J.J.Abrams plans to direct Portal and Half-Life films

Recommended Videos

Da Orky Man

Yeah, that's me
Apr 24, 2011
2,107
0
0
J.J. Abrams has a couple more franchises he wants to tackle.

The producer-director, who is busy wrapping up ?Star Trek? and tackling ?Star Wars? as his next tentpole, plans to work closely with Valve to adapt the games ?Half-Life? and ?Portal? into films, he told a gathering of videogame creators at the D.I.C.E. Conference in Las Vegas.

The projects are in early development through Bad Robot and Valve and not yet set up at a studio.

Abrams made the announcement with Valve Corp president and co-founder Gabe Newell during a keynote conversation kicking off the confab that focused on the storytelling differences between films and games.

Both creators agreed that there are elements of both forms of entertainment that connect with viewers and players in different ways and the two hoped to combine those as they move forward with the Valve adaptations.

The projects are just the latest in a growing list of videogame adaptations set up at studios. Others include ?Assassin?s Creed,? ?Tom Clancy?s Splinter Cell,? ?Need for Speed,? ?World of Warcraft,? ?Deus Ex,? ?Uncharted,? ?Mortal Kombat,? ?Asteroids,? ?Missile Command,? ?Spy Hunter,? ?Twisted Metal,? ?Mass Effect? and ?Hitman,? to name just a few.

?In many cases, games are better at telling stories than movies,? Abrams said, with gamers involved in steering the action, rather than acting as a passive viewer. But he added that there are times when ?players are often driving scenes in the wrong direction.?

Abrams pointed out ?Portal?s? slow reveal of its characters and plot as an innovative way to build a mystery.

?You start ?Portal? with no idea why you?re there,? he said ?The whole game is about figuring out the mystery and what?s going on. The more you play, the more you learn, the more you felt.?

Abrams and Newell used clips from ?Cloverfield,? ?Half-Life 2″ and ?Jaws? to prove their points, with Abrams also playing a scene from his first ?Star Trek? to reveal ?Star Wars?? R2-D2 floating in space in a field of debris.

Abrams revealed the robot as an example of giving audiences additional details to enjoy upon multiple viewings of a film.

?We often ask what things can we hide that people will find over time?? Abrams said.

Referring to Abrams? ?Star Wars? helming job, ?So I have to go back to your movies to see what movies you?re going to direct next?? Newell asked.

Newell cited Abrams? ?Cloverfield,? ?Alias? and ?Super 8″ as brilliant projects but was frustrated in ?Cloverfield? when the film?s monster first attacks New York City and a character with a camera records every step.

?I?m looking at that as a gamer and saying, put the fucking camera down and fucking run!? Newell said. ?Characters in movies don?t do what you want.? When playing a game, however, ?it?s our story,? he said. ?It?s about us and what we?re doing.?

Ultimately, interest in a movie or game will all come down to characters and their storylines.

?If you don?t care about the characters, nothing matters,? Abrams said.
Source:
http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/j-j-abrams-will-develop-half-life-portal-games-into-films-1118065765/

So then, any considerations? Given the reputation of video game movies, I suspect we ought to prepare for perfectly foreseeable consequences.
 

ToastiestZombie

Don't worry. Be happy!
Mar 21, 2011
3,691
0
0
I don't get why we need any of these movies. Either do a straight adaptation of the game and give it a new director's flair, or do nothing at all, because more often than not video game movies with original stories are like bad fan fiction or should be considered non-canon.

How exactly would one make a good adaptation of Portal? A game where the main character never speaks and half the time is spent doing puzzles. Half life is much the same. I think the only game series that would work as a movie if given to a competent director is the MGS series, but that would only be in a Harry Potter/LOTR-style adaptation.
 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
JJ Abrams needs to stay away from anything that geeks love and hold dear. The man confessed a complete lack of interest and knowledge in the Star Trek universe before tackling the films, and while they are fun action flicks, they're hardly of the same sort of tone and atmosphere as everything else in the Trek canon. I don't know if he's actually a Star Wars fan or not, but I hope that they replace him with someone who'll treat the the mythos with some reverence.
 

ToastiestZombie

Don't worry. Be happy!
Mar 21, 2011
3,691
0
0
Nigh Invulnerable said:
JJ Abrams needs to stay away from anything that geeks love and hold dear. The man confessed a complete lack of interest and knowledge in the Star Trek universe before tackling the films, and while they are fun action flicks, they're hardly of the same sort of tone and atmosphere as everything else in the Trek canon. I don't know if he's actually a Star Wars fan or not, but I hope that they replace him with someone who'll treat the the mythos with some reverence.
But who are you to say what the meaning of a "lack of interest" is! Just because he didn't memorize every single Wikipedia article on the klingons word by word doesn't mean he's not a Star Trek fan! Perhaps it's not him that needs to change to fit the Star Trek "universe", perhaps it's the people like you that hold on to your exclusive ideas! When will the oppression of multi-millionaire Hollywood film directors end?

/sarcasm

Nah, I agree. Why can't Hollywood get people who actually have a love for the source material... oh wait, it's because if they make it a fun action flick they get the actual fans going in and getting dissapointed and the non-fans going in.
 

Racecarlock

New member
Jul 10, 2010
2,497
0
0
Da Orky Man said:
?Mortal Kombat,?
Oh for fuck's sake, we didn't learn the last 3 times? Mortal kombat does not make good movies. Come on, guys.

On the other hand, this is a good sign the games industry should stop taking cues from hollywood. Games have become so profitable that hollywood is now envious of them. So stop with the fucking quicktime events already, guys!
 

Zeh Don

New member
Jul 27, 2008
486
0
0
Racecarlock said:
Mortal kombat does not make good movies. Come on, guys.
Sorry, but the original Mortal Kombat is a purely awesome film. So bad it's good applies, sure, but damn it man - the title track alone is better than other entire films.

Anyway, this just strikes me as people hitching onto a currently successful bandwagon. Abrams worked well with Star Trek, and to a lesser degree Start Trek 2, and essentially resurrected a dead franchise that many had simply written off.
So, people are throwing money at him now hoping to bring difficult properties to life.

We don't need a Portal Movie, because 90% of the game is about the mind bending puzzles. And a Half-Life movie wouldn't really work because even with someone like Hugh Laurie as Gordon Freeman, the moment he utters a word they've ruined the franchise.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,347
4,013
118
I'll bet you anything that if they ever make a Portal movie, it'll be about a group of racially diverse stereotypes who wake up in a diabolic test chamber and must escape the torture mazes with horrific results until Chell AKA Final Girl remains to confront whoever the fuck masterminded the experiment.

With lots of lens flare.
 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
ToastiestZombie said:
Nigh Invulnerable said:
JJ Abrams needs to stay away from anything that geeks love and hold dear. The man confessed a complete lack of interest and knowledge in the Star Trek universe before tackling the films, and while they are fun action flicks, they're hardly of the same sort of tone and atmosphere as everything else in the Trek canon. I don't know if he's actually a Star Wars fan or not, but I hope that they replace him with someone who'll treat the the mythos with some reverence.
But who are you to say what the meaning of a "lack of interest" is! Just because he didn't memorize every single Wikipedia article on the klingons word by word doesn't mean he's not a Star Trek fan! Perhaps it's not him that needs to change to fit the Star Trek "universe", perhaps it's the people like you that hold on to your exclusive ideas! When will the oppression of multi-millionaire Hollywood film directors end?

/sarcasm

Nah, I agree. Why can't Hollywood get people who actually have a love for the source material... oh wait, it's because if they make it a fun action flick they get the actual fans going in and getting dissapointed and the non-fans going in.
Yeah, the "lack of interest" comment I made should really have read "Was/is not a fan of Star Trek by his own admission". JJ is a great salesman, but a shoddy workman.

It is an unfortunate truth that Hollywood is only interested in the "safe" sorts of films, but it does make sense from a business perspective. Maybe people should do more low-budget films? Primer was made for like $7k or something like that.
 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
I'll bet you anything that if they ever make a Portal movie, it'll be about a group of racially diverse stereotypes who wake up in a diabolic test chamber and must escape the torture mazes with horrific results until Chell AKA Final Girl remains to confront whoever the fuck masterminded the experiment.

With lots of lens flare.
I quoted you more because I figured The Tick talking to Zim would be awesome. Also, I suspect your plot synopsis of a Portal film by Abrams is painfully spot on.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,347
4,013
118
Nigh Invulnerable said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
I'll bet you anything that if they ever make a Portal movie, it'll be about a group of racially diverse stereotypes who wake up in a diabolic test chamber and must escape the torture mazes with horrific results until Chell AKA Final Girl remains to confront whoever the fuck masterminded the experiment.

With lots of lens flare.
I quoted you more because I figured The Tick talking to Zim would be awesome. Also, I suspect your plot synopsis of a Portal film by Abrams is painfully spot on.
Hollywood is a harsh mistress.
 

Windcaler

New member
Nov 7, 2010
1,332
0
0
IMO portal would work better as a 15-30 minute short rather then a 3 hour "epic blockbuster" that Im sure he wants to do. Besides I dont really care of JJ abrams work. He has not done one film in the last five years that I enjoyed so I actually consider him to be a worse director them Michael bay but in the sense that Michael Bay's movies just arent for my demographic yet JJ Abrams is trying, and failing, to appeal to me with his various films.

That said, I dont think we need a film for either franchise. I just dont see how either would be better for having a feature length film that would just copy the stories of said games
 

uchytjes

New member
Mar 19, 2011
969
0
0
ToastiestZombie said:
I don't get why we need any of these movies. Either do a straight adaptation of the game and give it a new director's flair, or do nothing at all, because more often than not video game movies with original stories are like bad fan fiction or should be considered non-canon.

How exactly would one make a good adaptation of Portal? A game where the main character never speaks and half the time is spent doing puzzles. Half life is much the same. I think the only game series that would work as a movie if given to a competent director is the MGS series, but that would only be in a Harry Potter/LOTR-style adaptation.
For portal, I'd imagine something such as a "fall of Aperture" plot. It would be either about Ratman or some other scientist that was trying to survive GlaDOS's first attack. For Half-life, idk what they'd do. Also, a film adaptation of MGS would be hella interesting. I'd honestly like to see a film adaptation of the original Metal Gear Solid. For the sequel, I'd like to see it follow snake's journey through the Big Shell.

OT: Eh, I'm actually one of the people that have liked Abrams' films. I enjoyed both Star Trek movies (except for THOSE scenes in the second film) and I'm interested in what he'd do with the stuff.
 

uchytjes

New member
Mar 19, 2011
969
0
0
Windcaler said:
IMO portal would work better as a 15-30 minute short rather then a 3 hour "epic blockbuster" that Im sure he wants to do. Besides I dont really care of JJ abrams work. He has not done one film in the last five years that I enjoyed so I actually consider him to be a worse director them Michael bay but in the sense that Michael Bay's movies just arent for my demographic yet JJ Abrams is trying, and failing, to appeal to me with his various films.

That said, I dont think we need a film for either franchise. I just dont see how either would be better for having a feature length film that would just copy the stories of said games
Yeah, these wouldn't work as feature-length films. I'd honestly like to see some indie movie director make a 2-part portal/half-life double feature thats 1-2 hours long.
 

Bat Vader

Elite Member
Mar 11, 2009
4,997
2
41
Half-Life and Portal don't need movies though. If they do have to become films Valve should be the one to make them with their Source Filmmaker.
 

King of Asgaard

Vae Victis, Woe to the Conquered
Oct 31, 2011
1,926
0
0
J.J Abrams... to direct... Half-Life... a-an-and Portal....?
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,531
0
0
I do wonder how on earth will they make a Half Life movie, since it's protagonist is a silent one.

Now that my friends is the question.
 

Smiley Face

New member
Jan 17, 2012
704
0
0
Hm, interesting. I don't think that Half-Life could successfully be made into a film - I really can't for the life of me see how the silent protagonist angle would work, and how it would be Half-Life without it.

However, Portal could certainly, with the right approach, be made into an excellent movie. If it were solely based on the original game, it would have to be short to avoid being repetitive - test-chamber after test-chamber works for a game, not for film. However, if it adds new stuff, or draws from Portal 2, then it could be as long as it needed to be.

There would even be benefits to keeping the silent protagonist angle if they decided to go that way - if handled carefully, it would add an element of claustrophobia in the empty halls of Aperture Laboratories. With that said, I also don't think much would be lost in giving Chell a voice - Chell may never speak, but we imagine, or provide, an internal thought process, which needs to be shown on-screen - the important bit is that vocal interaction is limited, although I don't see how they'd avoid a speaking Chell pleading with GlaDOS.

Is JJ Abrams the right person to direct? I don't see it. His work on movies is all blockbuster, all flash, and while he can build mystery, he's made it clear his idea of the right thing to do with mystery is just to build it up and up to get the audience hooked - he doesn't actually care about putting the work in for it to resolve in a satisfying manner - which means it'll either be forgotten or bungled - which worked fine for LOST, but it won't for Portal. A Portal movie would have to have strong horror elements with a measured pace that I don't see Abrams having the patience for.