England Vs. Germany!

[oliveira8]

Hahaha the referee is blind. Oh well it's England getting whats coming to them, after cheating their way to the world cup back in '66. ^^

 

[lee1287]

The referees a wanker! God. i hope he gts shot. That's right. DEAD.

 

[Bobzer77]

Why is football technologically retarded?

Every other sport on the planet lets the ref check video replays, if football did that too that goal would have been allowed and Ireland might be in the world cup because Thiery Henry wouldn't have gotten away with that handball...

 

[JourneyThroughHell]

Fuck me what a game

I actually feel bad for England now... FIFA fail so hard with thier pre-historic attitude to replays

It's undoubtedly the best game of the Cup even if they stand around for the whole second half.
And it's utterly ruined.

Not if Germany win 4-1. Then the excuse won't be there.

If it stays like this: Yeah, it will.
Controversy and England Germany go hand in hand.

Another phenomenally bad decision from the ref.

It still will, I think.
I mean, it might have sabotaged the flow of the game.
This is not the first mistake by the ref, btw, that Defoe header that hit the upper post was no offside either.

 

[WaNNaBJusTLiKeU]

Fuck me what a game

I actually feel bad for England now... FIFA fail so hard with thier pre-historic attitude to replays

It's undoubtedly the best game of the Cup even if they stand around for the whole second half.
And it's utterly ruined.

Not if Germany win 4-1. Then the excuse won't be there.

If it stays like this: Yeah, it will.
Controversy and England Germany go hand in hand.

Another phenomenally bad decision from the ref.

Seriously? Of course the excuse will be there, it should be 2-2, and at 2-2 it's a totally different game. Just because Germany may go on to a heavy win, it doesn't change a thing now, this game should be 2-2.

 

[Sodoff]

that was quite the phail

 

[erto101]

OMFG!!!!
That was a goal!

 

[WakeTheDead1]

No video evidence allowed in the world cup, is the head of Fifa an Amish, or just a dickhead

if video evidence was allowed the ref could have clearly seen that england had a rightful goal then

 

[Leviathan_]

remember 1966 world cup finals UK?


No goal for you!

 

[SnipErlite]

THE REFEREE'S A WANKER.

Come on....how obvious can it get??

why oh why isn't technology allowed......sigh.

 

[WakeTheDead1]

[/quote]This is not the first mistake by the ref, btw, that Defoe header that hit the upper post was no offside either.[/quote]

not to mention when he didnt get out of the way before and an England player ran into him

 

[Jackalb]

That was a fucking goal. Cunts.

 

[Pariah87]

How could the linesman not see either? An inch I can understand but there was at least 2 feet of grass between that ball and the line. Still, it's gonna be an interesting next 45, I forsee penalties.

 

[Loop Stricken]

So I've heard a few rumours that the referee is a wanker?

 

[RoyalWelsh]

Tut tut, ref. Tut tut. EVERYONE saw that was a goal. Video Replay's or not, how the ref didn't see that was a goal is beyond me.

 

[R4ptur3]

Stupid ref, stupid linesman. Why they hell do fifa have to be so greedy. JUST USE VIDEO REPLAYS DAMN IT. Fifa will use the excuse about the fact that it's the ref and the linesmans job to see it, but with the technology we now have. why the hell can we not just use it.

GRRR!

And i'm sorry to the Germans, but it's not 1966, we have the technology now to view it again and again, so we are not techincally even.

 

[Dyme]

That was the power of the octopus.

 

[Will of One]

Wow that was awful. It was so in!

 

[JourneyThroughHell]

remember 1966 world cup finals UK?


No goal for you!

Hmm... Well, if you put it that way.
Still, why should the current English players pay for a referee fuck-up that happened 44 years ago.
Not justice.