Freddy vs. Jason vs. Satan, with occult overtones and a darker mid-nineties edge to it? Count me in. The reviewer didn't like it, but I did, mainly because it was a completionist story that accounted for all of the movies in both series. And the aforementioned Darker Nineties Edge: I love movies like that, and I hate the jokey PG-13 shitfest Ronnie Yu eventually made.Of all the would-be scripts turned down before the studio found the proper one for Freddy Vs. Jason this 1995 take by Peter Briggs is the most ambitious. Perhaps a bit too ambitious, as it turns out it's a bit confusing for those who don't follow theology.
The script starts with a prologue in 17th century Italy where a witch hunter and a dignitary each use a pair of Byzantine blades (exactly like the one used to defeat Jason Voorhees in Jason Goes To Hell) to defeat a demonic force that was summoned by a necromancer. The blades, the only weapons capable of defeating such a monster, were ?forged by the alchemists of Atlantis from the blade that pierced the side of Christ.?
Already, we're mixing mythology and theology up in a frothy brew.
As the dark force is returning to its home in hell, he promises to come back when time reaches its close.
Flash forward to December 31, 1999. We're in neutral territory here, the small town of Bethlehem, Virginia. The world is fast falling apart around us, literally going to hell in a hand basket. A millennium cult sacrifices a young girl to a pagan god in an old book store and conjures up a familiar visage: Jason Voorhees. He promptly kills off the cultists and then takes his spree to the streets.
But there is a more karmic force at work here as well.
After Steven Freeman and Jessica Voorhees sent Jason to hell 8 years ago, they got married, became a real family with their child, and started a small automotive repair business in Bethlehem. On this particular night, Steven gets a call from a woman having a little roadside trouble. When he shows up to fix the car, it belongs to none other than Alice Johnson and her young son Jacob (last seen in Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child), who were just passing through. The car is going to take a day to fix, so Steven offers the Johnson's shelter in his home. Unbeknownst to each other, both families have had their fair share of dealings with supernatural killers.
Meanwhile, an FBI agent receives a package from the Vatican containing files on both Alice Johnson and Jessica Freeman. Not quite sure what the package means, he and his partner travel to Virginia to speak to Jessica and are surprised to find that Alice is there as well, purely by chance. Together they all sit down to try and sort out the mess. But soon Jason shows up, slicing and dicing as usual.
Jason wreaks his usual carnage and kidnaps Steven and the kids. Taking them back to the bookstore where he was summoned, Jason sacrifices Steven and opens up a portal through which he and the kids travel. Alice, Jessica and the FBI agent follow them and find themselves in a surrealistic painter's interpretation of hell.
Finally Freddy, who up until now has merely lingered in the shadows, has his moment in the sun.
You see, in another attempt to tie the histories of both characters together, Jason used to live on good old Elm Street in Springwood, where the original Nightmare's took place. In fact, his mother and father, fearing for the safety of their child, were among the members of the lynch mob that tracked Freddy down and burned him alive in the first place. Later, the Voorhees family moved to Crystal Lake and Freddy, now a dream killer, murders Jason in the lake. It was also Freddy who was responsible for bringing Jason back to life in an undead state and he used him as a ?puppet? throughout the entire run of the Friday movies.
And now, here in hell, Freddy and Jason are bickering over who gets to kill the interlopers. The bickering turns into a full-on brawl and we finally get to see the titular bout. It's interrupted, however, by the appearance of yet another entity, the shadowy force we witnessed way back in the 17th century. It's Thanos, more popularly known as?Satan! He's been behind the murders all this time and Freddy and Jason have only been his pawns.
Thanos needs to kill the children in order to create a new world in his image, which would be achieved through the slaughter of innocents in his sinful domain. Like a bad James Bond villain, he mentions his plans to take away Freddy and Jason's power once all is said and done and so the two turn their sights on the big guy himself. In simultaneous kung-fu stabbing action, they attack Thanos with the two Byzantine blades and save the world from Armageddon.
Apparently it would have seen the events of the third and fourth film retconned out of existence, and brought the Xenomorph to Earth.Cameron, who directed the sequel ("Aliens") to Scott's "Alien", says "I pitched that I would write it and produce it, and Ridley would direct it, and we had lunch talking about this, and we were in violent agreement, then nothing happened. What happened was Fox went ahead with Aliens Vs Predator, and I said "I really don't recommend that, you'll ruin the franchise, it's like Universal doing Dracula versus the Werewolf," and then I lost interest in doing an Alien film."
I came here to say that as well. I never liked kotor 2 as a whole, I realise that is a nerd crime but I didn't. I did however like bits of it and I really do belive that if they had been given more time they could have made something great.Diablo2000 said:Knights of Old Republic 3
Obsidian had awesome plans for it, trying to show the Sith as a actual manece rather than more guys with thunder power and red glow stick. Sadly Lucasarts were horrible and didn't let Obsidian reach Kotor 2 full potencial (Yes I am still hurt about it!) and than Bioware came with that awful comic the bridges Kotor and Old Republic (Which was a salt to the wound)... And Old Republic itself, which was an alright enough game. But wasn't Kotor 3.
Ya know there's a comic of Freddy vs Jason vs The Evil Dead? I would have loved to have seen a film of THAT!DisasterSoiree said:This [http://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/freddy_v_jason_briggs.html] unused draft for Freddy vs. Jason, back when it was stuck in development hell.
More. [http://midnitemedia.blogspot.com/2009/04/unseen-cinema-unused-freddy-vs-jason_06.html]
Freddy vs. Jason vs. Satan, with occult overtones and a darker mid-nineties edge to it? Count me in. The reviewer didn't like it, but I did, mainly because it was a completionist story that accounted for all of the movies in both series. And the aforementioned Darker Nineties Edge: I love movies like that, and I hate the jokey PG-13 shitfest Ronnie Yu eventually made.Of all the would-be scripts turned down before the studio found the proper one for Freddy Vs. Jason this 1995 take by Peter Briggs is the most ambitious. Perhaps a bit too ambitious, as it turns out it's a bit confusing for those who don't follow theology.
The script starts with a prologue in 17th century Italy where a witch hunter and a dignitary each use a pair of Byzantine blades (exactly like the one used to defeat Jason Voorhees in Jason Goes To Hell) to defeat a demonic force that was summoned by a necromancer. The blades, the only weapons capable of defeating such a monster, were ?forged by the alchemists of Atlantis from the blade that pierced the side of Christ.?
Already, we're mixing mythology and theology up in a frothy brew.
As the dark force is returning to its home in hell, he promises to come back when time reaches its close.
Flash forward to December 31, 1999. We're in neutral territory here, the small town of Bethlehem, Virginia. The world is fast falling apart around us, literally going to hell in a hand basket. A millennium cult sacrifices a young girl to a pagan god in an old book store and conjures up a familiar visage: Jason Voorhees. He promptly kills off the cultists and then takes his spree to the streets.
But there is a more karmic force at work here as well.
After Steven Freeman and Jessica Voorhees sent Jason to hell 8 years ago, they got married, became a real family with their child, and started a small automotive repair business in Bethlehem. On this particular night, Steven gets a call from a woman having a little roadside trouble. When he shows up to fix the car, it belongs to none other than Alice Johnson and her young son Jacob (last seen in Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child), who were just passing through. The car is going to take a day to fix, so Steven offers the Johnson's shelter in his home. Unbeknownst to each other, both families have had their fair share of dealings with supernatural killers.
Meanwhile, an FBI agent receives a package from the Vatican containing files on both Alice Johnson and Jessica Freeman. Not quite sure what the package means, he and his partner travel to Virginia to speak to Jessica and are surprised to find that Alice is there as well, purely by chance. Together they all sit down to try and sort out the mess. But soon Jason shows up, slicing and dicing as usual.
Jason wreaks his usual carnage and kidnaps Steven and the kids. Taking them back to the bookstore where he was summoned, Jason sacrifices Steven and opens up a portal through which he and the kids travel. Alice, Jessica and the FBI agent follow them and find themselves in a surrealistic painter's interpretation of hell.
Finally Freddy, who up until now has merely lingered in the shadows, has his moment in the sun.
You see, in another attempt to tie the histories of both characters together, Jason used to live on good old Elm Street in Springwood, where the original Nightmare's took place. In fact, his mother and father, fearing for the safety of their child, were among the members of the lynch mob that tracked Freddy down and burned him alive in the first place. Later, the Voorhees family moved to Crystal Lake and Freddy, now a dream killer, murders Jason in the lake. It was also Freddy who was responsible for bringing Jason back to life in an undead state and he used him as a ?puppet? throughout the entire run of the Friday movies.
And now, here in hell, Freddy and Jason are bickering over who gets to kill the interlopers. The bickering turns into a full-on brawl and we finally get to see the titular bout. It's interrupted, however, by the appearance of yet another entity, the shadowy force we witnessed way back in the 17th century. It's Thanos, more popularly known as?Satan! He's been behind the murders all this time and Freddy and Jason have only been his pawns.
Thanos needs to kill the children in order to create a new world in his image, which would be achieved through the slaughter of innocents in his sinful domain. Like a bad James Bond villain, he mentions his plans to take away Freddy and Jason's power once all is said and done and so the two turn their sights on the big guy himself. In simultaneous kung-fu stabbing action, they attack Thanos with the two Byzantine blades and save the world from Armageddon.
Fuck Kelly Roland's face.
Eish. D9 was a good movie but such a massive downer that I probably wouldn't watch the sequel. I watch movies to be *happy* or at least entertained.Aerosteam said:That movie already exists, OP.
Anyway, I'll go with District 10, sequel to my favourite movie of all time. Not sure what you would be with it though, maybe the Oppressing Adventures of Bug-Alien-Man?