lechat said:
Mr F. said:
hypnotism isn't really up for debate it's basically up there with evolution as far as acceptance in the medical and scientific community goes
stage hypnosis on the other hand is often shady. the only reason i bought the stage show i seen was because it was at a local club which i often attend and contained a large number of ppl i actually know, short of the hypnotist paying my friends a large sum of money (so much so that he would not have made any money) or my friends fucking with me and intentionally making themselves look like morons it is unlikely it was faked
as for the intelligence thing all i can say is DO NOT google at 5am https://www.google.com.au/search?q=hyptnotism%20on%20smart%20people
Did you actually go through the search results?
Because lets see what the results are:
Popsci.
A wiki page on stage hypnosis
A bunch of pages from websites that actively promote hypnotism, hypnotherapy courses etc etc. And none of the above make the claim that intelligent people are more likely to be hynotised.
Now I will jump over to the wiki page that was near the top.
First paragraph
Expert opinion is divided over whether participants' responses are best explained as being due to an altered state of consciousness ("hypnotic trance") or by a combination of deliberate deception and ordinary social psychological factors such as disorientation, compliance, peer pressure, and ordinary suggestion.
So much for the scientific community accepting this bullshit. Ah, but you will probably complain that the page in question is one on stage hypnosis (Although it explains your friends). Well, Time to move on!
The wiki page on Hypnosis makes no reference to intelligence whatsoever, outside of the term used for military intelligence (Spying and whatnot). It does make some reference that people who are imaginative are more susceptable, along with people who have been heavily abused and the mentally ill.
In closing?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/hypnotism-does-not-exist-say-the-experts-1389968.html
Not everyone believes it exists.
Dr Wagstaff, like scientists in the US and Canada, has conducted studies comparing the behaviour of people who have been hypnotised with that of people who have not. If both groups were given similar instructions, he found no significant difference in their responses.
People under hypnosis, he argues, behave oddly because they want to believe in it and because they are willing to comply with suggestions made to them. But why are they prepared to make themselves look ridiculous?
"They don't have to be hypnotised to do that. Look at what they are prepared to do on television for Bruce Forsyth or Noel Edmonds," says Dr Wagstaff.
Mr Kreskin lost his belief in hypnosis about 20 years ago, when he was called in to help a psychologist treat his patients. They found that patients for whom hypnotic techniques clearly did not work were just as likely to recover as those for whom they did.
Mr Kreskin now devotes his act to debunking hypnotism.
"I have shown that everything that we associate with hypnotism can be done without any voodoo-like induction," he says.
"If people are persuaded and motivated they will do any of these things."
Done here.