Fallout 3 - PC, Xbox 360, PS3

Recommended Videos

Dorchucks

New member
Dec 17, 2008
49
0
0
If you have played the previous series, playing this, you?ll probably end up with a question like this: ?is this what I expected?? well actually no, the game has almost the same story with the previous ones, and fallout 3 has some minor problems, but lets take them all one by one.

Starting the game, you?ll feel it real, playing as a child, as a teen and as an adult, in encounters every time you succeed a vats finishing shot your enemies? heads pop-off or you dismember them and so on, while attempting a skill(like hack) you actually attempt the skill in a ?mini-game? you actually do something and take the risk on your own, and if you fail you can?t try again (except if you have a certain perk), the graphic are cool. Your mission is to find your father, who is a runaway citizen from vault 101 which human created to keep them safe from radiation, no one would enter or leave vault 101. Following your dad you end up in a huge wasteland, wondering around and ask information about your dads? position. You?ll enter in many towns, you chose to help people (good karma) or harm people (bad karma), but the problem is: IT DOESN?T MATTER IF IT?S A GOOD KARMA OR BAD! You can actually change your karma in an instance just by doing some minor repeatable quests, so the whole karma system is ****.

Out in the wastelands you?ll encounter random enemies. So you have this first person view or third person view, you aim and shoot, and there is the V.A.T.S. system. A system that by pressing one button you stop the time, and you have the ability to choose certain parts of your enemy (like torso, head, arms), select how many times you want to hit, and then the computer takes the control of your player and it takes the shots for you. The slow motion graphics and the zoom and the nice point of view actions is something fascinating, but imagine in a fps game the special combat action is to freeze the time and to leave the computer do everything, and yes computer has a better change of hitting the target, and I think it will increase the possibility of a critical strike. And the item system, while encountering enemies you can press another button, and the time stops AGAIN, you can heal yourself, buff up yourself, change weapon, and there you go! a new look.

Ok the items, the majority of the items are useless pieces of junk but most of them are very expensive from ashtrays to conductors. When you kill an enemy, you can take everything from them and then you can violate their bodies, but anyway, you have a weigh capacity, and after killing 5 raiders, you are full and you walk really slow and you can?t fast traveler to a city, so you have to throw something, go back to the city, store the items, come back and take the others, this is NOT fun. Then you probably say ?why hell you take those items? well if you won?t take them you?ll have no money to repair, buy ammo, etc. From the other hand the game allow you to kill anyone, you can actually massacre the whole city and take EVERYTHING but you will lose karma (something you don?t care) and you lose quest (= a huge amount of exp).

Skills and perks, skills are essential, and as a good role-playing game you?ll have to choose 3-4 main skills to advance. You can choose to use small guns and hack computers, picklock and science and the list goes on, but you can?t have them all balanced, actually the game always has 2-3 options, like if you can?t picklock the strongbox, you can hack the computer and unlock it from there, and if you have balanced skills then you will end up doing nothing. You can choose one perk per level, perks is like feat in D&D something bonus, basically more skill points. Perks can lead to a good combination of perks and skills mixed up, there is a good amount of perks for every type of a character you wanna be.

Npc and every day life, THEY ARE TERRIBLE, you can actually go to everyone?s house and steal anything you want in front of their own eyes, and they will do nothing to stop you, and then you talk to them and they are like ?hey my friend, did you find your dad yet?? not to mention the pickpocket thing, the assassination, you can almost kill one by one each citizen in a town and citizens DON?T CARE about it. And your enemies are like 3 types? There are super mutants, orcs in rpg language, raiders, bandits in rpg language and some annoying radiation **** ?animals?.

My personal opinion is that after playing a while, its kind of feels like a routine, encountering the same enemies, talking to the same voices, visiting the same wasteland fields. And the worse is that the game has NO bosses, there are some mini bosses whom you?ll enjoy, but there are no main bosses, and I was waiting for a great boss and I saved all my nukes, just to find NOTHING. Fallout 3 has some absolutely pointless and stupid skills, imagine a wasteland full of creature with radiation, and there is Jackie Chan trying to save the world?! With what kind of logic would a man fist fight some gigantic mutants, or gargantuan ants FULL OF RADIATION, and not only the idea, but each mutant has a MINIGUN with him. Or there is melee weapon skill, almost the same thing, but there are no good melee weapons in fallout 3, there are some kind of swords, but then you?ll come up with a common weapon called the ripper, which is more effective than any other sword. And the ripper (a one-handed chainsaw sword) strikes so fast, that the melee skill is USELESS. The game tried to put music, which sucks btw, and the music never change, you?ll go into combat, you will go fatal life but the music remains the same, something in modern gaming is bad. To sum up, if you enjoyed playing the old fallout games, you will enjoy this one, if you like oblivion (people says that fallout 3 is oblivion with guns) you will probably enjoy it too. This game could be better, vats system really takes you out of the fps gaming. I enjoyed fallout by killing EVERYONE.
 

saintchristopher

Goes "Ding" When There's Stuff.
Aug 14, 2009
759
0
0
I think you might be preaching to the wrong crowd with this review.

Why did you censor yourself? was your mom standing right behind you when you typed this?

you bemoan (look it up) the pointlessness of the hand-to-hand and melee skills; what you failed to note was the significance of the fact that they were included at all. Bethesda actually gave players the option to play the game however they wanted.

It's a theme that is conspicuously absent from your review, the fact that players have an abundance of choices. You're upset that players can fight with their hands; your upset that players can stop combat to use the VATS system; what you're ignoring is that little phrase there, "players can." Between picking a fighting style, major skills, whether or not to use VATS, and how they interact with the world, Fallout 3 is an extremely customizable game, and few players have had the exact same experience as one another their first time playing through.

Merely because you tried to play the game like it was FEAR 2 and had a hard time does not justify a review this poorly written negative.

What i mean to say is, your review is poorly written. your ideas are half-formed and badly articulated. Yahtzee Croshaw can get away with coming off as a dick. You can't.
 

Baggie

New member
Sep 3, 2009
260
0
0
I don't mean to be an arse, but you might want to brush up a bit. You seemed to cover only a small amount of the entire game too briefly, and you tend to float from random point to random point.
Also people tend to be more receptive if you're not constantly negative with no reason as to why these things are a problem to you. Practically any opinion is accepted as long as it's given a meaning as to why it was formed, not wild unfounded accusations.
 

Cuddly Knife

New member
May 20, 2009
448
0
0
Too much negativity in the review. i wouldn't mid it, if the game was garbage, but it's not. Don't try to make it into something it's not, please.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
That is pretty much dead on and I still enjoyed the game a bunch.

If you play on a PC you can get a mod called "Atomic Postal Service" which will transfer everything you put into a big postal box to a mailbox outside of your house. This saves a few trips to town but since there are no mailboxes underground you still have inventory issues. Then later in the game you are so rich it isn't worth picking up anything.

I also have a mod that automatically picks the locks and hacks the comps if your skill is high enough, the hacking and lockpick mini-games are unfun in my opinion and are out of place.

The karma system was...poor. It didn't affect gameplay one bit, only gave you something to keep track of if you happened to be good or evil.

If you have a PC Mart's Mutant Mod gives a much greater variety of mutants and gives enemies different skills.

My main beef with the skill system is your guns decayed so fast and started so crappy and the npc's sucked so much at repair that the repair skill was absolutely mandatory.
 

Jekken6

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,285
0
0
tl;dr
Pictures might be nice to break up the writing and with a game like this, you might want to review it in sections and sub sections
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
you realise that you were MEANT to only be able to take some of the stuff, your were MEANT to only be able to specialise in a couple skills at a time, and that the melee weapon skill increased the damage of weapons so that you didn't have to use the ripper, which deteriorated so fast it was hardly worth using.

aside from that, to much negativity, and you may want to put in pictures
 

shwnbob

New member
May 16, 2009
1,119
0
0
Pictures would be nice and theres no positive points only negatives the game isn't all crap theres loads to say about it that are positive. Actually the whole game is great there are no negatives.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
If you don't like VATS or Hand to Hand combat then fire manually.


Jekken6 said:
tl;dr
Pictures might be nice to break up the writing and with a game like this, you might want to review it in sections and sub sections
If you can't be bothered to read the reviewer's posts your in the wrong forum
 

Parallel Streaks

New member
Jan 16, 2008
784
0
0
"If you enjoyed the old Fallout games you'll enjoy this one"? Seriously? These games couldn't be more different, the only similar thing is the setting and premise. An RPG in post-apocalyptia.

I myself would have found Fallout 3 much more fun if it had been given a different title. When I wasn't bitterly moaning about what could have been I found I actually slightly enjoyed wandering the wasteland and finding random things.

Unfortunately the one thing that ruined it was when it forced you to go through the DC ruins, those things were so convoluted and difficult to navigate that there were several times I thought sod it and activated No Clip.
 

Adinoman

New member
Sep 11, 2009
45
0
0
I had actually never played the previous games in the Fallout series. First off, yes the game had some technical issues and after awhile all the characters started looking like cookie-cutouts from earlier ones.

That being said, the game was immensely fun and satisfying. Being able to go out and explore a hellish, barren post apocalyptic waste while learning about the history of what happened to the world really dragged you in and kept you there. Sadly, the one over-arching problem was, like Parallel Streaks said, the fact that you couldn't explore the ruins easily because all the blocked streets and those irritating subway tunnels