While this is true, just because an anti-consumer practice has been present in Nintendo's games for a long time doesn't mean they shouldn't be called out for it still being present.CaitSeith said:It's the same as usual.
why exactly is sharing a town with the other people that use your switch such a problem though?Avnger said:While this is true, just because an anti-consumer practice has been present in Nintendo's games for a long time doesn't mean they shouldn't be called out for it still being present.CaitSeith said:It's the same as usual.
The ability to share a town is not the problem, that you are locked to 1 town per console is the problem.Yoshi178 said:why exactly is sharing a town with the other people that use your switch such a problem though?Avnger said:While this is true, just because an anti-consumer practice has been present in Nintendo's games for a long time doesn't mean they shouldn't be called out for it still being present.CaitSeith said:It's the same as usual.
you can even do 4 player local multiplayer this time...
they're all literally the same island though.bluegate said:The ability to share a town is not the problem, that you are locked to 1 town per console is the problem.Yoshi178 said:why exactly is sharing a town with the other people that use your switch such a problem though?Avnger said:While this is true, just because an anti-consumer practice has been present in Nintendo's games for a long time doesn't mean they shouldn't be called out for it still being present.CaitSeith said:It's the same as usual.
you can even do 4 player local multiplayer this time...
At least allow for 1 town per user profile and give people the option of "sharing it" on the console or keeping it private.
Anti-consumer? Aren't you jumping to conclusions there?Avnger said:While this is true, just because an anti-consumer practice has been present in Nintendo's games for a long time doesn't mean they shouldn't be called out for it still being present.CaitSeith said:It's the same as usual.
I'd say it's taking it too far to call it that. But it is pretty dumb and limiting the player needlessly.CaitSeith said:Anti-consumer? Aren't you jumping to conclusions there?Avnger said:While this is true, just because an anti-consumer practice has been present in Nintendo's games for a long time doesn't mean they shouldn't be called out for it still being present.CaitSeith said:It's the same as usual.
Animal Crossing has always tried to keep the player from cheating for the sake of the experience. Even in the gamecube version, it nagged the players when they reset the game without saving.Elfgore said:I'd say it's taking it too far to call it that. But it is pretty dumb and limiting the player needlessly.