If Bane cannot defeat Batman's sidekicks on their own then he's hardly a worthy adversary for Batman himself is he?Kolby Jack said:Every time Batman and Catwoman called each other "Bat" and "Cat" I wanted to eat that page. They said it like 4000 times. UGH. Not to mention Bane, who I usually am a fan of. He beats Robin, Red Hood, AND NIGHTWING, all off panel, and HANGS THEM. What the fuck, why not completely discredit the skills of three important characters? Fuck it! Why not have Bane break out of ice that Mr. Freeze calculated to be far more than Bane could ever break out of and only justify it with "because he's Bane" (literally, that's all we get). And then after Bane steamrolls basically the entire Batman roster, why not have Batman beat him by headbutting him and punching him a few times? Just because he's Batman!Kenbo Slice said:I think you and I have very different definitions of stellar. Because King's run is subpar as fuck so far.
Jesus that whole story was so poorly executed. And I really liked the Gotham and Gotham Girl stuff before it, minus Gotham somehow beating the entire Justice League off-panel. I guess that's a pattern: when King decides he wants to show how badass a character is but can't figure out how to logically portray them beating tough opponents, they just do it off-panel. Solid writing, that.
Robin, Red Hood and Nightwing all have their own ongoing series so if you really care how they're portrayed the you can read them but in Batman's title where they are all ancillary characters at best then yeah they can all be taken out off panel, that's all the purpose they serve In this story.