Hayao Miyazaki heavily critcises AI development team for movement AI

Recommended Videos

Dragonbums

Indulge in it's whiffy sensation
May 9, 2013
3,307
0
0
https://twitter.com/somebadideas/status/807141424030486530


For those who don't feel like clicking the link to watch- the basic premise of the video is that a team of coders and engineers designed a self learning AI to walk and were showing Miyazaki the weird ways in which the AI had achieved that objective.
In the case of this AI (modeled to look like a zombie.) it was dragging itself on the ground using it's head as the moving leg appendage as opposed to the actual leg.
They stated to Miyazaki that the goal of the AI was to run it through multiple times and use it's methods as a base animation standard for zombies, monsters, and other horrors for future horror games.
Miyazaki however took great offense to this. Reminding him of his friend (although he said he hasn't seen said friend recently?) that is unable to do the most basic tasks because he had stiff muscle in his arms.
After a little back and forth with the staff who were trying to redeem themselves in front of Miayazaki- the man then asked the team 'what was their goal' to which another man said "We want to create a robot that can make art".
The video then goes to another scene where Miyazaki is at home or a studio and he remarks how humans have lost faith in themselves.


My personal take on this is that I feel that Miyazaki took the point of the AI the completely wrong way and chastised them for something that the team never intended in the first place.
I won't say his opinion was invalid so much as that it didn't apply to this team all that much.
While they were doing super light ribbing in regards to how the AI used it's head as a leg instead of it's actual legs to move. (which might of set Miyazaki off on that front.) they were generally pretty neutral on how the AI went about things.
Now had the AI of looked like a standard generic human model and not a half rotted corpse I can definitely see the criticism that such experiments like this should be taken care of with consideration to heavily disabled people in that you aren't making displaying these actions as humorous when real people are shunned, made fun of and ostracized due to a disability that was inflicted on them or they were born with and they can't help it.

I also feel that Miyazaki was projecting real hard on what I think was his actual crux of the issue with the presentation was- and it was the fact that it was an AI. It wasn't done by human hands (outside of coding the thing.), it wasn't crafted by flesh beings who spent hours going face to face with real life people with disabilities who HAVE to move this way to get by on some of the most menial daily tasks. There was a detachment there on the most basic human level and that irritated him a lot.
The final nail in the coffin for him was when they said the ultimate goal was to make a robot that creates art. And for someone like Miyazaki that see that as his lifes' passion that peeved him. It's no secret that he sees the life around him and his work as integral parts of the process. It's all about observing and talking to people, traveling, feeling success, feeling failure. An AI at this moment cannot do those things, and he feels that today we spend far too much going on about how GREAT machines are and forgetting that we are pretty amazing too.

I could just be projecting all of this but the tl;dr of that is that this is definitely an interesting discussion to have all on it's own, but Miyazaki was in the wrong for off loading all of that on a team of scientists that never intended what he was accusing them of.

I mean, I think it's pretty fricken awesome that humans designed an AI like this. Surely that's a positive outlook for humanity right?
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
If machines can do art (which at the moment cannot be done without it being glaringly obvious) then you've basically taken the only sphere that was assured to not be under threat from the mechanical menace and given it to them on a silver platter. We already are under the threat of things like extinction from these things, and there are too many lines of work under threat (with the economy also being at risk as a result), having another thing at risk from the existential threat that is AI is not a good thing.
 

DudeistBelieve

TellEmSteveDave.com
Sep 9, 2010
4,771
1
0
Sounds to me like the guy was a douche to a bunch of young kids that just wanted to impress him.

This is why you don't meet your heroes folks.
 

Dragonbums

Indulge in it's whiffy sensation
May 9, 2013
3,307
0
0
Zontar said:
If machines can do art (which at the moment cannot be done without it being glaringly obvious) then you've basically taken the only sphere that was assured to not be under threat from the mechanical menace and given it to them on a silver platter. We already are under the threat of things like extinction from these things, and there are too many lines of work under threat (with the economy also being at risk as a result), having another thing at risk from the existential threat that is AI is not a good thing.
I definitely understand that point for sure. I just feel that in this instance it was kind of uncalled for.
As AI become more developed though I can see legislators and and government adding heavy restrictions on what an AI can do.
But as far as I can see here a lot of the work is still done by the staff and they would have to refine it's animations anyway to fit into the boundaries of how they want it to act in the game.
 

Dragonbums

Indulge in it's whiffy sensation
May 9, 2013
3,307
0
0
DudeistBelieve said:
Sounds to me like the guy was a douche to a bunch of young kids that just wanted to impress him.

This is why you don't meet your heroes folks.
Or be a lot more discerning about who you invite. Miyazakis disdain for transhumanist/AI things isn't exactly what he likes.
 

Gordon_4_v1legacy

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,577
0
0
Dragonbums said:
DudeistBelieve said:
Sounds to me like the guy was a douche to a bunch of young kids that just wanted to impress him.

This is why you don't meet your heroes folks.
Or be a lot more discerning about who you invite. Miyazakis disdain for transhumanist/AI things isn't exactly what he likes.
Yeah if they're gonna show off A.I. to anyone in Japanese comics and animation industry it sould be Masamune Shirow. He'd probably fucking love it and if they played their cards right might have also gotten some free porn.
 

Fox12

AccursedT- see you space cowboy
Jun 6, 2013
4,828
0
0
DudeistBelieve said:
Sounds to me like the guy was a douche to a bunch of young kids that just wanted to impress him.

This is why you don't meet your heroes folks.
To be fair, what the heck did they think was going to happen when they chose to show a robotic zombie to a notoriously cantankerous 80 year old animator, and then told him it was supposed to create art? Anyone who knows about Miyazaki knows that they just pushed every single one of his buttons. I can't help but feel like this was some kind of troll attempt, and they did all this on purpose.

Edit: Not that Miyazaki isn't an asshole. It's just that he was an asshole to his own son. He certainly wouldn't show any mercy to these poor suckers.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,347
4,013
118
To be fair that's not a terribly flattering or interesting demo is it? Complex as the AI may be it looks like any other convulsing ragdoll from a physics game ala Goat Simulator. Let's say you get one shot at impressing Hayao Miyazaki. Would you waste it on that?

That said, I'm not sure if Miyazaki understands the guy's "revolutionary" pitch or if he's just hung up on his gut reaction to the animation, which in itself isn't very impressive. He seems more disgusted by the icky zombie design than by the implication of further mechanizing the art form of animation.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,580
7,215
118
Country
United States
Yeah, I don't see how this could've gone any other way.

Miyazaki has already been throwing shade at anime in general for making copies of copies instead of animators learning how to draw people by drawing actual people, teaching a robot to animate so humans don't have to is going to be an instant turn off.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
Think of it from his perspective, his biggest issue with animators today is how little they care about or pay attention to actual human beings, and the great innovation in animation they chose to show off to him was basically a tool for allowing them to completely ignore watching how human beings move as part of their animation training, something that Miyazaki is fucking obsessed with. All he wants is for animators to actually look out the goddamn window and spend some time thinking about people, how did they expect him to react to a tool meant to circumvent that?
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
I feel like some context is need like was this a pitch for him to used that AI program or something? Honestly it feel like they should had pitch that AI to some horror movie companies or something.

Also I found the source http://www.tokyoreporter.com/2016/11/15/hayao-miyazaki-blasts-animators-on-nhk-over-ai-generated-zombie-clip/

Ok initially I did thought he was hash on them and Miyazaki is kinda like Frank Miller in that I think he would undo his lifetime work if he can travel to the past. Now I think more about it, I guess it's understandable.

What I mean is that I have a friend who likes Steven Hawking and yet he refuse to watched that film "A Theory of Everything". He knows full well it's a good film but he reveal to me that his uncle had the same disease Hawking has and passed away so the idea of watching him progress with the disease will be hard on him to watched.

So yeah, projecting onto thing is a common thing (I also reminded how Rooster Teeth empolyee Geoff couldn't watch the first Dead Rising game cos he was projecting his daughter as that dead girl zombie).
 

WindKnight

Quiet, Odd Sort.
Legacy
Jul 8, 2009
1,828
9
43
Cephiro
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
DudeistBelieve said:
Sounds to me like the guy was a douche to a bunch of young kids that just wanted to impress him.

This is why you don't meet your heroes folks.
His eulogy for Osamu Tezuka, the 'god of manga' was that he had ruined Anime. Miyazaki is a legendarily grumpy person - when Disney licensed the Ghibli films (against his wishes) his only comment was that he 'liked their marketing'.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Windknight said:
His eulogy for Osamu Tezuka, the 'god of manga' was that he had ruined Anime. Miyazaki is a legendarily grumpy person - when Disney licensed the Ghibli films (against his wishes) his only comment was that he 'liked their marketing'.
This was because Tezuka pushed for anime to be produced as cheap (looking) as possible, which they then proceeded in doing. And Miyazaki didn't exactly think this was the best course of action to put it lightly.

OT: Miyazaki hates computers and stuff like this in general, so I guess this isn't too much of a surprise. His movies might make him seem otherwise, but the dude is a massive curmudgeon. He's also not one for being too delicate toward other people's feelings. In a Making of video of Princess Mononoke, while fixing the work of another animator, he stated that said animator shouldn't be allowed to live. Not to his face, but still on camera.
 

NPC009

Don't mind me, I'm just a NPC
Aug 23, 2010
802
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
Windknight said:
His eulogy for Osamu Tezuka, the 'god of manga' was that he had ruined Anime. Miyazaki is a legendarily grumpy person - when Disney licensed the Ghibli films (against his wishes) his only comment was that he 'liked their marketing'.
This was because Tezuka pushed for anime to be produced as cheap (looking) as possible, which they then proceeded in doing. And Miyazaki didn't exactly think this was the best course of action to put it lightly.
That's not thw whole story, though. Yes, Tezuka did push for cheap animation to be able to make series that aired weekly. However, his intention was to use the money earned to fund more experimental projects, and he always encouraged his animators to experiment. Aside from popular television series, Mushi Pro and later on Tezuka Pro made everything from experimental shorts to full movies.

OT: Miyazaki hates computers and stuff like this in general, so I guess this isn't too much of a surprise. His movies might make him seem otherwise, but the dude is a massive curmudgeon. He's also not one for being too delicate toward other people's feelings. In a Making of video of Princess Mononoke, while fixing the work of another animator, he stated that said animator shouldn't be allowed to live. Not to his face, but still on camera.
Yep, the guy is an asshole, especially when it comes to technology. For instance, he compared the use of iPads by artists to masturbation. He's really quick to judge new technology, conveniently forgetting that people will need to experiment and even fail occassionally in order to eventually get the most out of it.
 

Dragonbums

Indulge in it's whiffy sensation
May 9, 2013
3,307
0
0
Revnak said:
Think of it from his perspective, his biggest issue with animators today is how little they care about or pay attention to actual human beings, and the great innovation in animation they chose to show off to him was basically a tool for allowing them to completely ignore watching how human beings move as part of their animation training, something that Miyazaki is fucking obsessed with. All he wants is for animators to actually look out the goddamn window and spend some time thinking about people, how did they expect him to react to a tool meant to circumvent that?
I have a feeling that they didn't really think this through.

One explanation I could]/i] think of is that you can't observe that many real life people (even for disabled people this kind of movement is extreme.) operating like this just to move around.
Alternatively they could of pitched it as a sort of baseline animation and as they refine it they will go out and observe and talk to real life people to make it more 'natural' in the unnatural sense.

But again that runs the risk of being highly insensitive to people who have to suffer with these mobility defects.
This is such a weird moral grey topic, but looking at the discussions online a lot of it seems to be Miyazaki was in the total right or total wrong. Which is a shame because I love the guy- but there is no need to hero worship him on everything he says.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,990
118
Zontar said:
We already are under the threat of things like extinction from these things, and there are too many lines of work under threat (with the economy also being at risk as a result), having another thing at risk from the existential threat that is AI is not a good thing.
Seriously? "under threat of extension by these things" ?? They can barely flop on the ground and you are already stating they are at our throats at the cusp of humanity's downfall? I think you are overreacting a lot. Not a bit, a lot.