The Escapist Staff said:
077: J.J. Abrams and The End of THQ
This week, The Escapist crew braves an incoming ice storm to bring you a thought-provoking discussion on J.J. Abrams helming the brand new Star Wars film. We also discuss the end of THQ, Tomb Raider and our favorite game mechanics!
Watch Video
Happening upon "used porn" in that way stirs the same kind of uncomfortable mix of feelings as when you sit down on a public toilet and it's warm. Part of you thinks, "Well, at least it's not cold," but then you think a bit more about it and wonder if this is
actually better.
On
Star Wars, I'm totally on board with Susan. Abrams is not right for this flavor of sci-fi.
Star Trek has always been far, far more about the toys than the people (though the reboot helped this a bit), and it's always been very clean.
Star Wars, especially the original trilogy, was just as much about the
smuggler as it was the Jedi. The Force was a recurring theme, but it
was not the central idea. (It was the second trilogy that was extremely one-note -- glowbat fiesta!} The central idea was good triumphing despite insurmountable odds at the hands of reluctant heroes.
I don't want Abrams to be
all of my sci-fi. I wouldn't even want Joss Whedon to do it (we've already had his perfect Han Solo via Mal Reynolds). This is the time for a new voice.
- New actors - no established names with firmly established expectations.
- New settings - the universe seems tiny if we're always coming back to Tatooine.
- New character archetypes - we've explored the duty-bound-Jedi, the Smuggler-with-a-heart-of-gold, and the secretly-kickass-Politician. It's a bit too Tank/Healer/DPS at the moment.
- That includes villains, too. Enough mustache-twirling. Let's have some believable motivations, and
maybe an "evil" leader who isn't a Sith.
- New director - Lucas's success in the first trilogy was that he wasn't so bloody
aware that he was "making
Star Wars." Let's have someone who isn't bound by all the baggage, or caught in all the old habits.