I know it's technically called action adventure, but Shemue isn't an action game in the sense you are implying, really. The action sequences are few and far between. It's mostly about slow methodical exploration and interaction with people objects around the town/area. It's mostly about story, kind of like Heavy Rain or something, except you can interact with more stuff. So I still think these games have their place.Smithnikov said:Here's the thing.
I played through Shenmue when it was still fresh, enjoyed it well enough, but when I got into the Yakuza series, it hit all the same notes that I thought good with Shenmue but with far FARRRR more satisfying action. So I really can't see a reason to have these unless one is a completionist and wants to see what the early days of such games are like.
Remember that this game from a technical perspective of the time was a graphical milestone for Console Gaming and a showcase of what the Dreamcast was capable of.Casual Shinji said:Never played them, and maybe the story will carry all of the weight, but what I've seen of it from the trailers it looks dated to hell and back. Even with the spitshine it looks like a slightly more detailed Dynasty Warriors 2.
You should at least try them. As I said above it's more about the joy of exploration, interacting with people/objects and working out what to do next and that's Shenmue's appeal. Just because something is old doesn't automatically make it not fun.Casual Shinji said:Never played them, and maybe the story will carry all of the weight, but what I've seen of it from the trailers it looks dated to hell and back. Even with the spitshine it looks like a slightly more detailed Dynasty Warriors 2.
They're completely different, and Yakuza should not be treated as a Shenmue spiritual sequel. It's a completely different game with only superficial similarities. Yakuza is a brawler at heart, with adventure aspects. Shenmue is the direct opposite, a pure adventure game that very occasionally has a few fights. People's preference for one over the other generally hinges on which type of game they're looking for.CoCage said:I never got the chance to play Shenmue, but I am not too interested. I am happy for my fellow Sega brothers and sisters though. The fact that the Yakuza games picked up where Shenmue left off and filling the gap for nearly 20 years, does not help.
You are right about that, but it does not make what I said or other thinking the same thing, any less true.dscross said:They're completely different, and Yakuza should not be treated as a Shenmue spiritual sequel. It's a completely different game with only superficial similarities. Yakuza is a brawler at heart, with adventure aspects. Shenmue is the direct opposite, a pure adventure game that very occasionally has a few fights. People's preference for one over the other generally hinges on which type of game they're looking for.CoCage said:I never got the chance to play Shenmue, but I am not too interested. I am happy for my fellow Sega brothers and sisters though. The fact that the Yakuza games picked up where Shenmue left off and filling the gap for nearly 20 years, does not help.
What do you mean? You said 'Yakuza picked up where Shenmue left off and filling the gap for nearly 20 years'. I'm just disputing that by saying they are fundamentally different that's all. Otherwise the post might put people off trying it because they are might get the impression that Shenmue is basically a worse version of Yakuza.CoCage said:You are right about that, but it does not make what I said or other thinking the same thing, any less true.dscross said:They're completely different, and Yakuza should not be treated as a Shenmue spiritual sequel. It's a completely different game with only superficial similarities. Yakuza is a brawler at heart, with adventure aspects. Shenmue is the direct opposite, a pure adventure game that very occasionally has a few fights. People's preference for one over the other generally hinges on which type of game they're looking for.CoCage said:I never got the chance to play Shenmue, but I am not too interested. I am happy for my fellow Sega brothers and sisters though. The fact that the Yakuza games picked up where Shenmue left off and filling the gap for nearly 20 years, does not help.
If I came off as saying that Shenmue was a worse version of Yakuza, my bad, was not the intention. I was just saying Yakuza has been filling that niche for nearly 20 years. Yes, Yakuza is more of a brawler at heart, and Shenmue is more of an adventure game, but that still counts for a lot. Look, I think everyone is happy that Shenmue is getting a re-realease and a sequel; there is no refuting that.dscross said:What do you mean? You said 'Yakuza picked up where Shenmue left off and filling the gap for nearly 20 years'. I'm just disputing that by saying they are fundamentally different that's all. Otherwise the post might put people off trying it because they are might get the impression that Shenmue is basically a worse version of Yakuza.CoCage said:You are right about that, but it does not make what I said or other thinking the same thing, any less true.dscross said:They're completely different, and Yakuza should not be treated as a Shenmue spiritual sequel. It's a completely different game with only superficial similarities. Yakuza is a brawler at heart, with adventure aspects. Shenmue is the direct opposite, a pure adventure game that very occasionally has a few fights. People's preference for one over the other generally hinges on which type of game they're looking for.CoCage said:I never got the chance to play Shenmue, but I am not too interested. I am happy for my fellow Sega brothers and sisters though. The fact that the Yakuza games picked up where Shenmue left off and filling the gap for nearly 20 years, does not help.