Stupid grin from ear to ear, brother.Soopy said:When I read the title, I thought it might be a cynical reference to the departure of Don Mattrick, to Zynga...
......What?Players' reputation will grow over time if they don't accrue complaints, but Lavin said it might also include things like participating in Xbox Live Rewards, which incentivizes renewing your Xbox Live Gold membership, buying games on the Xbox Live Marketplace, or referring friends
Pay2Grief?Bellvedere said:The opportunity for griefing is pretty lame and added to that you can acquire positive rep points by renewing your XBL sub?
......What?Players' reputation will grow over time if they don't accrue complaints, but Lavin said it might also include things like participating in Xbox Live Rewards, which incentivizes renewing your Xbox Live Gold membership, buying games on the Xbox Live Marketplace, or referring friends
Sir, if you've never experienced a similar system before, you should not jump to conclusions. I assure you, the rating bot does not give a rats ass about who put the report in. There are so many other games and even forums with similar systems and it ended up catastrophically bad in almost all cases.cloroxbb said:If you actual read about it, a "band" of trolls muting you, wont have any effect because the system supposedly also looks at who mutes you, and when etc... So when they see that it was a group of people playing together, or are friends, etc... It may not be possible for them to "corrupt" the system. Of course it is all well and good, in theory, but we shall see when people actually start playing...
The moderators make the final call in only the cases that involve a perm ban. In all other instances- it's entirely automated.Jandau said:Reputation systems only work if there is considerable oversight and a number of failsafes. For instance, LoL has a solid system in the Tribunal (not perfect, but robust and solid), where players report others, then once a sufficient number of reports has been accrued that player is forwarded to the Tribunal. There, other players get to review cases at random, each case consisting of stats and chat logs for a number of games that player participated in. Finally, if enough players decide that the accused deserves punishment, it is then forwarded to a moderator who makes the final call.
Except he wasn't. In that particular game, he played an unconventional build of a not-too-great champion for the first time (his own words) in a Ranked game. I can totally understand why his team was less than thrilled. Also, you don't get banned for one game. Ever. You can't. You had to have been reported by multiple people for a number of games. I've done a decent number of Tribunal cases and I've never seen a case with less than 4 games that that person was reported for, usually, 6-7 games were listed.5ilver said:The moderators make the final call in only the cases that involve a perm ban. In all other instances- it's entirely automated.Jandau said:Reputation systems only work if there is considerable oversight and a number of failsafes. For instance, LoL has a solid system in the Tribunal (not perfect, but robust and solid), where players report others, then once a sufficient number of reports has been accrued that player is forwarded to the Tribunal. There, other players get to review cases at random, each case consisting of stats and chat logs for a number of games that player participated in. Finally, if enough players decide that the accused deserves punishment, it is then forwarded to a moderator who makes the final call.
And to give an alternate opinion on The League Tribunal- it is absolutely the worst rep system I've ever seen or been a part of. You can get suspended for days or even weeks without even breaking a single rule. To give an example: A person recently got banned because he was playing Mordekaiser as a jungler.
More info: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35658688