SilentHunter7 post=18.70838.705526 said:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080907/ap_on_re_ca/canada_election
He can do that??
Can someone explain to an American how that works? Because from down here, it seems awfully dictatorial of him.
Not really. Constitutionally he's obliged to hold an election promptly after dissolving Parliament... in this case, on October 14th. (Heh, ahead of the US one; which is ironic considering that PM Harper enacted a "fixed election date" law which he's arguably breaking by calling this election.) So we're not without a democratically-elected government for very long.
Any party or PM getting too eager at calling snap elections for political purposes gets punished, harshly, up here; the most dramatic example I can think of is the upset win for the left-wing New Democratic Party in the '90s when the ruling centrist Liberal Party called an early election.[sup]*[/sup] As a result, though the PM could theoretically call an election any time he wants in practice he (or she) has to take voter backlash into account first.
There's another risk, too; the Governor-General doesn't necessarily have to call an election. He (or she, as is the case now) can go to the opposition parties instead and ask if they can put together a coalition with enough seats to assume power. That's another roll of the dice if you're calling an election for personal gain... the GG might call you on it and hand power to your opponents instead.
In a way I like this system over the fixed-date systems found elsewhere; there's less grandstanding, no "lame duck" problems with the executive branch, legislators have to watch what they do in case they have to go to the polls soon, and it keeps elections short.
-- Steve
edited to add the following footnote:
* note that this was a provincial (think state, for the US) election, for the province of Ontario.