Another Crappy Review by the Irate Gamer - Sonic Unleashed Review

[qwmn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUR6cpxsJ4Y

Proof that most people who give negative reviews for Sonic Unleashed don't play past the first area.

 

[Limasol]

Surely its "proof" that the negative reviews are about the later stages.He says the first two stages are good, then it gets bad.

 

[sneak_copter]

Surely its "proof" that the negative reviews are about the later stages.He says the first two stages are good, then it gets bad.

No. The only good parts are right at the end, when you finally turn it off and end the pain.

Edit: This looks like it might be snapped up by The Escapist, like every other YouTuber ever.

 

[qwmn]

Surely its "proof" that the negative reviews are about the later stages.He says the first two stages are good, then it gets bad.

All the stages he mentioned were in the first section of the game.

Besides, the flying stages only happen twice in the game, and there are more Hedgehog stages than the 2 he mentioned.

 

[Ken Korda]

How do you know he didn't play all of it? He only showed the first few levels but that doesn't mean he didn't play the whole thing

 

[qwmn]

How do you know he didn't play all of it? He only showed the first few levels but that doesn't mean he didn't play the whole thing

If he played all of it, he would've shown more than just the first section (there are 7 sections in all, and he only showed the first).

 

[cartooner2008]

Who the hell watches the Irate Gamer, anyway? I've never liked him.

 

[Eclectic Dreck]

How do you know he didn't play all of it? He only showed the first few levels but that doesn't mean he didn't play the whole thing

If he played all of it, he would've shown more than just the first section (there are 7 sections in all, and he only showed the first).

Your logic is flawless and cannot be debated.

Except the simple fact that I can think of any of a number of reviews that don't mention every stage in a game. Actually, that would be almost every review I've ever come across.

So the man clearly didn't like the game. He posted it on the internet, which automatically destroyes his credibility anyway. Given that reviews are inherently subjective, you really don't have any ground to stand on complaining he did it wrong unless you can point to factual errors in his argument. I for example cannot stand Metal Gear Solid (any of them), I hate almost everything about them. It doesn't mean my position should mean anything to anyone else in the world - it just means I don't like it.

 

[Abedeus]

Who the hell watches the Irate Gamer, anyway? I've never liked him.

Bye bye.

I like his reviews. I mean, not because of the merit values, but he's like Yahtzee. Only posts reviews a bit less often.

 

[rottenbutter]

I actually liked it. I thought it summed up what was wrong with Sonic Unleashed pretty well.

 

[ninjitsubob]

Who the hell watches the Irate Gamer, anyway? I've never liked him.

lol no one.

 

[The Infamous Scamola]

The guy's a hack, an AVGN ripoff and doesnt even finish the games he reviews.