Black Ops: Multiplayer Vs Campaign Vs Zombies

[Joshua Tax]

I recently bought Call of Duty: Black Ops for the Xbox 360 for 59.99(+tax) new. Well, I realized shortly after diving into it that I did not buy one concrete game. I bought 3 small games conveniently placed on one disk. So my question I pose is:

If Call of Duty: Black Ops' campaign, multiplayer and zombies were all sold separately, how much of the 60$ would be partitioned for each installment, and why?

 

[Katherine Kerensky]

If Activision could have gotten away with it, they would have sold it as three separate games, and each at the full selling price.
But I don't think people are quite stupid enough to fall for that yet.
Maybe by Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6.

 

[Thunderhorse31]

Are you asking for our personal opinion, which part we value above the others? If so, I'd go 90% MP, 8% SP, 2% Zombies. Play through the story once on Vet, ignore zombies completely (until peer pressure forces me not to). Multiplayer is clearly where it's at.

Activision/Treyarch obviously spent much more than that on the campaign, which is kind of a waste, considering that they have to pay the likes of Ice Cube, Gary Oldman, Sam Worthington, and Ed Harris for voices in a story that is mostly ass.

 

[Amishdemon]

If Activision could have gotten away with it, they would have sold it as three separate games, and each at the full selling price.
But I don't think people are quite stupid enough to fall for that yet.
Maybe by Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6.

I can't wait till treyarch sells a separate zombies game.

OT:I only played the sp before the person who lent it to me wnated it back and thought it was great but not worth 60 dollar alone.