James Bond offically dead

Recommended Videos

shaboinkin

New member
Apr 13, 2008
691
0
0
Well, it's official now.

http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/07/james-bond-is-dead

MGM is currently $4 billion in debt and desperately seeking a buyer, meaning that the movies MGM owns the rights to are basically screwed. Their financial troubles have been a big factor in the delays with The Hobbit, and now the word is that they?ve killed Bond 23, kind of a shame since it was set to be directed by Sam Mendes from a script by Frost/Nixon?s Pete Morgan.

The movie has been axed ? and it could be years before the secret agent with a licence to kill is back on the big screen. A glum insider said: ?Members of the production crew have been told the Bond film has been canned.
Production company EON confirmed in a statement yesterday: ?We do not know when development will resume and cannot comment further at this stage.?
American TV company Spyglass Entertainment is the front-runner to take over but Summit Entertainment ? which makes the smash-hit Twilight vampire films starring Robert Pattinson ? is also understood to be in talks with creditors.
That?s the bad news. The good news is that lots of other Hollywood studios have plenty of money, meaning that the Magic 8-ball movie, the one where zoo animals give Kevin James dating advice, ?Hasbro Factory? ? those projects are all doing fine. And really, do we need another James Bond movie? I already got my secret-agent fix from Ashton Kutcher and Katherine Heigl.


If some other studio gets their hands on the franchise, for the love of god DON'T give it to Michael Bay...

Anyone sad, disappointing, [insert emotion here]? I know I am. I love the films (although I won't lie, I haven't seen the ones with Craig).
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
I'm disappointed. I liked Craig in the role, and if it takes years for someone to pick it up, he'll be to old to continue with Bond.
 

Matt_LRR

Unequivocal Fan Favorite
Nov 30, 2009
1,260
0
0
shame. Craig was really good, despite the mis-steps made in Quantum of Solace. Casino Royale was easily on par with Goldeneye.

-m
 

Jaywebbs

New member
Sep 24, 2009
600
0
0
meh, I honestly think my love of James Bond ended with Brosnan. Not that Craig is bad or anything, it's just that the character isn't the same.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Matt_LRR said:
shame. Craig was really good, despite the mis-steps made in Quantum of Solace. Casino Royale was easily on par with Goldeneye.

-m
What was wrong with Quantum of Solace?

OT: It's obviously not completely dead, but I do worry that Craig will not get the role again; he's my favourite by far.
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,683
0
0
Jaywebbs said:
meh, I honestly think my love of James Bond ended with Brosnan. Not that Craig is bad or anything, it's just that the character isn't the same.
They're closer to the novels and less family oriented, they're definitely not the same. At least this will free Craig up to do more works. I'd like to see him naked in a good comedy.
 

Living Contradiction

Clearly obfusticated
Nov 8, 2009
337
0
0
Bond isn't going to die with MGM. They gave it a good run but there's no way that he'll be leaving the silver screen without someone picking up the reins.

Heh. The guy survived six movie incarnations, eleven directors, five different authors, and sixty-seven years of peril. Believe me, he'll cope.
 

RatRace123

Elite Member
Dec 1, 2009
6,651
0
41
Damn, I liked Craig. I hoped he would at least get 3 movies in before the Bond torch was passed. No doubt the film series will be renewed in the future, but not with Craig as Bond.
 

Communist partisan

New member
Jan 24, 2009
1,858
0
0
Bond died than casino royale came out for me it was like somebody took james and broke all he's bones and than took him to the backyard and shot him whith a shotgun in the head.
 

shaboinkin

New member
Apr 13, 2008
691
0
0
Living Contradiction said:
Bond isn't going to die with MGM. They gave it a good run but there's no way that he'll be leaving the silver screen without someone picking up the reins.

Heh. The guy survived six movie incarnations, eleven directors, five different authors, and sixty-seven years of peril. Believe me, he'll cope.
Since MGM owns the rights to the movies it is dead if you look at it that way. Unless they do what the article said and sell it to some other studio, there won't be one for a long time. $4 billion debt...they have to make like 2 Avatar income generator movies
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
Hated Craig in the role (nothing actually against Craig, I just hated that they tried to make him like Bourne but British, it didn't work.) Sure you could argue that it was taking him back to the books, but Bond films haven't actually been that close to the books since Doctor No, (Doctor No being both the first Bond film I saw and the first Bond book I read, the book I read first, then saw the film.) The Bond films have always been a place for everyone's favourite campy superspy ultimate Brit hero, they are not the place for shaky-cam and gritty realism. Look at how much everyone hated the Timothy Dalton era the last time they tried to go gritty etc.

In fact, I think I've just cracked it. Last time they tried to make the films darker they utterly tanked and Bond was canned for nearly twenty years. They didn't learn from their mistake and he's been canned again.

So the solution as I see it is simple. Bring back the Bond Girls, bring back the Gadgets, for the love of God bring back some of that good old fahsioned one liner humour (it's called the Bond One-Liner on TVTropes for a reason after all) and let film Bond get back to film Bond's roots, because he has no business taking from the books anymore.

I do hope he comes back though, he was pretty much my first ever fictional hero at age 10 (I read Doctor No when I was young...)
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Woodsey said:
What was wrong with Quantum of Solace?

OT: It's obviously not completely dead, but I do worry that Craig will not get the role again; he's my favourite by far.
Poor story, ineffectual poorly defined bad guys, bad script, one good action sequence and then meh, dire theme tune, doubly dire when measured against the fantastic one Chris Cornell cam up with for Casino Royale.

It was missing the awesome action sequences like the two big jumps in Goldeneye or the construction site sequence in Casino Royal, it also seemed to have completely lost the sense of humour that was in Royale that helped the film along so well.

It also lost it's sense of identity, it desperately wanted to be a Bourne movie, It even used some of the same camera tricks and scene set ups as the Bourne movies do. But Bond is the polar opposite of Bourne, he is the agent with unlimited resources who hunts down and murders men like Bourne without question. Filming it like a Bourne movie was never going to work. Still, it was better than Die Another Day.

I am holding out for Clive Owen as Bond, he would be awesome.

Also, whatever the financial upheavels at MGM, one thing is certain.

James Bond will return...
 

Billion Backs

New member
Apr 20, 2010
1,431
0
0
Meh. I've never been too much of a James Bond movies fan.

Maybe they'll come up with another wise-cracking pun-fu wielding character... Just like every second action character these days. And yes, I'm aware that James Bond movies date quite a while back and that they may or may not have been one of the first to use that kind of characteristics for their protagonist.

I've watched about the third of all the movies, mostly the old ones - I think the newest one I've seen was that one with some kind of an ice castle, a giant laser, and super-tasers. Or some shit like that. The (movie) series were always a bit too campy for me, and not in a good way.
 

KaiRai

New member
Jun 2, 2008
2,145
0
0
I just couldn't get used to Craig being there as the switchover. Don't get me wrong, he's a good actor, I just never saw him as Bond material. He's just not as refined as Brosnan, or Roger Moore.
 

AwesomeExpress

Packages Delivered: 84 / 1900
Feb 4, 2010
13,692
0
0
I think that's too bad... Bond has been around for almost 40 years, it would be a shame to see it end like this. But at the same time, and despite what Matt said, I think Bond ended on a good note.
 

havoc_91

New member
Jun 17, 2010
31
0
0
thank you recession for removing the fail known as Daniel Craig from the awesome role of James Bond
 

Thunderhorse31

New member
Apr 22, 2009
1,818
0
0
That sucks, I was really looking forward to a Bond movie NOT directed by Marc Forster (QoS was a steaming shitpile), I guess I'll be waiting a long while to get that awful, awful taste out of my mouth. If Bond is dead, he certainly limped into that shallow grave of his.
 

SoloStoffe

New member
Apr 2, 2010
2,044
0
0
Bond hasn't been good since Craig got the job.

OR it may be decent since, if the popular theory that Bond isn't a person is true.