This is really starting to get to me.
For a supposedly progressive, forward thinking company Valve is really not being an industry leader in terms of pricing, for example let's take Steam's pricing for Far Cry 3:
Then lets take another website which shall remain unnamed for fear of advertising reasons:
Now, granted, this is just one example and Steam sales for older games do demolish physical copy game sales, however when it comes to big AAA releases, shouldn't Steam be releasing a price that is a reasonable alternative for a physical copy?
Incase you didn't do the math there is a $16.5 difference between a physical copy of a new game (which is posted for free), and an entirely digital copy of a new game, and the physical copy is the cheaper one. It strikes me as madness, the only real advantage then to buy these games from Steam is the time delay, and if you are willing to pay $16.5 extra to get the game immediately and don't care about the physical copy, well I guess we just differ on our fundamentals.
So, thoughts? Should Steam be charging this much? Is this high cost really hurting them, or the consumer? Are the Steam prices for Far Cry 3 different in America? If not, then why buy AAA games from Steam?
EDIT: Oh. Crap, I just compared the price of an Xbox360 game to a PC game... But wait, what? The price of the unnamed website's Far Cry 3 PC edition is actually $43.99? So that makes it better than Steam by $26? What in the hell?
For a supposedly progressive, forward thinking company Valve is really not being an industry leader in terms of pricing, for example let's take Steam's pricing for Far Cry 3:

Then lets take another website which shall remain unnamed for fear of advertising reasons:

Now, granted, this is just one example and Steam sales for older games do demolish physical copy game sales, however when it comes to big AAA releases, shouldn't Steam be releasing a price that is a reasonable alternative for a physical copy?
Incase you didn't do the math there is a $16.5 difference between a physical copy of a new game (which is posted for free), and an entirely digital copy of a new game, and the physical copy is the cheaper one. It strikes me as madness, the only real advantage then to buy these games from Steam is the time delay, and if you are willing to pay $16.5 extra to get the game immediately and don't care about the physical copy, well I guess we just differ on our fundamentals.
So, thoughts? Should Steam be charging this much? Is this high cost really hurting them, or the consumer? Are the Steam prices for Far Cry 3 different in America? If not, then why buy AAA games from Steam?
EDIT: Oh. Crap, I just compared the price of an Xbox360 game to a PC game... But wait, what? The price of the unnamed website's Far Cry 3 PC edition is actually $43.99? So that makes it better than Steam by $26? What in the hell?