JK Reviews: The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (2011)

Recommended Videos

Julianking93

New member
May 16, 2009
14,715
0
0
I feel that something's amiss. It was there during my initial viewing and it's stuck with me through the second. A mixed feeling of disappointment and slight frustration that I don't quite understand. David Fincher, with such titles as Se7en, Zodiac, Fight Club and last year's magnificent The Social Network under his belt, a film of a similar caliber as The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo would seem right up his alley. Expectations where obviously high from its original announcement and, while there were the few skeptics, it was a movie that seemed unlikely to fail. But what do we get as the end result? A moderately decent adaption bringing all the story but none of the spark or grit.


The story surrounds high-profile and recently disgraced journalist Mikael Blomkvist (Daniel Craig) after a libel dispute that threatens his career. He is soon recruited by Henrik Vanger (Christopher Plummer), head business man to the wealthy industrial Vanger family, to investigate the over forty year old murder case of his great-niece, Harriet. Despite Blomkvist's initial hesitance towards accepting a seemingly lost cause, he eventually gives and agrees to do all he can in bringing Harriet's killer to justice. Blomkvist is repeatedly referred to as an "exceptional investigative journalist," leading to his employment by Henrik and Craig's brilliantly cold portrayal of the character makes this believable. While attempting to provide a fresh opinion on a presumedly hopeless case, the only person of which having faith being Henrik, he also is trying to escape the scandal of the media surrounding him.

On the other end of the spectrum is the 23 year old Lisbeth Salander (The Social Network's Rooney Mara), a rightfully frigid and distant elite hacker who makes her living by doing background checks on people for various clients. Many of which happily look the other way in the event of her actions proving less than legal. I say "rightfully frigid" before due to her heavily implied and obviously traumatic childhood, resulting in the requirement of a ward and continued supervision by growingly abusive government officials. Mara plays the part well enough and she will no doubt receive numerous nominations but it feels lacking in raw emotion in contrast to Noomi Rapace's original role as the character, something that I can't in good judgement blame on the actress (more on that later).

Watch me be all broodin' and shit.

Despite their outward differences, Blomkvist and Salander mirror each other well throughout the story. Both put a personal drive and reason into their search for a killer of women and that obsession only grows as the case becomes more gruesome. The film is nearly half over before their partnership begins, and before this point, the character development is replaced by fast paced editing aiming to keep the viewer's attention.

Soon after their introduction to one another, it isn't long before their "professional" relationship turns to something more but the problem with this is the extreme lack of reason. There's nothing to draw these characters together besides the fact that they're currently working with one another and there is seldom any chemistry between the two. This is brought on by the quick pace previously mentioned and despite its near three hour run time, there is a surprisingly low amount of character development that makes one feel for what's taking place on screen.

Fincher has been known as a perfectionist and one who claims to never repeat himself, but I feel here too much style has been brought over since The Social Network, explaining it's choppy editing and fast dialogue that doesn't seem to fit this narrative. Niels Arden Oplev's 2009 rendition of the story presented a far less confident film that brought out a raw, more realistic feel and while it's by no means bad to add your own touch to a beloved series, the wrong choice was made in the making of this particular film. What we have here boils down to an overzealous piece by an overly confident director. This isn't an insult, more as it is stating a fact. This type of attitude did nothing for the source material and only hindered the brilliant aspects of the film.

To its credit, the screenplay is top notch with Oscar winning writer Steven Zaillian, (Schindler's List, Moneyball, Gangs of New York) bringing a wonderfully composed script and I applaud the cinematography for it's beautifully bleak and desolate portrayal of the frozen Swedish setting but it's easy to see the direction is the weak link. The colourful cast of supporting characters bring a sense of dread and suspicion throughout, with particular mention to Stellan Skarsgard and Christopher Plummer who manages to put more emotion into his brief role than most actors. Credit shouldn't be taken away from our two leads either. In their own right, Craig and Mara deserve every bit of credit they receive but the sudden shifts in character without even the subtlest of explanations can't go unforgiven and that's without noting the unfaithful sways in story from the source material.


Though, admittedly, there's nothing wrong with
more Daniel Craig screentime.

Still, the film is without question, something that can only be described as an on screen page-turner and viewers who have yet to read the book or seen the previous films will undoubtedly be satisfied, albeit somewhat confused, by the whodunit aspects of the story. Being a huge fan of the original may have a hindering effect on my judgement but through the eyes of a first time viewer, my main gripes will be seen with the same amount of distaste as one with my similar personal prejudice.

My original skepticism unfortunately only proved accurate, due to possibly my own projected criticism but Fincher's work here seems to be an odd combination of not only uninspired and dispassionate but overconfident that simply doesn't work with the source material. What's worse is that the story here focuses less on Lisbeth and instead lets Daniel Craig's character take center stage throughout most of the picture.


The end result turns out as nothing short of adequate and satisfying to some but it does the preceding film no favours and its literary source no justice, especially considering its unnecessary changes to the story. The latter of which being the most disappointing. The overall character shifts and tonal differences in disposition don't fit and aren't explained, leaving the already convoluted plot that more unsatisfying in the end. Overall, however, Fincher's supposed "artistic vision" of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo will serve for some as a vast improvement over the original or to others as a disgrace to the series as a whole. I feel I fall somewhere between these two extreme categories. While it doesn't bring anything new to the already engrossing world created by Steig Larson in the first book, and in some cases hurts the feel of a previously invigorating tale, it will undoubtedly appease many moviegoers and fans of the series alike.



Movies:
Best Movies of the Decade [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.164045-Best-Films-of-the-Decade-Warning-Extremely-Long-Review] I Inception [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.215806-JK-Reviews-Inception] I Oldboy [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.236848-JK-Reviews-Oldboy] I Thirst [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.238393-JK-Reviews-Thirst] I Noroi [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.258713-JK-Reviews-Noroi] I Ghost in the Shell [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.264848-Poll-JK-Reviews-Ghost-in-the-Shell?view_results=1] I Top 25 Favourite Films [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.273264-JKs-Top-25-Favourite-Films#comment_form] I Kodomo no Jikan (series) [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.283845-JK-Reviews-Kodomo-No-Jikan] I Super 8 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.291002-JK-Reviews-Super-8]

Games:
Bayonetta [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.169030-JK-Reviews-Bayonetta-Warning-May-Contain-Spoilers] I Game of the Year 2009 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.163760-Celebration-for-My-5000th-post-Game-of-the-Year-awards] I God of War III [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.182952-JK-Reviews-God-of-War-III] I NieR [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.203204-JK-Reviews-NIER] I Castlevania: Lament of Innocence [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.206361-JK-Reviews-Castlevania-Lament-of-Innocence] I Maximo: Ghosts To Glory [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.212014-JK-Reviews-Maximo-Ghosts-To-Glory] I Kingdom Hearts [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.229506-As-Per-Request-JK-Reviews-Kingdom-Hearts] I Kingdom Hearts II [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.230725-As-Per-Request-JK-Reviews-Kingdom-Hearts-II] I Assassin's Creed Brotherhood [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.248762-JK-Reviews-Assassins-Creed-Brotherhood] I Top 12 Games of 2010 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.252471-JKs-Top-12-Best-Games-of-2010] I Bioshock [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.262110-As-Per-Request-JK-Reviews-Bioshock] I Fallout: New Vegas [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.266849-JK-Reviews-Fallout-New-Vegas] I Silent Hill 2 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.270928-As-Per-Request-JK-Reviews-Silent-Hill-2] I Dragon Age 2 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.276414-JK-Reviews-Dragon-Age-II] I Infamous2 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.300006-JK-Reviews-InFAMOUS-2#comment_form] I Catherine [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.312121-JK-Reviews-Catherine] I Deus Ex: Human Revolution [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.314275-JK-Reviews-Deus-Ex-Human-Revolution] I Dark Souls [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.319053-JK-Reviews-Dark-Souls] I Batman: Arkham City [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.324411-JK-Reviews-Batman-Arkham-City] I Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.329980-JK-Reviews-Call-of-Duty-Modern-Warfare-3]

Music:
Equilibrium's ReKreatur [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.204108-JK-Reviews-Equilibrium-ReKreatur] I Devin Townsend's Deconstruction & Ghost [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.307243-JK-Reviews-Devin-Townsend-Deconstruction-Ghost]


Remember, that I am now taking requests for reviews, so any suggestions for future reviews or lists you may have, please let me know via PM or in the replies to this review.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
I told you earlier that I was going to see this regardless of whether or not you really liked it. :p

Anyway, it was a good review. There were a couple of very minor errors that I noticed on first read, but nothing that was too distracting. (If you really want me to go through with a fine-tooth comb, I'll send you a PM after I sleep for the night.)

Also, on a slightly realated note, I finally bought the Dragon Tattoo trilogy a couple of days ago (for $20, as opposed to the $60 that it's supposed to be at). Before, I had just PVR'd them. Now I can see 'em all on DVD whenever!

My American Dragon Tattoo review will be up sometime next week, as that's when I'm going to see it (maybe tomorrow; we'll see).

EDIT: Also, I still maintain that Zodiac was crap.
 

KaWaiiTSuKI

New member
Feb 22, 2011
108
0
0
Marter said:
EDIT: Also, I still maintain that Zodiac was crap.
Hey, I liked Zodiac :[

Anyway, lovely review, Julie :3
I guess I'll stay away from this in that case but I'm still curious to see how they change up the story.
Getting angry at it is worth my $7 to me :p
Whatcha gonna review next though? Huh? Huh? :3
 

Julianking93

New member
May 16, 2009
14,715
0
0
Marter said:
I told you earlier that I was going to see this regardless of whether or not you really liked it. :p

Anyway, it was a good review. There were a couple of very minor errors that I noticed on first read, but nothing that was too distracting. (If you really want me to go through with a fine-tooth comb, I'll send you a PM after I sleep for the night.)
That you did! Like I said in the review, don't let me stop you from seeing it :p

And yeah, actually I"m interested in particular what you noticed as an error.
Might help me out next time I write :3

Also, damn you, I love Zodiac ;~;

Kawaiitsuki said:
Whatcha gonna review next though? Huh? Huh? :3
I still say go see it, if only for me to know your opinion and delight in your anger since I'm nearly positive you'll get pissy over it XD
As for what I'm gonna do next, probably a year end list of some kind.
Games, films, music. No clue. Maybe all three because I'm crazy like that. :3
will1182 said:
Nice review! I've been wanting to see this movie for a while, but having not read the book or seen the Swedish version, I probably won't notice or mind much of your (fair) criticisms. Anyway, good read!
Thanks for that! :D
I'd say watch both if you get a chance. If anything, the original first, then this remake.
I watched the Swedish film, then read the book and both are, in my opinion, more enjoyable than watching this one.
I do however realise that many people do not share that same sentiment. Lots of people think it's closer to source and that this is far superior but to each their own I suppose.
Curious to know what you might think about it though. Both this and the original! :3
 

Julianking93

New member
May 16, 2009
14,715
0
0
will1182 said:
Hey, on a side note, I actually went to see this last night. Really enjoyable movie, loved the plot. But I guess that's more a credit to the book than the movie itself.

I noticed the fast dialogue, it didn't really seem to fit. There were many times where I didn't catch what they said, and it wasn't because of the accents. And the choppy editing, too - dialogue would always start for the next scene while still in the previous scene, and the scene changes themselves were quite jarring.

Still, really liked it. Thanks for writing the review, it gave me a nice background going into the film!
Ah, well thank you for that! Or rather, you're welcome XD

Glad you ended up enjoying it, but like I said, check out the original Swedish version as well.
The dialogue is easier to get (since you actually read it), the transitions from scene to scene aren't anywhere near as jarring or ill fitting and people generally talk in a more collective, realistic manner.
Makes it a bit more believable than the people here talking as fast as they can. I get that's trying to make them sound intelligent but it breaks tension when things don't feel natural.

But yeah, I still ended up enjoying it to a certain extent and I'm glad you did too! ^_^
Just remember to watch the first one. :3
 

KaWaiiTSuKI

New member
Feb 22, 2011
108
0
0
Julianking93 said:
Ended up seeing it.
Almost completely agree with
will1182 said:
snips here
only I had a bit more rage going in since I've read the book.
Those changes to the original plot line... really pissed me off.
I know that sounds like I'm just a raving fangirl but the changes made no fucking sense.
Who the hell would believe Harriet would take Anita's identity?
That shit was just retarded.
The fact that in the original, she went to Australia, made much more sense.
Not only in the sense that no one would make the connection that "Hey, you kinda look like Harriet" but that she wanted to get as far away from her abusive family as possible.
Going to the complete opposite side of the world in order to do it, yet ending up in a similarly hostile and foreign world being the interesting irony of it.
Simply moving from Sweden to London didn't make much sense. You'd want to go to a place where they'd never find you.
Just my take anyway.