Well, it's the same thing as the 9/11 "missing". Authorities can't legally come out with it, too much potential civil liability.The thing that bothers me about the coverage, and I know they can't be to blatant but...there are not 1,300 people missing. They're not going to turn up, they didn't wander off and get lost in the woods. The Governor of Hawaii was on MSNBC last night talking about how the fire was moving with 60 msph wind, so a mile a minute, and got to almost 1000 degrees. Those missing people are dead, and they're ash, if that.
And I know they can't say that without finding some evidence, but acting as if there is a chance these people will show up...its not right. Be honest.
Also what a horrific tragedy and loss of life.
Global warmin' ain't real, y'all. Pretty interesting how, after a year or two of "low" carbon emissions due to global Covid lockdowns, we get back to "normal" and the climate immediately goes haywire. Clearly the answer is more convict labor to fight mass wildfires.The horribly ironic tragedy is that while some parts of the world burned, other had a month of incessant rain.
People must have short memoriesGlobal warmin' ain't real, y'all. Pretty interesting how, after a year or two of "low" carbon emissions due to global Covid lockdowns, we get back to "normal" and the climate immediately goes haywire. Clearly the answer is more convict labor to fight mass wildfires.
The really sinister and terrifying thing is, that, our atmospheric response to carbon output is delayed by a decade, so this particular heat wave is from what we were putting out in 2013, and it's only increased since then.Pretty interesting how, after a year or two of "low" carbon emissions due to global Covid lockdowns, we get back to "normal" and the climate immediately goes haywire.
There's a high likelihood that a substantial number of those 1300 are people who haven't contacted the authorities yet to let the authorities know they made it out.The thing that bothers me about the coverage, and I know they can't be to blatant but...there are not 1,300 people missing. They're not going to turn up, they didn't wander off and get lost in the woods. The Governor of Hawaii was on MSNBC last night talking about how the fire was moving with 60 msph wind, so a mile a minute, and got to almost 1000 degrees. Those missing people are dead, and they're ash, if that.
Republicans be like, "ain't nothin' wrong", while driving their Hummer up to a burning stand of ancient, endangered trees, and lighting their cigar out the window before cutting a donut and peeling out while furiously masturbating to cuck porn.People must have short memories
Hey, at least the metric shitload of jet fuel the Navy spilled is dilute enough by now the water won't be flammable, too. Silver linings!The fact that the people of Hawaii aren't going to every Exxon, and BP gas station, and straight up just rioting is a testament to the temperament of the people of Hawaii.
You think a substantial number? After all these days, literally thousands of journalists on the island looking for any story, and not one noticed all those missing people just over there, just out of frame, just chilling?There's a high likelihood that a substantial number of those 1300 are people who haven't contacted the authorities yet to let the authorities know they made it out.
How would they know just by looking at someone if they are one of the people in the 1,300 missing number? I daresay Ag3ma is right, that a lot of them will be found to be alive.You think a substantial number? After all these days, literally thousands of journalists on the island looking for any story, and not one noticed all those missing people just over there, just out of frame, just chilling?
Imagine a town of 5,000 people. The authorities notionally know where they all live, but not whether they are actually there or not at any one time. A disaster strikes and destroys the town. How do the authorities know who was in the town and who was not when it was destroyed? To a large extent, they can only know who was spared when those people tell the authorities that they're not dead.You think a substantial number? After all these days, literally thousands of journalists on the island looking for any story, and not one noticed all those missing people just over there, just out of frame, just chilling?
I'm glad you brought up 9/11 as a good example. How many missing during that attack? About 500 in the days after.Imagine a town of 5,000 people. The authorities notionally know where they all live, but not whether they are actually there or not at any one time. A disaster strikes and destroys the town. How do the authorities know who was in the town and who was not when it was destroyed? To a large extent, they can only know who was spared when those people tell the authorities that they're not dead.
Some people may not be able to tell the authorities, some may not realise they should, some possibly don't want to or can't be bothered, and some may even have gone away and not be aware their town was destroyed and that they'd be advised to let the authorities know they're okay.
In fact, you don't even need hypotheticals. A year after 9/11 they were still turning up the odd person who had been listed as missing. Similarly, they likely will never identify everyone who died in the 9/11 attacks either.
Yeah, but they were two large buildings in a city that still had functioning power and communication networks, so it was much quicker and easier for people to make contact. Just give it time.I'm glad you brought up 9/11 as a good example. How many missing during that attack? About 500 in the days after.
In the fullness of time, how many turned up alive?
Oh I am. And believe me, I want to be wrong. I want every single person found, alive and safe, eating a nice steak dinner having just adopted a puppy.Yeah, but they were two large buildings in a city that still had functioning power and communication networks, so it was much quicker and easier for people to make contact. Just give it time.
And of course there’s dodgy people who, allowing no good crisis to go to waste, might use the opportunity to engage in a little identity remaking.Imagine a town of 5,000 people. The authorities notionally know where they all live, but not whether they are actually there or not at any one time. A disaster strikes and destroys the town. How do the authorities know who was in the town and who was not when it was destroyed? To a large extent, they can only know who was spared when those people tell the authorities that they're not dead.
Some people may not be able to tell the authorities, some may not realise they should, some possibly don't want to or can't be bothered, and some may even have gone away and not be aware their town was destroyed and that they'd be advised to let the authorities know they're okay.
In fact, you don't even need hypotheticals. A year after 9/11 they were still turning up the odd person who had been listed as missing. Similarly, they likely will never identify everyone who died in the 9/11 attacks either.
Is this an established common phenomenon?And of course there’s dodgy people who, allowing no good crisis to go to waste, might use the opportunity to engage in a little identity remaking.
I doubt very much it’s common. And even among those who attempt it, in the days of biometric records and global data cross referencing it’s becoming harder and harder to pull off.Is this an established common phenomenon?