Recently I bought a monster cable for my ps3, since it was down to about $50 and the sales person at Best Buy swore up and down that the quality was absolutely worth the price.
I have a $10 cable I was using for my cable box that has been so far just fine. Thinking I'd be better of switching them out since I use my cable far more than my PS3, I did just that and to my surprise, I noticed absolutely NO difference in quality... in fact, it seems to my imagination that the edges on the shows on the tv seem more-- "jagged"? So I Switched them back, no problem. No jagged edges. Switched again, Jaggies!
Now the jaggies aren't bad enough to really bother me, and if anything maybe the cables themselves are defective in some way so I might take them back, but doing some google research exposed me to a debate I wasn't aware was going on on the internet... the "Expensive" vs. "Inexpensive" HDMI cable debate.
Apparently some people seem to think you really do get what you pay for, and list a plethora of reasons for why you should buy those $300 cables at the local electronics store. But other people have argued that for any cable under 6 feet there really is no difference and all those claims of "superior", "premium", and "Ultra-fast" are all hot air pasted on packaging in order to sucker people into buying things at a ridiculously marked up price.
So in grand escapist tradition, I'd like to present the question to the forum, because I foolishly put more faith in you lot than any "expert" at a chain store.
Is there really a difference between a $5 6-foot HDMI 1.3x cable and the $200 ones? Or is this going to go down in history as one of the worst industry gauging debacles of the new millennium?
I have a $10 cable I was using for my cable box that has been so far just fine. Thinking I'd be better of switching them out since I use my cable far more than my PS3, I did just that and to my surprise, I noticed absolutely NO difference in quality... in fact, it seems to my imagination that the edges on the shows on the tv seem more-- "jagged"? So I Switched them back, no problem. No jagged edges. Switched again, Jaggies!
Now the jaggies aren't bad enough to really bother me, and if anything maybe the cables themselves are defective in some way so I might take them back, but doing some google research exposed me to a debate I wasn't aware was going on on the internet... the "Expensive" vs. "Inexpensive" HDMI cable debate.
Apparently some people seem to think you really do get what you pay for, and list a plethora of reasons for why you should buy those $300 cables at the local electronics store. But other people have argued that for any cable under 6 feet there really is no difference and all those claims of "superior", "premium", and "Ultra-fast" are all hot air pasted on packaging in order to sucker people into buying things at a ridiculously marked up price.
So in grand escapist tradition, I'd like to present the question to the forum, because I foolishly put more faith in you lot than any "expert" at a chain store.
Is there really a difference between a $5 6-foot HDMI 1.3x cable and the $200 ones? Or is this going to go down in history as one of the worst industry gauging debacles of the new millennium?