Mass Effect: Where does the series go now sequel-wise?

Recommended Videos

Infernai

New member
Apr 14, 2009
2,605
0
0
Ok, yes, Mass effect 3's ending was seven flavors of terrible to almost all of the human population that played it. Yes, it has been discussed to absolute death and i am sure almost all members of this forum are cringing just as the title was read. BUT, while the ending of that game is going to factor into this i am going to be asking about something a bit different here:

Now that Mass Effect 3 is concluded, where does it go from here if we were to make another sequel?

It's been established that Bioware continues to do some more stuff with the universe. Mass Effect 3 was the end of SHEPARDS story after all (A very confusing, contrived and out of place ending involving god children..) so this still means that the game series is likely intended to continue.

I sort of envision a Mass Effect 4 likely being set in a very damaged and near death galaxy no matter what choices are picked: Destroy would have sent most of the galaxy back to the dark ages and the loss of communication with all races. Control likely didn't last and, despite Shepards strong will, the reapers gradually start to come back to resume the cycle. Synthesis has meant a merging of synthetic and organic life, but it hasn't been intergrated as properly as anticipated: People are dying in all races due to complications en mass as most bodies find it impossible to adapt to such a rapid change. By this point, the details about the catalyst and Sheps interaction are well known to many and nobody is happy.

Basically, the main protagonist of this game may be some kind of survivor of the earth battle or someone else entirely who, through a chance meeting with an archeologist discovers information about another race that was revered by the Protheans (Aka. They were to the Protheans, what the protheans were to the universe in ME). Through some cryptic hints, it is discovered they had made some form of supposedly unfinished time travel device but the co-ordinates for it are scattered around the galaxy on different planets. So, the main protagonist goes through to find it to try and undo the damage done to the universe and possibly even save their own future as well.
So, game is played, old party members are seen worse for ware yadda yadda bla bla. Eventually, main character goes back and depending on factors either: A) Goes back, manages to convince Shepard the Catalyst is bad. The force is redirected to citadel and the Citadel is blown up. B) Shepard naturally doesn't believe them, despite best attempts and things look like they're about to play out the same way again despite main characters attempts. This time though, the main character, at the last minute, manages to save shep from the beam and, with dying breath imparts instructions to destroy the catalyst. Shepard, moved by this goes through with it. C) Complete cock up, main character actually thought of as indoctrinated and is shot out of the sky and killed before they can even do anything to stop it.

So, escapists, what do you think should probably happen if they were to make a sequel to Mass Effect 3? Or, more accurately, where do you think they can go from here?
 

distortedreality

New member
May 2, 2011
1,132
0
0
I'd be doing prequels, since there's an absolute shit ton of great lore there. I wouldn't even think of doing anything post ME3 for at least a few years.
 

TheLizardKing

New member
May 4, 2012
131
0
0
Mass Effect: The Prequel Trilogy. We all know how this turns out.

They couldn't do any sequels because they destroyed pretty much everything with their lazy writing.
 

irmasterlol

New member
Apr 11, 2012
178
0
0
You know what I say? Let it end. Everyone will remember it so much more fondly if they stop it before it shits all over itself and dies. They told the story they wanted to tell. After this, I would accuse any Mass effect games of being a cash grab.
 

Emiscary

New member
Sep 7, 2008
990
0
0
Hell, ideally. The series murdered it's own appeal with that bullshit ending, so why the hell would anyone invest more in a sequel?

I'm already familiar with the stock tropes of sci-fi and over the shoulder shooters. I don't need more generic space operas with the letters ME lovingly stamped on the box to reacquaint me with them.
 

Proverbial Jon

Not evil, just mildly malevolent
Nov 10, 2009
2,093
0
0
There's no way they could pull off any sort of satisfactory sequel unless they literally retconned their own terrible ending or set it about a million years after the events of ME3. Even that would mean a drastically different world and would negate the entire point of calling it a Mass Effect game.

Anyway, with sooo many different endings(!) to ME3, how would they possibly continue the story AND keep all the fans happy? After all, Bioware know exactly what their fans want... /bitterness

Nah, a prequel game of some sort is most likely. There's a literal butt-ton of lore ripe for the picking.
 

Thandran

New member
Feb 19, 2011
183
0
0
If the ending was good I'd gladly buy a ME game about the reconstruction of the galaxy.

But as it is... the ME franchise won't get any more money from me. I still have taste ash in my mouth due to the ending.

They had such great potential... *sigh*
 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,864
0
0
I would rather see a spin-off set in the ME universe than a sequel.

I've mentioned this already but maybe a FPS where you play as a merc for the Blue Suns or Eclipse, doing missions primarily out in the Terminus Systems but with forays in to other systems. No cover based shooting, just you and your merc squad going up against other mercs, C-Sec, private security, whatever. It could take place during Shepard's two year absence between ME and ME2 that way, no one's worried about the Geth anymore or about the Collectors and Reapers yet.
 

Zaik

New member
Jul 20, 2009
2,077
0
0
Considering that the best case scenario seems to be(i thought?) that Shepard destroyed everything electronic, including the mass relays, i'm not really sure where you can go now unless it was supposed to be a prequel set on one of the notable events like the first contact war, rachni war, krogan rebellions, etc.
 

The Forces of Chaos

New member
Mar 25, 2010
289
0
0
irmasterlol said:
You know what I say? Let it end. Everyone will remember it so much more fondly if they stop it before it shits all over itself and dies. They told the story they wanted to tell. After this, I would accuse any Mass effect games of being a cash grab.
I?m going to have to disagree with you a bit irmasterlol. Not that I'm saying your wrong, but I consider Mass effect 3 as a huge cash grab given that they replaced the dark energy plot with some kind of synthetics plot which runs counter to its very name. Also the cut content and Mass Effect 2 crew reduced to cameos and the plot holes.

For me the series is pretty dead and that?s sad. And even if they do a prequel, who?s gonna go though that again just to receive disappointment.
 

number2301

New member
Apr 27, 2008
836
0
0
The Forces of Chaos said:
irmasterlol said:
You know what I say? Let it end. Everyone will remember it so much more fondly if they stop it before it shits all over itself and dies. They told the story they wanted to tell. After this, I would accuse any Mass effect games of being a cash grab.
I?m going to have to disagree with you a bit irmasterlol. Not that I'm saying your wrong, but I consider Mass effect 3 as a huge cash grab given that they replaced the dark energy plot with some kind of synthetics plot which runs counter to its very name. Also the cut content and Mass Effect 2 crew reduced to cameos and the plot holes.

For me the series is pretty dead and that?s sad. And even if they do a prequel, who?s gonna go though that again just to receive disappointment.
Yeah pretty much this. EA's dark tendrils could be felt throughout ME3 and appear to have seriously damaged the end product.

Only one thing will come from this, EA will bleed the corpse of what could have been the high watermark of gaming dry with some shitty shooter.

Maybe that's a bit over the top, maybe we'll get a worthy prequel or sequel, I just can't see it.
 

Amaror

New member
Apr 15, 2011
1,509
0
0
I think it will be like the fourth pirates of the caribean movie.
There will be a sequel, but i just don't care.
 

Lt._nefarious

New member
Apr 11, 2012
1,285
0
0
I think just start a new trilogy with all new, or possibly one old, characters that takes place alongside the original 3 and and end them just before the events of ME3's ending...
 

Da Orky Man

Yeah, that's me
Apr 24, 2011
2,107
0
0
I'd quite like an FPS set in the First Contact War. Or maybe an RTS in the Krogan Rebellions.
 

Quijiboh

New member
Mar 24, 2011
97
0
0
I think it's most likely to be pre-, rather than post-Shepard's story. With the destruction of the mass relays, the series loses some of its most iconic imagery and a lot of the romance of the setting. A rebuilding the galaxy story could potentially make a good game, but I don't think they'd be able to successfully market it.

I think that's what bothered me most about the ending, seeing all the potential same-universe-new-story sequels go out the window because hanging out in a galaxy without the relays just seems like much less fun...
 

nathan-dts

New member
Jun 18, 2008
1,538
0
0
Zaik said:
Considering that the best case scenario seems to be(i thought?) that Shepard destroyed everything electronic, including the mass relays, i'm not really sure where you can go now unless it was supposed to be a prequel set on one of the notable events like the first contact war, rachni war, krogan rebellions, etc.
The indoctrination theory is very solid. I think it's safe to assume that Mass Effect 3 ended just before getting to the Citadel teleporter. The endings in regards to all the electronics being fried didn't happen given the ending. That said I still feel that there can't be a threat worse than the reapers and continuing forward chronologically would be a mistake.

Previous wars do seem most likely, but they would be way too boring; Humans fighting Turians, Krogan fighting Rachni, Salarians and Turians fighting Krogan. Way too boring. The main reason Mass Effect 1 through 3 were so good was the multi-species teams you established which you don't really get early in the lore.

Personally, I'd like them to kill the series, any and all anticipation for more Mass Effect was killed by the ending.
 

Riddle78

New member
Jan 19, 2010
1,104
0
0
I'd actually like to see a game on the First Contact War,as well as one about the Morning War. We're done with Shepard,so let's look at the OTHER major conflicts in the universe. Maybe the Rachni Wars or Krogan Rebellions?
 

Random berk

New member
Sep 1, 2010
9,636
0
0
Goofguy said:
I would rather see a spin-off set in the ME universe than a sequel.

I've mentioned this already but maybe a FPS where you play as a merc for the Blue Suns or Eclipse, doing missions primarily out in the Terminus Systems but with forays in to other systems. No cover based shooting, just you and your merc squad going up against other mercs, C-Sec, private security, whatever. It could take place during Shepard's two year absence between ME and ME2 that way, no one's worried about the Geth anymore or about the Collectors and Reapers yet.
That sounds disturbingly like Call of Duty in Space.

No, if any new games are to be even remotely related to Mass Effect then they'd have to be based on either the memorable characters of the series, or the major events like the Morning war, or the Krogan rebellions, etc. Also, I wouldn't mind playing a game with some bit of stealth in it, with Thane as the protagonist. Some of the others like Garrus, Wrex or even Samara also have backstories that could make a decent game, maybe.
 

JWRosser

New member
Jul 4, 2006
1,366
0
0
There's a hell of a lot of lore to play with, but I think that a game set before the Shepard saga (though not necessarily a direct prequel - just set in the same universe) would be good.

My friend and I were discussing how well an RTS could work, seeing as you've got tons of factions to play with. Although I think that a few non-citadel races would have to merge teams, but it could definitely work.