Left 4 Dead 2: A sequel worth the name?

Recommended Videos

Walking_Target

New member
Aug 18, 2009
42
0
0
Left 4 Dead 2, Valve?s much anticipated and somewhat controversial sequel to the award winning Left 4 Dead hit shelves about a week ago.

This game is classes as a ?co-op survival horror? just like the original. There?re still 4 survivors, just like the original. Your goal is still to get from point A to point B while hordes of Infected (I guess they?re not technically zombies...) try to get a nibble on your bum, just like the original. Sounds like not much has changed, right? Not really, the framework is the same but a lot of the details have changed.

The Special Infected have been updated, there are also new Special Infected. For those of you who have been living under a rock, the Special Infected are exactly what they sound like. They?re infected characters that have special abilities with which to harm you. You can also play these characters in Versus mode and in the new game mode Scavenge.
They?ve also updated ?climax? or ?Crescendo? events, now instead of hunkering down in a corner, you have to get from point A to point B or you?re toast because the Zombies just won?t stop coming. The new infected compliment this nicely.

In the last game, you had three special infected characters: Smoker, Boomer and Hunter. Alternatively: The one that pukes on you, the one that wants to tongue you and the one that jumps on you and pulls off your shirt.
They?ve added three more to the stable this time around. Charger, Spitter and Jockey. Alternatively, the one that tackles you the one that rides you and the one that (surprise, surprise) spits on you. Let?s talk about these changes for just a minute. One of the biggest complaints people had with Left 4 Dead was the lack of weapons and Special Infected. This concern was definitely addressed in the sequel. The variety is extremely welcome and in Versus mode, it no longer requires precision timing and a goddamned playbook to bring the opposing team down. This is because of the utility of the new SI, nothing does stupid amounts of damage, but it makes it easier to cause moderate amounts of damage and disrupt the other team. All in all, it balances out the survivors quite nicely. I think it is still possible to do something for the original; however I do not see any of the new infected ?fitting in? with the atmosphere of L4D which was a much creepier game.
There?s also ?uncommon-common? now. These are Infected that are not as powerful as the specials, but have some sort of special ability or resistance. Hazmat Uncommon are fire proof, Riot Cop infected are bullet proof in the front and Clowns cause common infected to follow them around. With the exception of Riot Cop infected, they are not much tougher than common infected, but they add another level of play and welcome complexity to the game.

Now, a word on the weapons: The new weapons are nice, the variety is nice. It is good to have the option of taking different weapons, even if the only difference is a slightly wider or narrower spread or just a different sound effect. Sounds crazy, but it keeps things fresh and far less monotonous. The big difference is in how weapons and items are handled. For starters, you can now replace your starting pistol with a melee weapon or a Magnum handgun, if you so choose. Some people complain that the melee weapons are overpowered and in some cases unrealistic. What these folks forget is that the melee weapons only work in a pretty narrow radius they?re powerful right up close and personal, they can?t do anything beyond that couple of feet. The chainsaw, perhaps the most overpowered weapon in the whole game has a limited supply of gas, so you can only use it for so long. Similarly, the Grenade Launcher, the ?Tier 3? weapon, has a very finite ammo supply. 30 grenades sounds like a lot, but it is not really; Especially when it has a dead zone of a few yards where the user takes damage if they shoot too close. There?s also Incendiary and Explosive ammo upgrades. These could be called overpowered if it weren?t for the fact that they are so severely limited. You have exactly one clip of explosive or incendiary ammo. Explosive ammo is even limited to a single slug with the shotguns.

Similarly, the ?Defibrillator? item is called overpowered as it allows the survivors to revive a dead comrade. This takes a few seconds and leaves the user entirely vulnerable, anybody who has played L4D on versus *knows* how bad a situation that is: Only two survivors who can effectively fight, one who is vulnerable and one who is dead? A decent team could cause good damage, if not kill all 3 pretty quickly.

The graphical improvements, specifically the gore models, are one of the big and noticeable changes. You have to compare L4D2 to its predecessor here: in L4D the model dismemberment was pretty straight forward: Cause enough damage to a leg, an arm or the head and it drops off or pops.
In L4D2 they have taken this model dismemberment or ?gore? to a whole new level. You shoot something in the chest at close range with a shotgun and half the chest blows apart. Shoot them in the face with a magnum? Parts of the head can disappear, not necessarily all of it. The groin shots will now literally blow their balls off. Maybe I?m possessed of a sick mind, but running up to a zombie and shooting it in the face with a Magnum is satisfying in ways I should probably talk to a therapist about. This also lends itself well to some ?oh shit!? moments. You see, unlike L4D, blowing an arm off, or even taking a chunk of torso or abdomen is not enough to kill zombies outright, especially on the harder difficulty settings. Sometimes you will shoot holes in a zombie and move on to the next target only to have the first one up in your face and swinging seconds later. This has to be one of the best changes that has been made.

I do have to say, overall, the game feels brighter and more colourful than L4D. Probably because some of the maps occur in daylight or around sunset. Sometimes it feels like a bad horror movie, but then again... isn?t that what they?re shooting for, to get some Zombie Movie into your co-op game?
In closing: This is a true sequel to L4D in name and spirit. It is different from the first in both feel and appearance. Just like the original, there is a plot, but it is very much a take it or leave it thing. You can read the safe room messages and listen to the dialogue between the survivors and it will fall together, but the plot isn?t being jammed down your throat either.

If I had to give it a rating, I?d give it an 83/100.

And with what some *other* developers have been doing? Yeah... Valve deserves some props for actually supporting their PC community from launch this time.
 

Walking_Target

New member
Aug 18, 2009
42
0
0
Oh, and to forestall the obvious. YES i was the leader of the boycott group. Yes i own L4D2.

Valve is a good company. They fumbled a bit on L4D/L4D2, but in the end they did right and will continue to do right.
 

Quadnike

New member
Feb 2, 2009
11
0
0
I didnt get it on the first day cuz i think that everything n l4d2 should of been n l4d1 :/
 

RobCoxxy

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,036
0
0
Quite liked hearing straight from the boycotter's mouth. I really enjoyed it, not a 10/10 game, but I'd give it a nine, for the fact that multiplayer is where the fun's at, and the game is basically just "what l4d1 could have had".

The inclusion of the l4d1 concept Special Infected "Spitter" was a nice touch, too.

Just a fun game, but you do feel that something is lacking. Probably due to there not being an ending movie or anything. Might have been a nice touch.... just seeing what happened to them. And I'd still like the next game to focus on the original characters, still feel closer to them than I do these guys.
 

WrongSprite

Resident Morrowind Fanboy
Aug 10, 2008
4,503
0
0
Quadnike said:
I didnt get it on the first day cuz i think that everything n l4d2 should of been n l4d1 :/
Five new campaigns? I'd like to see DLC larger than the original game.
 

Cherry Cola

Your daddy, your Rock'n'Rolla
Jun 26, 2009
11,940
0
0
I didn't know you could actually include an insult against IW in an L4D2 thread, but you did it... How original of you to insult them!
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
Walking_Target said:
Valve is a good company. They fumbled a bit on L4D/L4D2, but in the end they did right and will continue to do right.
And yet, no word on HL2E3.

WrongSprite said:
Five new campaigns? I'd like to see DLC larger than the original game.
In a time long past, there used to be total conversion mods of games available.
 

Walking_Target

New member
Aug 18, 2009
42
0
0
HUBILUB said:
I didn't know you could actually include an insult against IW in an L4D2 thread, but you did it... How original of you to insult them!
I just work with the material they give me.

Considering I can't get a MW2 game with a ping under 200, Valve has done right by me and IW has not. End of Story.
 

Walking_Target

New member
Aug 18, 2009
42
0
0
Left4Meds said:
Just to be honest, as soon as I saw your name, I almost skipped the review, but looking at your 2nd post in the thread I actually read through it to see what your thought.

So seeing as you 'like' the game. Anything changing in the Boycott Group?
Nope, nope and nope. I'm not in charge any more, haven't been for over a month now ;)
 

Left4Meds

New member
Jul 9, 2009
415
0
0
Walking_Target said:
Left4Meds said:
Just to be honest, as soon as I saw your name, I almost skipped the review, but looking at your 2nd post in the thread I actually read through it to see what your thought.

So seeing as you 'like' the game. Anything changing in the Boycott Group?
Nope, nope and nope. I'm not in charge any more, haven't been for over a month now ;)
Good to hear, but, then what's with the icon avatar...
 

Dr.Sean

New member
Apr 5, 2009
788
0
0
Has anyone else noticed the sexual innuendo in the spitter? I mean, it dresses like a tramp and it spits acid and it's called a spitter... This felt like the best thread to say it in.
 

Phoenix Arrow

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,377
0
0
Quadnike said:
I didnt get it on the first day cuz i think that everything n l4d2 should of been n l4d1 :/
Err.
How?
Let me check how big it is quickly... 7GB. That's bigger than the total harddrive capacity of the computer I had ten years ago. How can that be in a free update? Do you have any idea how much effort and money it takes to make a game like that? Obviously not.
 

ADDLibrarian

New member
May 25, 2008
398
0
0
What made me get it when it first came out was that leaked opening movie. Somehow that got me just super excited about it, and even on my dying compy, it's wonderful. Melee weapons are satisfying, environments expansive, boss battles epic, characters interesting. Valve did it again.
 

Quadnike

New member
Feb 2, 2009
11
0
0
Phoenix Arrow said:
Quadnike said:
I didnt get it on the first day cuz i think that everything n l4d2 should of been n l4d1 :/
Err.
How?
Let me check how big it is quickly... 7GB. That's bigger than the total harddrive capacity of the computer I had ten years ago. How can that be in a free update? Do you have any idea how much effort and money it takes to make a game like that? Obviously not.
Did i say DLC?no i didnt,i said everything in L4D2 should of been L4D1 and i didnt say released as DLC.