Mangod said:
Not saying that you're wrong, but can you give me a quote on that?
The quote within the game occurs on Zerus, after Kerrigan becomes the primal queen of blades. It occurs if you speak to Zurvan after the event:
Zurvan: And are you the equal of Amon, who once controlled you?
Kerrigan: He never controlled me. I felt...an influence. A trace of something dark, but long gone. Amon must have died before I was infested.
Mangod said:
And I still don't see how this doesn't count as some form of mind control - she's controlled by the Overmind in SCI, yes, but if Kerrigan wasn't influenced/controlled by Amon, shouldn't she have turned back into Kerrigan 1.0 when the Overmind bit the dust?
Either Kerrigan was in full control of herself when she told Jim "I like what I am." in which case, purging her of the Zerg in WoL shouldn't have caused her personality to make a 180, or she wasn't, in which case she's being made to act against her own best interest by an outside force, i.e. mind control?
Kerrigan was never controlled by the Overmind. Even SC1/BW makes this apparent, and SC2 builds on it that her being independent is the entire reason for her existence in infested form. So, Kerrigan is in control of herself when she tells Jim tha she likes what she is, but to use the analogy, this is "Kerrigan 2.0" talking. Kerrigan in HotS is Kerrigan "3.0," so to speak, with plenty of darkness within her. That darkess existed as far back as "Kerrigan 1.0," so to speak.
Since it's something that's come up, I'll take this time to address it. I can understand the idea that people might not like Kerrigan being redeemed if they follow the logic that there's no personality divide at all between Sarah Louise Kerrigan, Terran Ghost, and Sarah Kerrigan, the Queen of Blades. SC1 and BW don't really outright state anything against this, as a lot of BW Kerrigan's actions are based on avenging transgressions done to her past self (e.g. she tells Mengsk that a lot of what she's done is payback for New Gettysburg). However, even back then, I would have disagreed with this interpretation, based on the following:
-Sarah Kerrigan did terrible things, but always regretted them (e.g. killing Mengsk's family). Throughout the terran campaign of SC1, she calls Mengsk out on his genocidal actions, even if she holds onto the hope that it's for a better tomorrow. You don't go from a person like that to the Queen ***** of the Universe without either a) heavy character development, or b) severe character change.
-It's definitively a case of the latter in my mind. She's put inside a chrysalis, infested, allowed to keep her sapience, but still altered on the biological level that, in my mind, even back then, is the main catalyst for changes on the psychological level. Everything that Kerrigan does in SC1/BW can be attributed to a combination of zerg influence and her old persona. Because without doubt, elements of the old persona remain - a zerg thrall has no reason to seek revenge - but Sarah Kerrigan, the terran, wasn't genocidal or sadistic.
-Which, brings us to the question of Amon. Indications are that Amon's influence (exerted through the zerg mutagen in her system) begins to occur at the end of Brood War. She gets the sense of a hollow victory, and senses the looming threat he presents. Four years later, and she's become fatalistic. Chances are you're going to do worse in a battle you believe you're fated to lose than in believing that you might actually win.
Fun fact, her hero page on SC2 does both confirm and deny this, the quote being
Soon after her ascension, the death of the Overmind left a power vacuum in the Swarm. The ensuing Brood War saw Kerrigan defeating foe after foe, and she even turned on old allies like Jim Raynor. When the conflict ended, she was in full control of the zerg.
"Or so she believed, for a dark influence, with twisted plans for the zerg and the galaxy, crept into her thoughts, exerting its will through her zerg mutagens?Kerrigan could not resist. She quietly prepared the Swarm until the Dark Voice commanded her to claim a powerful xel'naga artifact. She obeyed."
Now, that Amon directs her to retrieve the artifact doesn't make any sense within WoL itself (why would Duran foil her), within HotS (where she claims that she was never controlled), or in an interview that occurred between WoL and HotS, where it was stated that her reason for seeking the Keystone was to use it as a weapon. But even then, it does make a clear distinction between Brood War Kerrigan and post-Brood War Kerrigan.
So, anyway, I can understand why people like "Queen *****" Kerrigan more than her later incarnations. Certainly I loved her as a villain back then. But I don't feel that SC2 negates her characterization in those games. Everything she does in SC1 and BW is of her own volition. A form of volition brought on by zerg infestation, but her volition nonetheless.