. When we have power we are able to do the impossible. This is why the government is moving on Wikileaks. This is what they fear. They fear our power when we unite. Do not forget this.

"...Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men."
- Monsignor, Boondock Saints

Anonymous' intentions are very clear. We are not vigilantes, regardless of the sentiment of quoting Boondock Saints, we are people on a campaign for freedom. Anonymous' intentions are to change the current way the governments of the world and the people view true Freedom of Speech and The Internet. Anonymous is willing, ready, and able to campaign for the freedom for all. We are campaigning right now as you read the news, watch the television, fight with your
significant other, love your children, hate your neighbor, criticize the man or woman next to you. We are campaigning. The goal is simple: Win the right to keep the Internet free of any control from any entity, corporation, or government. We will do this until our, proverbial, dying breath. We do this not only for our selves, but for the world and its people at large.

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies."
- Ron Paul

Pay attention citizens, governments, and the world. Anonymous' peaceful campaign will focus on any organization, corporation, government, or entity until the Internet is truly free.
Anonymous is doing what many successful campaigns have done in the past; a sit-in. It may be hard to comprehend, but a digital sit-in is our most effective method to show that all of us deserve Freedom of Speech and a free Internet. Our methods may appear, on the outside, to be cruel to those the entities that we are campaigning against, but remember buy supporting censorship they are denying everyone a basic human right. Any person, corporation, government, or miscellaneous entity that stops supporting censorship and starts promoting Freedom of Speech and a free Internet will become our allies. Anonymous, at this time, wants to persuade our counterparts rather than hurt them. We are campaigning for freedom for everyone, even the opposing side.
Do not fear us. Anonymous' campaign does not intend to harm the individual citizen, any organizations, any websites, or government, that supports true freedom of speech. Anonymous' past is not our present. We are here for all of you; to campaign for all of you. Where others have made this promise and failed; we make this promise and aim to keep it for everyone.
Anything attributed, credited, or tagged to Anonymous is not always what we do. We arenot always the same consciousness on a yearly, monthly, or even hourly basis. Do not believe everything you hear or read on the news. Anonymous is often credited with actions that are not campaigned for by Anonymous. The true core of Anonymous is here to help the free world for now. Anonymous wishes to represent the truth and ask that you as a citizen, media organization, or government do the same.

So what's the current stance from my fellow escapists on Anon's actions?
 

WolfEdge

New member
Oct 22, 2008
650
0
0
Seems kinda... pretentious to me. I wonder what the average age of the people responsible for the document are...

Or if it's entirely one person.
 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
Anonymous has been and always will be for freedom of exchange of information. Exchange of information is what they thrive on and what they feed off of in order to survive. The fact that they view recent actions against WikiLeaks as a threat is unsurprising.
 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
WolfEdge said:
Seems kinda... pretentious to me. I wonder what the average age of the people responsible for the document are...

Or if it's entirely one person.
It doesn't matter with Anon. Even if only one person put this document up, their actions of late denote multiple people.
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
Ehh, they'll get bored soon enough and crawl back to their troll caves to hibernate until the next hot button controversy crops up where it looks like something big is attacking something small so they can play superhero.

It was cool and kinda funny when they went after Scientology, but now its just kinda...I dunno redundant and unimaginative considering the best they seem to be able to do is denial of service attacks.
 

Chamale

New member
Sep 9, 2009
1,345
0
0
SL33TBL1ND said:
"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither."
? Benjamin Franklin
This is the slogan of our anti-ID campaign at school. We have the same ideals about freedom, it seems.

So what's the current stance from my fellow escapists on Anon's actions?
First, I think they should have proofread a little more.

Second, I think that Anonymous sounds like it's about to do some good in the world. Considering their track record, I still don't trust Anonymous, but when they say something like this it makes me want to.

I agree, as a matter of basic principle, that freedom is a fundamental right. This right is necessary for the enjoyment of all other rights (and today is UN Human Rights Day). If Anonymous is planning to fight for freedom, I will agree with their principles if not their methods.
 

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
Naheal said:
WolfEdge said:
Seems kinda... pretentious to me. I wonder what the average age of the people responsible for the document are...

Or if it's entirely one person.
It doesn't matter with Anon. Even if only one person put this document up, their actions of late denote multiple people.
With the thousands of LOIC's online I tend to agree with you there.
 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
Chamale said:
Second, I think that Anonymous sounds like it's about to do some good in the world. Considering their track record, I still don't trust Anonymous, but when they say something like this it makes me want to.

I agree, as a matter of basic principle, that freedom is a fundamental right. This right is necessary for the enjoyment of all other rights (and today is UN Human Rights Day). If Anonymous is planning to fight for freedom, I will agree with their principles if not their methods.
I would like to point out that judging Anon on their previous actions isn't necessarily a good idea. Anon now is not the same Anon of ten minutes ago, nor will it be the same Anon ten minutes for now.

That said, lack of trust is still a good idea.

SL33TBL1ND said:
Naheal said:
WolfEdge said:
Seems kinda... pretentious to me. I wonder what the average age of the people responsible for the document are...

Or if it's entirely one person.
It doesn't matter with Anon. Even if only one person put this document up, their actions of late denote multiple people.
With the thousands of LOIC's online I tend to agree with you there.
Anonymous is never one person. Ever. Get that out of your head whenever you hear about Anon doing anything at all. When someone speak with the title of "Anonymous", they speak as one voice of the whole, but they don't represent the whole. It's a confusing mass if you try to analyze it as one group, but, whether individual poster or mass of hackers, they function as a single being, ironically, because of their lack of organization.
 

Nimcha

New member
Dec 6, 2010
2,383
0
0
I think it's insanely hypocritical to hide behind 'Anonymous' and demand others to give up every little bit of information they want.

Besides that, I'm getting very tired of this WikiLeaks hype.
 

Engarde

New member
Jul 24, 2010
776
0
0
I am not well informed enough to comment on the wikileaks situation, but in response to their letter, they do put some effort into coming across as nice this time. And as someone has mentioned, they tend to change alot, and I do not doubt that it is a they, not he/she.

I am still hesitant to trust them however, as others above have stated, not the best track record.
 

Bon_Clay

New member
Aug 5, 2010
744
0
0
Naheal said:
Chamale said:
Second, I think that Anonymous sounds like it's about to do some good in the world. Considering their track record, I still don't trust Anonymous, but when they say something like this it makes me want to.

I agree, as a matter of basic principle, that freedom is a fundamental right. This right is necessary for the enjoyment of all other rights (and today is UN Human Rights Day). If Anonymous is planning to fight for freedom, I will agree with their principles if not their methods.
I would like to point out that judging Anon on their previous actions isn't necessarily a good idea. Anon now is not the same Anon of ten minutes ago, nor will it be the same Anon ten minutes for now.

That said, lack of trust is still a good idea.
Exactly, while you can generally expect anything labeled as by "anonymous" to have similar traits, who and how many people are behind it will vary greatly. Both the amount initially involved and those that stay interested or join later. The majority of the time people just stop caring and move after not too long and it fizzles out. But you never know, the potential power and influence of large groups of people with tons of time on their hands is pretty great, any day something substantial could be accomplished. It just isn't very likely.

Nimcha said:
I think it's insanely hypocritical to hide behind 'Anonymous' and demand others to give up every little bit of information they want.

Besides that, I'm getting very tired of this WikiLeaks hype.
Well there is a big difference between people's personal information, and the dealings of politicians who are making laws that can and do control how you live your life. That's not to say that any information leak regarding politics and government is good, I haven't read enough to really make a call on wikileak's recent controversy.
 

thahat

New member
Apr 23, 2008
973
0
0
Naheal said:
Chamale said:
Second, I think that Anonymous sounds like it's about to do some good in the world. Considering their track record, I still don't trust Anonymous, but when they say something like this it makes me want to.

I agree, as a matter of basic principle, that freedom is a fundamental right. This right is necessary for the enjoyment of all other rights (and today is UN Human Rights Day). If Anonymous is planning to fight for freedom, I will agree with their principles if not their methods.
I would like to point out that judging Anon on their previous actions isn't necessarily a good idea. Anon now is not the same Anon of ten minutes ago, nor will it be the same Anon ten minutes for now.

That said, lack of trust is still a good idea.

SL33TBL1ND said:
Naheal said:
WolfEdge said:
Seems kinda... pretentious to me. I wonder what the average age of the people responsible for the document are...

Or if it's entirely one person.
It doesn't matter with Anon. Even if only one person put this document up, their actions of late denote multiple people.
With the thousands of LOIC's online I tend to agree with you there.
Anonymous is never one person. Ever. Get that out of your head whenever you hear about Anon doing anything at all. When someone speak with the title of "Anonymous", they speak as one voice of the whole, but they don't represent the whole. It's a confusing mass if you try to analyze it as one group, but, whether individual poster or mass of hackers, they function as a single being, ironically, because of their lack of organization.
funny issent it? if you think about it, they have got the fairest way of 'government' over thmselves, since no one realy has leverage, and shit only happens when people agree, or if at least some agree and enough trolls can be set loose XD
 

SnootyEnglishman

New member
May 26, 2009
8,308
0
0
Eh i don't bother with this stuff..when broken down it's all about politics and that's something that just confuses the everloving hell out of me and at times downright pisses me off.
 

thahat

New member
Apr 23, 2008
973
0
0
Nimcha said:
I think it's insanely hypocritical to hide behind 'Anonymous' and demand others to give up every little bit of information they want.

Besides that, I'm getting very tired of this WikiLeaks hype.
oh yes, tell the big bad government your name surname and place of residence!
and them tell them to be open like you, thats SO going to work. just like voting that works! /not.
the only way you can get any gyant scale corporation to do ANYTHING ( and yes, a government is nothing but a big company, even though they dont get that at the lower levels of said government because government officials are idiots. ) is to make them feel it where it hurts.
and when you do that when your entire identity is up for grabs. how long do you think it will take for them to have you in a cell somewhere?
 

Nimcha

New member
Dec 6, 2010
2,383
0
0
thahat said:
Nimcha said:
I think it's insanely hypocritical to hide behind 'Anonymous' and demand others to give up every little bit of information they want.

Besides that, I'm getting very tired of this WikiLeaks hype.
oh yes, tell the big bad government your name surname and place of residence!
and them tell them to be open like you, thats SO going to work. just like voting that works! /not.
the only way you can get any gyant scale corporation to do ANYTHING ( and yes, a government is nothing but a big company, even though they dont get that at the lower levels of said government because government officials are idiots. ) is to make them feel it where it hurts.
and when you do that when your entire identity is up for grabs. how long do you think it will take for them to have you in a cell somewhere?
I do not want the goverment to do anything. Just be there when I need it and leave me alone otherwise. Whatever else they do is not my concern.
 

fgdfgdgd

New member
May 9, 2009
692
0
0
Chamale said:
Second, I think that Anonymous sounds like it's about to do some good in the world. Considering their track record, I still don't trust Anonymous, but when they say something like this it makes me want to.
The track record of getting pedophile and animal abusers arrested, or the trolling or self important people and the foul sense of humour that's almost entirely contained to their forums?

Please read these.
 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
This belongs here, since people don't seem to have a clue about Anon.

 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
Xzi said:
WolfEdge said:
Seems kinda... pretentious to me. I wonder what the average age of the people responsible for the document are...

Or if it's entirely one person.
Yea, it seems the writer has quite the dramatic touch, eh? Seems as if he's a rabid fan of the movie "V for Vendetta." XD

That being said, what matters is the message, and not necessarily the manner in which it is presented. I do fully support the things that they're claiming as their current objectives...now let's see where they actually go with them.

EDIT: Lol never mind, forgot that these guys DO enjoy wearing V masks.
If you're essentially untraceable and have something major planned, wouldn't you?