Is DLC overpriced?

Recommended Videos

dekkarax

New member
Apr 3, 2008
1,213
0
0
We used to have DLC back in the day, but they were called something different back then...

...they were called "patches".
 

Snowalker

New member
Nov 8, 2008
1,937
0
0
Glefistus said:
Vlane said:
Glefistus said:
But DLC is free!

Oh, you're talking about non-Valve games. Well, let me tell you, there is a reason I do not buy or play non-Valve games anymore.
Because you only like FPS's?
No, because when I buy a game I want a FINISHED PRODUCT, or at the very least free DLC. I don;t want to buy a game just to find out they have more shit planned for it- at a cost. Fallout 3 pissed me off so much when I found out I had to PAY for what is already a staple of good western RPGs, open-endedness.
Because heaven forebid developers getting paid for their job.
 

cieply

New member
Oct 21, 2009
351
0
0
I would like just to pint out that DLC isn't really suited for single player games. You buy the game, you finish the game, you uninstall it. And I don't think I'll install it again for a new character or quest. Games, what many people forget nowadays, have stories. For me buying DLC is like buying chapters for the book. It's cool to have more content but what's the point when I finished it? New chapters loose a lot of their appeal. And I leave the matter of DLC day 1as OP requested. As for the price... it works on assumtion that for you a few bucks isn't much. For you it may be +/- 2 bucks but for them its at least +/- few hundred thousands. So they will milk and they will squeeze. But I doubt that later DLC will be as succesful.
Such features work in MMOs when you play them constantly and bother to revisit them.
 

Americana12

New member
Nov 18, 2009
27
0
0
I honestly think it depends on the DLC for example both GTA expansions were way worth it but all of the Fo3 expansions (Except Point Lookout) left me feeling a little cheated but thats just me and my opinion.
 

Joe1897

New member
Oct 23, 2009
70
0
0
i agree DLC is over priced in games that dont really need them, or be cheap like dragon age origins (wardens keep)
BUT i would pay anything for the new content on the PC version of TF2, to be on the Xbox 360 :p
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Some? Yes it's horribly overpriced. I think Deadspace had guns downloadable for 2-3 dollars PER GUN, which didn't upset me because you can walk through that game with the pistol easily enough I believe. Then there's games like Fallout 3 that have DLC longer than full bloody games which is perfectly awesome.
 

MR T3D

New member
Feb 21, 2009
1,424
0
0
mappacks: should be free.
RPG expansions: can justify cost IF they are of equal or greater quality/price than the original game/price WHEN YOU BOUGHT IT NEW (if applicable, otherwise /common retailer price when you bought it)
 

mezmerizer02

New member
Jun 6, 2009
160
0
0
MR T3D said:
mappacks: should be free.
RPG expansions: can justify cost IF they are of equal or greater quality/price than the original game/price WHEN YOU BOUGHT IT NEW (if applicable, otherwise /common retailer price when you bought it)
i agree with this
 

BlackWidower

New member
Nov 16, 2009
783
0
0
I'm against paying for DLC altogether. I know it's the way of the future and all but that seems like a cop-out. It relies too much on external forces. If I buy something I want to actually buy it, own it, be able to hold it in my hands. If I buy something ethereal I feel like I'm getting ripped off. Which is why I have so many CDs.

Plus there is the issue of corruption, and buy that I mean, your hard drive gets corrupted for whatever reason and you have to reinstall. Assuming you only backed up your data files, (if you backed up anything at all) you just lost the only copies of all your DLCs. I guess you can re-download it, but what if there is a server failure, or your Internet is down, or worse yet the company lost everything and the server no longer exists. Am I the only one who owns really old games? Do you really think Valve will still exist in 20 or 30 years? (I say Valve but that could apply to any company.) True it's unlikely you'll care at that point, but still. Plus, even if Valve exists, Steam might have shut down due to lack of interest. You remember Microsoft's Plays for Sure DRM? It required you to call a server to play your music. Guess what happened to the server.

I should really write a full blog post about this.
 

irishstormtrooper

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,365
0
0
Glefistus said:
But DLC is free!

Oh, you're talking about non-Valve games. Well, let me tell you, there is a reason I do not buy or play non-Valve games anymore.
Because you like waiting six years for a sequel to come out?

In all seriousness, though, I think most DLC is fairly priced. The Burnout: Paradise DLC, for example, opens up new cars, game modes, and even a new section of the map. In the end, though, it's all about your personal choice. If you want to spend the extra money, then go for it. If it's overpriced, then don't.
 

Medic Heavy

New member
Jul 4, 2008
240
0
0
I love paying full price for a game and having no money left over, then the next week they come out with a juicy piece of DLC that I can't afford, It's a blast!!!

If you can't tell I'm certainly not a fan for DLC, although I do buy it....
 

Over_Krill

New member
Nov 16, 2009
37
0
0
With games the price they are in australia 100 dollars RRP which is (100.00 AUD = 92.5260 USD) 92 US dollars that is the current exchange rate now i would have to say yes

-EDIT-
Also have to add some 360 and PS3 games retail for 120 dollars which is (120.00 AUD = 110.989 USD)the current exchange rate