How would people like Jules Verne and H.G Wells react to modern sci-fi. leave your opinions below.
They would have the mental capacity to relies it is just make believe fantasy and won't take it to seriously.Gnomeking09 said:How would people like Jules Verne and H.G Wells react to modern sci-fi. leave your opinions below.
You forgot Robert Heinlein.Gnomeking09 said:How would people like Jules Verne and H.G Wells react to modern sci-fi. leave your opinions below.
How old is modern in your definition? Because Phillip K. Dick's work was often on shaky "real" science ground, but some of the stuff he did with and for the genre is pretty damn amazing and thought provoking.RAKtheUndead said:Considering that alarmingly little modern SF shows any sort of scientific thought or principle, you'd probably be right. I dislike the way that nobody seems to give a crap about being scientifically accurate, because I truly believe that the "restrictions" of reality could result in a better story for a serious film than a bunch of worthless handwaving.Ninja_X said:They would have the mental capacity to relies it is just make believe fantasy and won't take it to seriously.Gnomeking09 said:How would people like Jules Verne and H.G Wells react to modern sci-fi. leave your opinions below.
Yeah, they would be too busy reading science journals to give a toss about overweight grown men playing with toy light swords.Altorin said:fuck what they'd think of science fiction, what would they think of Science?
In some respects they'd be quite pleased, not least with Star Trek continuing their big ideas. On the other hand, SG1 probably has them spinning in their graves (it's great, but it's not exactly about social reform and hope for humanity's future).Gnomeking09 said:How would people like Jules Verne and H.G Wells react to modern sci-fi. leave your opinions below.