I understand the appeal and love of classic games being myself a regular retro gamer; however I am concerned with the constant reoccurrence on top [insert number here] lists. They are inspirational games that are landmarks in the industry such as space invaders and pong but honestly if given the choice would you pick them over modern day counterparts, if so why do the reappear on such lists they could get an honourable mention. They are by today?s standards not the best and holding them as such due to their age in my eyes is unfair to modern titles.
Edit: If you misunderstand the post I apologise however the point I am question attempting to make is that is it right to count a game as great to play due to an effect it had in the past.
Edit: If you misunderstand the post I apologise however the point I am question attempting to make is that is it right to count a game as great to play due to an effect it had in the past.