[Source: BBC News [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8282356.stm]]
I cannot believe that this was actually a valid concern amongst US politicians. How on earth did they manage to get elected?
Edit:
It seems that a lot of you have focused on the issue that she was up for an award in the first place. Well honestly, if you have managed to overlook the "encouraged witchcraft" part then I may have to spell out the main issue here:
a) Do you think the people responsible in taking away her honour had a valid claim by saying "she encouraged witchcraft" in her books.
b) Even if she was encouraging witchcraft (by some stretch) is it justifiable to deny someone of an honour/award because of their beliefs.
Or you know, you all can continue discussing the fact that she was not worthy of the award in the first place.
Looking back at the Bush era, I can't believe that all this happened only a few years ago. To accuse someone of "sorcery/witchcraft" is really keeping with the times, assuming of course we are in the middle ages.Harry Potter author JK Rowling missed out on a top honour because some US politicians believed she "encouraged witchcraft", it has been claimed.
Matt Latimer, former speech writer for President George W Bush, said that some members of his administration believed her books promoted sorcery.
As a result, she was never presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
The claims appear in Latimer's new book called Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor.
He wrote that "narrow thinking" led White House officials to object to giving Rowling the civilian honour.
The award acknowledges contributions to US national interest, world peace or cultural endeavours.
Past literary recipients of the award include John Steinbeck and Harper Lee.
Others denied the privilege under the Bush administration included Senator Edward Kennedy, who died in August this year.
Latimer claimed, in his book, that the veteran politician and health care activist was excluded because he was deemed to be too liberal.
I cannot believe that this was actually a valid concern amongst US politicians. How on earth did they manage to get elected?
Edit:
It seems that a lot of you have focused on the issue that she was up for an award in the first place. Well honestly, if you have managed to overlook the "encouraged witchcraft" part then I may have to spell out the main issue here:
a) Do you think the people responsible in taking away her honour had a valid claim by saying "she encouraged witchcraft" in her books.
b) Even if she was encouraging witchcraft (by some stretch) is it justifiable to deny someone of an honour/award because of their beliefs.
Or you know, you all can continue discussing the fact that she was not worthy of the award in the first place.