It has been answered: The chicken came first!

Recommended Videos

Andrecova

New member
Sep 24, 2009
83
0
0
Well, I'm sure most of you have at least once wondered about this old question, if it was the chicken or it's egg that came first.

Wonder no further, though, for the real answer has been found and disclosed by science: The chicken actually came first.

""It had long been suspected that the egg came first, but now we have the scientific proof that shows that in fact the chicken came first," Sheffield University's Dr Colin Freeman, according to a report in the Metro.

Researchers from Scotland and England used a supercomputer called HECToR to look in such detail at a chicken eggshell that they were able to determine the vital role of a protein used to kick-start the egg's formation.

That protein is only found, wait for it... inside a chicken.

Freeman, who worked on HECToR with counterparts at Edinburgh's Warwick University, said the protein had been identified earlier by scientists and was known to be linked to egg formation, "but by examining it closely we have been able to see how it controls the process," he added, describing it as a catalyst."

The only problem now is discovering how the chicken came to be in the first place, though.

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/07/14/tech/main6676542.shtml

So, does this goes for or against your previous thoughts about the question?

I'd personally never given it much of a thought, because when I did, I just found it inconclusive. Although I'd have gone with the chicken if I had to pick one from the start.
 

Last Bullet

New member
Apr 28, 2010
538
0
0
The correct answer is "T-Rex."

Hmm. Well, at least now I know. Also, I like how (following the link) they actually put quotations around "Scientific Proof."
 

Ridonculous_Ninja

New member
Apr 15, 2009
905
0
0
eggy32 said:
-Zen- said:
The egg came first.

Animals laid eggs long before chickens existed.

Your point is moot.
The question is "Did the chicken egg or the chicken come first?" Everyone knows other animals laid eggs before chickens. Stop being an idiot.
An animal that was almost a chicken laid an egg that had a chicken in it.

Therefore the egg came first. If the protein is only found in chickens now, that's because the almost chicken animal became the chicken.
 

Tele-screen

New member
Nov 23, 2009
77
0
0
It is as I have long suspected. However, at some point there was a chicken who was the first genetically complete modern chicken and he/she had to have come out of an egg birthed from a non-chicken. Then it becomes a matter of semantics: is it a chicken egg that it came out of? or a non-chicken egg?
 

RebelRising

New member
Jan 5, 2008
2,230
0
0
An animal that laid eggs eventually evolved into a chicken. I thought that was obvious. What am I missing here?
 

inFAMOUSCowZ

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,586
0
0
well i used common sense and said chicken. I mean how else would an egg survive with nothing to protect it/warm it.
 

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
Ridonculous_Ninja said:
eggy32 said:
-Zen- said:
The egg came first.

Animals laid eggs long before chickens existed.

Your point is moot.
The question is "Did the chicken egg or the chicken come first?" Everyone knows other animals laid eggs before chickens. Stop being an idiot.
An animal that was almost a chicken laid an egg that had a chicken in it.

Therefore the egg came first. If the protein is only found in chickens now, that's because the almost chicken animal became the chicken.
I'd like to thank you for (somewhat, if at all) defending my original statement, which was meant to be taken as a joke more than anything else. I'm curious if eggy32 and his 31 predecessors got that.
 

Zeromaeus

New member
Aug 19, 2009
3,533
0
0
Ridonculous_Ninja said:
eggy32 said:
-Zen- said:
The egg came first.

Animals laid eggs long before chickens existed.

Your point is moot.
The question is "Did the chicken egg or the chicken come first?" Everyone knows other animals laid eggs before chickens. Stop being an idiot.
An animal that was almost a chicken laid an egg that had a chicken in it.

Therefore the egg came first. If the protein is only found in chickens now, that's because the almost chicken animal became the chicken.
What he said.
 

Tattaglia

New member
Aug 12, 2008
1,445
0
0
Bah to your petty Egg/Chicken argument, steak will always be superior. Bah, I say!

Shian said:
Andrecova said:
Freeman, who worked on HECToR with counterparts at Edinburgh's Warwick University...
They got the first name wrong.
Epic first post.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
-Zen- said:
The egg came first.

Animals laid eggs long before chickens existed.

Your point is moot.
This is what I've known: Dinosaurs have laid eggs millions of years before the Chicken was even thought of. The Egg came first, not the chicken.
 

Daveman

has tits and is on fire
Jan 8, 2009
4,202
0
0
Surely an egg containing what is now known as a chicken came out of something very similar to but not quite a chicken. Hence the egg came first. That's what I always thought, seemed obvious.
 

team star pug

Senior Member
Sep 29, 2009
684
0
21
I thinks it's down to evolution. bird x is geneticly like a chicken, to the oint of being a few evolutionary steps off. bird x lays the egg, which would be called a bird x egg, and due to evolution a chicken comes out. In my opinion the chicken came before the CHICKEN EGG!

Stop making that lame "the egg came first because it was from like a dinosaur omg" joke, it's not funny.
 

Quaxar

New member
Sep 21, 2009
3,949
0
0
Ridonculous_Ninja said:
eggy32 said:
-Zen- said:
The egg came first.

Animals laid eggs long before chickens existed.

Your point is moot.
The question is "Did the chicken egg or the chicken come first?" Everyone knows other animals laid eggs before chickens. Stop being an idiot.
An animal that was almost a chicken laid an egg that had a chicken in it.

Therefore the egg came first. If the protein is only found in chickens now, that's because the almost chicken animal became the chicken.
I always use the same argument.

Now what's really interesting is to ask this a creationist. Since they don't believe in evolution that would mean the chicken now is the same way like it was when the world was created. A pitty we have no WBCs here.