Just what the subject says whats your favorite strategy game?
Mine is final fantasy tactics WotL for psp strategy on the go mofos!!!!
Mine is final fantasy tactics WotL for psp strategy on the go mofos!!!!
Eh I kinda disagree as you can't really play a full defensive game, break the enemy army on your base defenses(as long as there strategically superior) As far as star-craft is concerned it's really only offensive play friendly. Don't get me wrong it's absolutely one of the best RTS's of all time but to imply it's the best ever made, would imply it would allow me to use all possible play-styles effectively as well.Wolfram01 said:Original Starcraft, duh.
Hmm...Chess does seem like a good strategy game. Not even ping spikes and frame skips can ruin that game.Kahunaburger said:Chess. Good community, deep gameplay. It even has local multiplayer!
But what if you where playing a computer connected to a robotic arm over a W.A.N? OR via the internet to get to the arm.aprildog18 said:Hmm...Chess does seem like a good strategy game. Not even ping spikes and frame skips can ruin that game.Kahunaburger said:Chess. Good community, deep gameplay. It even has local multiplayer!
You know, despite my dislike of both Empire and Napoleon, I still like Empire more. Napoleon removed the research aspect, and all the units fired the same way. In Empire, I loved watching the transition from mass fire to rank fire and fire and advance tactics. In the early stages of technological revolution, the new fighting stances were real game changers.A Weary Exile said:My vote goes to Empire: Total War with one caveat: it's not that great without Darthmod Empire, and I only really enjoy the Late Campaign, but that Late Campaign is some of the most enjoyable strategy gameplay I've ever experienced.
I thought Napoleon's gameplay was a lot more balanced, had a sort of rock/paper/scissors thing that Empire *tried* to have but failed miserably at it. What I like about Empire is the huge theater of war with all the different continents and vastly different factions.Soviet Heavy said:You know, despite my dislike of both Empire and Napoleon, I still like Empire more. Napoleon removed the research aspect, and all the units fired the same way. In Empire, I loved watching the transition from mass fire to rank fire and fire and advance tactics. In the early stages of technological revolution, the new fighting stances were real game changers.A Weary Exile said:My vote goes to Empire: Total War with one caveat: it's not that great without Darthmod Empire, and I only really enjoy the Late Campaign, but that Late Campaign is some of the most enjoyable strategy gameplay I've ever experienced.
I've never tried The Rights of Man. Is it any good?A Weary Exile said:I thought Napoleon's gameplay was a lot more balanced, had a sort of rock/paper/scissors thing that Empire *tried* to have but failed miserably at it. What I like about Empire is the huge theater of war with all the different continents and vastly different factions.Soviet Heavy said:You know, despite my dislike of both Empire and Napoleon, I still like Empire more. Napoleon removed the research aspect, and all the units fired the same way. In Empire, I loved watching the transition from mass fire to rank fire and fire and advance tactics. In the early stages of technological revolution, the new fighting stances were real game changers.A Weary Exile said:My vote goes to Empire: Total War with one caveat: it's not that great without Darthmod Empire, and I only really enjoy the Late Campaign, but that Late Campaign is some of the most enjoyable strategy gameplay I've ever experienced.
That and vanilla Napoleon lacks a "Sandbox campaign" where you can play with the entire world with whoever you want, which is the kind of campaign I like. TROM 2 fixes that somewhat, but I still prefer Empire's larger scale.
Ayuppers. Adds crap-tons of new units (Especially for Great Britain and France, the units can barely even fit on the UI >.>), makes it *way* harder, and makes non-playable factions (Like the Ottoman Empire and Sweden) playable.Soviet Heavy said:I've never tried The Rights of Man. Is it any good?A Weary Exile said:I thought Napoleon's gameplay was a lot more balanced, had a sort of rock/paper/scissors thing that Empire *tried* to have but failed miserably at it. What I like about Empire is the huge theater of war with all the different continents and vastly different factions.Soviet Heavy said:You know, despite my dislike of both Empire and Napoleon, I still like Empire more. Napoleon removed the research aspect, and all the units fired the same way. In Empire, I loved watching the transition from mass fire to rank fire and fire and advance tactics. In the early stages of technological revolution, the new fighting stances were real game changers.A Weary Exile said:My vote goes to Empire: Total War with one caveat: it's not that great without Darthmod Empire, and I only really enjoy the Late Campaign, but that Late Campaign is some of the most enjoyable strategy gameplay I've ever experienced.
That and vanilla Napoleon lacks a "Sandbox campaign" where you can play with the entire world with whoever you want, which is the kind of campaign I like. TROM 2 fixes that somewhat, but I still prefer Empire's larger scale.
The sheer volume and speed at which Huskarls are produced was the problem, also being able to do it from a normal barracks made it very easy to overwhlem an enemy with them.SecretNegative said:Wut? Sure Huskarls were annoying against archers, but the bloody Goths can't build any walls, you'd just waltz right up to their buildings.Michael Hirst said:It was good when we could agree on what was OP (Koreans and Goths pretty much)
In the TW series Napoleon is one of my favorites as well, it does have a very good balance. The tactical battles also tend to be more varied for some reason. Shogun 2 has some good tactical battles as well, but the campaign map is boring, and tends to revolve around city-hopping.A Weary Exile said:I thought Napoleon's gameplay was a lot more balanced, had a sort of rock/paper/scissors thing that Empire *tried* to have but failed miserably at it. What I like about Empire is the huge theater of war with all the different continents and vastly different factions.
That and vanilla Napoleon lacks a "Sandbox campaign" where you can play with the entire world with whoever you want, which is the kind of campaign I like. TROM 2 fixes that somewhat, but I still prefer Empire's larger scale.