Authors You Hate

Recommended Videos

Dancingman

New member
Aug 15, 2008
990
0
0
Got this idea from a rather angry blog post in which some dude attacked a lot of the authors who write in the Forgotten Realms series (Ed Greenwood and R.A. Salvatore). Anyway, post up about authors you don't like.

Christopher Paolini: Awarded the top slot on my list not just because his books are garbage, but because he and his fanbase scream like howler monkeys at people who dare to criticize his series. I started the Inheritance Cycle in 7th Grade, and thus was far too young to recognize glorified fan fiction when I saw it. Although I found his constant stream of big words that, in retrospect, reflected gross overuse of a thesaurus, to be a tad befuddling, I progressed through the first book that, unbeknownst to me, was the same plot of an obscure (hee hee, internet sarcasm) film from the 70's known as Star Wars. From what I remember, Eragon was decent enough, utterly cliche, containing the font of Mary-Sueness that was Eragon, and filled with that trademark verbosity from Paolini, but ultimately a mediocre read. It got much worse with Eldest, whereas Eragon was of an acceptable length for a book not written by an author I didn't absolutely worship, Eldest was a doorstopper that, to paraphrase Yahtzee "could be used to beat goats to death with." At my time of reading it, Eldest was just confusing and tedious to read, but looking back on it, I realize that Paolini was also using it as a vehicle for his personal values, something that, when done to excess, is a guaranteed buzzkill for most. His atheist, vegetarian elves existed to prove people Paolini disagreed with wrong, and were second only to Eragon in terms of sheer Mary-Sueness. Paolini's homespun "Ancient Language" which he often bills as something along the lines of Klingon in terms of development of a fictional language, was explored in enormous detail throughout Eldest, though we got maybe 10 or so more words out of it; oh yes, quite the developed language indeed. Eragon also started along his route of bawling like a child at something (i.e. feeding on the lifeforce of a few small organisms to fuel one's magical power) and then becoming an emotionless machine at something much worse (using magic to kill legions of hapless soldiers). After reading those first two as a young'un and still failing to realize that they were garbage, I got Brisingr when it came out and finally realized that the niggling little doubts I'd always had about the series had been right all along. Suddenly, I saw once interesting characters and stories for the cliched, tedious things they really were. I realized the character derailment that occured for no reason other than to spice up the plot: the mentoring dragon acting like an infatuated schoolgirl, the aloof elf princess becoming some petty Greek goddess, the child cursed to forever feel the suffering of others spending the whole series bemoaning her fate and then denying the hero's offer to heal her condition, and the evil henchman of the series becoming the only sane man left in a world of retarded Mary-Sues and Strawman characters.

R.A. Salvatore: In an unusual feat for my normally slow and steady reading pace, I polished off the entire Dark Elf Trilogy in about three weeks. The majority of it got done while I was staying at some cabin in the middle of bloody nowhere whilst on vacation. One bone I have to pick with Salvatore reflects his unnecessarily drawn-out combat scenes. Everything about them seems to be trying to tell me that the author cares deeply about realism in combat; and yet he doesn't spend even a single sentence defending Drizzt's use of two full-sized scimitars (dual-wielding) in combat? Normally I let my sense of disbelief take a hike for fantasy, but when the author tries to convince me of realism and fails at it, there's a little red light that goes on in my brain. I also tend to dislike fantasy that doesn't challenge my perceptions of things, when the characters are black & white, saintly, orphanage-building good and dog-kicking, fiendishly evil, I simply find something better to occupy my time.

Also, I treat books with a reverence that is usually reserved for religious occasions, and it's always my thought that even if I don't like a book that I can give it to someone who will, however, Brisingr and the Dark Elf Trilogy (the big book that encompasses all three of the books) are to this day, the only books I've ever thrown away, maybe they can be recycled into something useful.

Question: Why was the title of this topic changed by someone who wasn't me?
 

Kuchinawa212

New member
Apr 23, 2009
5,408
0
0
Ah that's easy

Just about everyone in the Black Libery except Dan Abnett
He's amazing everyone else is meh
 

darthzew

New member
Jun 19, 2008
1,813
0
0
Stephanie Meyer...

but being serious, I hate Amy Tan. Everything I've ever read by her is about a Chinese girl having problems with her mother.
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
Christopher Paolini, for reasons that any sane person already figured out;
J.K. Rowling, because of the death list in The Deathly Hallows (although the others were good);
Johnathan Stroud, for the cockslap ending of The Bartimeus Trilogy;
George Orwell, for 1984 and Animal Farm;
Myself (H.T. Black), for not having cinched that deal with Dark Horse yet (Blatent advertising).
 

IrrelevantTangent

New member
Oct 4, 2008
2,424
0
0
Normally, I'd mention Stephanie Meyer, but L Ron Hubbard shouldn't be overlooked as one of the worst writers of all time as well. His writings inspired what's considered today to be a dangerous cult, and his books are generally just a mix of quasi-philisophical gibberish and snippets of weird sci-fi elements.
 

Hephaesto

New member
Mar 25, 2009
42
0
0
Dan Brown, for the love of God! No Pun intended, Dan Brown.

It attempts to be so freaking clever, but everyone that reads those books can always bust the riddles within half a second of reading them, while Tom Hanks (I've forgotten the character's name) bums around for 5 fecking chapters scratching his head like a brain dead neanderthal.

That and the formula for his books is exactly the same for each one.

Dude meets girl, girl has problem, meets confident, evil person appears, turns out the confident is evil, turns out the evil guy was being used, confident/real evil guy is foiled thereby solving girl's problem, dude bags girl.

This was the exact formula used for Angels & Demons, it was a test run to see if he could create a page turner, it worked. So then he just copies and pastes the same page turning, 3 page to a chapter formula and added some controversial subject matter pilfered from more talented authors and the Da Vinci Code was born.
 

Ultress

Volcano Girl
Feb 5, 2009
3,377
0
0
Kate Cary, wrote an unofficial sequel to Dracula that played out like a bad fan fiction with the diary entry style writing, witch I despise .
 

Harlemura

Ace Defective
May 1, 2009
3,327
0
0
Jane Austen, all she's done is teach me that "a wonderful classic" means "dull as a rock".
But she's dead now so I shouldn't keep on at hating her in case she comes to haunt me.
 

Ravenseeker

New member
Jan 11, 2009
218
0
0
HT_Black said:
Christopher Paolini, for reasons that any sane person already figured out;
J.K. Rowling, because of the death list in The Deathly Hallows (although the others were good);
Johnathan Stroud, for the cockslap ending of The Bartimeus Trilogy;
George Orwell, for 1984 and Animal Farm;
Myself (H.T. Black), for not having cinched that deal with Dark Horse yet (Blatent advertising).

agree with Stroud and himself, Rowling is ok at times, and Paolini because of his characters
also Meyers, Dan Brown, Charles Dickens, and Mark Twain
 

Kailias

New member
Mar 11, 2009
162
0
0
KneeLord said:
Stephenie Mayer
L Ron Hubbard ... (echoing the_oracle's sentiments)

HT_Black said:
George Orwell, for 1984 and Animal Farm;
Jeez, I like Orwell. You've obviously got some strong feelings on his writing, do you mind if I ask what it is that you find rubs you the wrong way? If his political views don't sit well with you, I'd understand, but in terms of narrative structure and compelling communication of his ideas, I feel like those are both master pieces.

But, hey, tastes are subjective. All the same, I'm curious what your contention with Orwell is, if you don't mind sharing. I won't jump down your throat or anything. Just left me *headscratching*
I agree, out of all the works I had to read for school this past year Animal Farm stuck with me more than any. I actually went out and bought a copy after borrowing it from the library. The last few lines especially caught me. I love it when the authors last words in a story hold metaphorical meaning and directly deal with the title and theme.

I'd also like to know what the first poster has against Orwell. If you wouldn't mind, do you have any recommendations for other books? I know there was one other Orwell wrote that was supposed to be good.
 

Xanadeas

New member
Oct 19, 2008
689
0
0
HT_Black said:
Christopher Paolini, for reasons that any sane person already figured out;
J.K. Rowling, because of the death list in The Deathly Hallows (although the others were good);
Johnathan Stroud, for the cockslap ending of The Bartimeus Trilogy;
George Orwell, for 1984 and Animal Farm;
Myself (H.T. Black), for not having cinched that deal with Dark Horse yet (Blatent advertising).
I too hate George Orwell for writing 1984. Freaking hated that book especially since it was a mandatory read in high school.

I can't really think of any others aside from Stephanie Myers. I haven't read Twilight but frankly I hate her for creating it. I watched the first movie and now I have to watch the others because the second supposedly has a good werewolf transformation scene. DX