PETA does it again: Unhappy Meals!

Recommended Videos

Titanguy654

New member
Jul 14, 2009
713
0
0
http://www.mccruelty.com/unhappyMeal.aspx


DAMN YOU PETA! DAMN YOU TO HELL!

Seriously tough, why? Why do this, PETA? You realize that there are more pressing issues at hand, like dealing with retard PSA makers.

Edit: ooh, a video? Let's watch, shall we?

http://www.mccruelty.com/default.aspx

Edit Edit:

http://www.fox23news.com/news/local/story/Unhappy-Meals/urPSh2vPH024usbJv2W3-Q.cspx

Now we have a news article! Oh, wait. It Fox, do never mind.
 

LongAndShort

I'm pretty good. Yourself?
May 11, 2009
2,376
0
0
PETA can go fuck itself. Do they realize that every time they do this they just turn more people against them? there are better ways to protest, shock doesn't always work.
 

NotAPie

New member
Jan 19, 2009
2,095
0
0
UN happy meals.
Awesome.
But I don't agree...I don't care how its made just as long as it feeds me.
 

Dusty Donuts

New member
Jul 16, 2009
928
0
0
We have better things to worry about than how chickens are killed. And besides, it's not exactly like the chickens will protest for long.
 

Emphraim

New member
Mar 27, 2009
831
0
0
That kind of shock advertising would just scare people away from the organization rather than get anyone to actually take it seriously. All of these advertisements ignore the fact that PETA kills lots of animals yearly.
 

Borrowed Time

New member
Jun 29, 2009
469
0
0
:Le sigh: Not surprising in the least honestly. I'm completely over this stuff. If PETA wants to keep destroying any semblance of respect that the general public has for them then more power to them.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Because there's obviously nothing wrong with Controlled Atmosphere Killing, as they suggest.
Would you rather go quickly or be asphyxiated?

PETA reminds me of the little pekinese dogs that just sit there and yap constantly without doing a damn thing about anything, while their owners feed them prime steak.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
Awww, here I was hoping there was meat in it. Meat always tastes better with fear throughout the tasty flesh!
 

Borrowed Time

New member
Jun 29, 2009
469
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Because there's obviously nothing wrong with Controlled Atmosphere Killing, as they suggest.
Would you rather go quickly or be asphyxiated?

PETA reminds me of the little pekinese dogs that just sit there and yap constantly without doing a damn thing about anything, while their owners feed them prime steak.
Oh sheez, my Uncle raised those little crappers. Constant eye poppage. :shudder: Hated them with a passion.
 

Titanguy654

New member
Jul 14, 2009
713
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Because there's obviously nothing wrong with Controlled Atmosphere Killing, as they suggest.
Would you rather go quickly or be asphyxiated?

PETA reminds me of the little pekinese dogs that just sit there and yap constantly without doing a damn thing about anything, while their owners feed them prime steak.
Erm.....that actually makes no sense.
 

DirkGently

New member
Oct 22, 2008
966
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Because there's obviously nothing wrong with Controlled Atmosphere Killing, as they suggest.
Would you rather go quickly or be asphyxiated?

PETA reminds me of the little pekinese dogs that just sit there and yap constantly without doing a damn thing about anything, while their owners feed them prime steak.
I love how so many PETA supporters protest animal shelters that put down animals, but PETA puts down piles of them every year. Or how they're against any product developed through animal testing, but one of their VP's is diabetic and needs insulin to live. Hypocrisy, hilarious hypocrisy.
 

leviathanmisha

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,305
0
0
IdealistCommi said:
*sigh* This makes me want to walk by their local HQ with KFC.......again.
I'll join, but I'll bring the McDonald's! And I'll make sure it's Chicken Nuggets...you know, it taste good for being tortured...
 

Woem

New member
May 28, 2009
2,878
0
0
I don't see why this action would result in even more PETA hate. They have a good point:

In the slaughterhouses of McDonald's U.S. and Canadian chicken suppliers, birds are dumped out of their transport crates and hung upside-down in metal shackles, which often results in broken bones, extreme bruising, and hemorrhaging. Workers have the opportunity to abuse live birds, and birds have their throats cut while they are still conscious. Many birds are immersed in tanks of scalding-hot water while they are still alive and able to feel pain.

McDonald's has the ability to end these abuses.

There is a less cruel method of chicken slaughter available to McDonald's suppliers called controlled-atmosphere killing, or CAK, and it would cost the corporation nothing to demand that its suppliers use it. CAK would eliminate the worst abuses currently suffered by chickens killed for McDonald's. In fact, a 2005 study about CAK produced by McDonald's concluded that it is far better for animals than the current method of slaughter.
So they want a quick and clean way to kill animals instead of having them suffer so long before being killed. Is that really such a bad cause? They're not asking McDonalds to close down all their stores and they're not asking people to stop visiting McDonalds. So I really have a hard time understanding the "DAMN YOU PETA!" and "PETA can go fuck itself" reactions.
 

Titanguy654

New member
Jul 14, 2009
713
0
0
woem said:
I don't see why this action would result in even more PETA hate. They have a good point:

In the slaughterhouses of McDonald's U.S. and Canadian chicken suppliers, birds are dumped out of their transport crates and hung upside-down in metal shackles, which often results in broken bones, extreme bruising, and hemorrhaging. Workers have the opportunity to abuse live birds, and birds have their throats cut while they are still conscious. Many birds are immersed in tanks of scalding-hot water while they are still alive and able to feel pain.

McDonald's has the ability to end these abuses.

There is a less cruel method of chicken slaughter available to McDonald's suppliers called controlled-atmosphere killing, or CAK, and it would cost the corporation nothing to demand that its suppliers use it. CAK would eliminate the worst abuses currently suffered by chickens killed for McDonald's. In fact, a 2005 study about CAK produced by McDonald's concluded that it is far better for animals than the current method of slaughter.
So they want a quick and clean way to kill animals instead of having them suffer so long before being killed. Is that really such a bad cause? They're not asking McDonalds to close down all their stores and they're not asking people to stop visiting McDonalds. So I really have a hard time understanding the "DAMN YOU PETA!" and "PETA can go fuck itself" reactions.
You clearly missed the pointless random pictures of bloody chickens.
 

SnowCold

New member
Oct 1, 2008
1,546
0
0
I'm not even angry about the fact that they are doing it, I'm just pissed of about them not doing it atleast funny or creative.