Deffinitley wrong! PS3 was launched in UK march 2007. Machine isn't even 3 years old in the UKGilbert Munch said:
Playstation 4
- Thread starter iggyus
- Start date
Recommended Videos
What year do you think we live in? 2009 - 2006 = 3 years not six man. OH WAIT!!! do you mean that by the time they release the PS4 6 years will have passed? Cause that makes sense.iggyus said:
There we go.iggyus said:
Flamezdudes said:
Though I will agree that backwards compatibility is a good thing, what I will say is that Microsoft is fine with this generation. Right now the company that is, or at least should be, looking at a new console is Nintendo. Right now they should worry about saturation in the market. Microsoft will most likely need to put out a console around 2013, perhaps 2014. Nintendo should look into 2011, early 2012.
I'm acually kind of glad that they're taking away the cell proccessor. Don't get me wrong the thing is great but its a bit ahead of its time for it to be used much. If they put in a cell proccecor in say 5-10 years then that would be better because companies will have had more experience with it.
Either way, a PS4 shouldnt be realesed in 2012, tats just too early, realese it in 2014-2015 and perfect the console.
Either way, a PS4 shouldnt be realesed in 2012, tats just too early, realese it in 2014-2015 and perfect the console.
Nooooo. I don't want the new consoles to come out for a good few years yet. I say the PS3 will be the top Sony console until 2014/2015.
Nah it's only been out for about three.Ciarang said:
And now I laugh at you console fanboys...you spent $500 on your PS3 the second it was released. You waited out in the freezing cold. And now you have to do it again while I sit in my cozy computer room spending $150 to upgrade my graphics card every two years.
Ha. Haha. Hahaha.
Oh, I hadn't heard that about FFXIII. It will be nice to see the ps3 use its power to a further extent than has been seen recently. Although, gameplay is first and foremost in my mind.Jaranja said:
OT: I could see the PS3 lasting for at least another 4 years. And yeah, sony needs to concentrate on others things that are currently sub-par like psn. I would like to see the ps3 reach the same height as the ps2, if that's even possible. I can dream, can't I?
pfft pile of crap really.
They're losing money on the PS3 as it is, Like hell if they're making a new one.
I mean they haven't even started to be honest.
They're losing money on the PS3 as it is, Like hell if they're making a new one.
I mean they haven't even started to be honest.
A bit of rabbid, insecure fanboyism a few posts up there ehh? ^
Anyway, it's been out for three years, and Sony want it to last for around ten years. So no. Plus the PS3 has just started picking up steam. It flat out sucked at first but now look at this year and what it has next year.
Anyway, it's been out for three years, and Sony want it to last for around ten years. So no. Plus the PS3 has just started picking up steam. It flat out sucked at first but now look at this year and what it has next year.
whew much better!TheLoveRat said:
personally, i don't mean to be butting in here with 360 vs PS3 rhetoric, but I think a new revision of the 360 would be marketable much sooner than the PS3. The PS3 has ample power and the open processor structure means that the pixel shaders and other rendering technology can continue to improve on the PS3 without new hardware hitting the market. On the other hand, the 360 is stuck with DirectX 9 technology and all the same video card technology that was available in 2005. I think the 360 could do with a second revision release that improves some things like shadow rendering and generally improved framerates on everything that isn't MW2 or Forza 3.
Probably a bit too soon what with all the new gubbinz coming out for the PS3.
I always wondered why next gen consoles manage to be released about the same time, is it because they can only reach into the future to pull back technology and ideas when all three of the companies come together or just wild coincidence?
And is the new Xbox really going to be called the 720?
I always wondered why next gen consoles manage to be released about the same time, is it because they can only reach into the future to pull back technology and ideas when all three of the companies come together or just wild coincidence?
And is the new Xbox really going to be called the 720?
I dont think there will be any new consoles out for awhile now- theres so much potential in the systems already in place now. That new hardware isnt always needed. Plus, the cross-platform market is incredibly profitable now.
MS and Sony especially aren't always making money off of every console they sell- MS has hardware problems, still- and Sony still sells their consoles at a loss.
If anything, I think the only new console we could see from the Big Three anytime soon would be a Wii HD peripheral or some kind of upgrade to HD. Though even that seems unlikely to be a total hardware overhaul from Nintendo
MS and Sony especially aren't always making money off of every console they sell- MS has hardware problems, still- and Sony still sells their consoles at a loss.
If anything, I think the only new console we could see from the Big Three anytime soon would be a Wii HD peripheral or some kind of upgrade to HD. Though even that seems unlikely to be a total hardware overhaul from Nintendo
