Well, I will go so far as to say that "The Last Airbender" at least had some very nice FX and some decent choreography at times. If you had to argue this in reverse and instead of saying "which sucks more" started argueing which movie is better, and had more redeeming qualities, "The Last Airbender" would win, and thus deserves the victory here for sucking less. As the debate points out, in DBZ's movie, they blow the whole deal with the hero using his trademark power/yell out. Even the Green Lantern movie got the basic oath right (which is part of the awesome of Green Lantern for the fans), and this just failed utterly. When the guys do their trademark moves and bend elements in "The Last Airbender" it at least looks pretty good in most cases, maybe not exactly as you'd envision it would look in real life from the cartoon, but still some reasonably solid FX and you can't say that they didn't do the powers that defined the characters too badly even if everything else was... lacking. I think part of "The Last Airbender"'s problem was simply that they decided to put all their money into FX and carry it as an FX movie, and spent very little time on the characters or actual storyline. The biggest fail of the movie was that it was intended to be part of a trilogy, I could see a mess if they were trying to force the entire series into a two hour block, but when they want 3 movies to begin with and plan for it, there was no excuse for it. I mean they did "Lord Of the Rings" with 3 movies and no offense, that had a lot more going on and more fans than "The Last Airbender".