As do I.Naheal said:I pray that this isn't an honest question.
But we already know one of the results.Manicotti said:The birth of each is an independent event. For simplicity's sake, it's the same as flipping a coin, and we're being asked the chance that we're getting two of a kind. 50% per result for each of 2 results = .5 * .5 = 25% chance that the results will be the same.
You could look at it from that angle, and then it would be 50%. But I just looked it as "what is the chance of getting this particular outcome?" that outcome being double boys.D4zZ said:But we already know one of the results.
No, henry had the same chances as anyone else. He was just unlucky.D4zZ said:I take it the chances of the babys sex isn't determined by any sort of genetic hand-me-downs, biology isn't my strong point.
Some couples have more of a chance of getting a boy for example? Henry the VIII didn't have this, my mate has about 6 sisters as well, or are these just coincidences?
actually, that has nothing to do with it. It's simple statistics. Past results have no effect on future outcomes.D4zZ said:But we already know one of the results.Manicotti said:The birth of each is an independent event. For simplicity's sake, it's the same as flipping a coin, and we're being asked the chance that we're getting two of a kind. 50% per result for each of 2 results = .5 * .5 = 25% chance that the results will be the same.
And the difference between "Boy Girl" and "Girl Boy" is...heyheysg said:It's variable probablity, but I'm not sure the question is phrased right,
The oldest kid is a boy?
anyway
Boy Boy is in
Boy Girl is in
Girl Girl is out
Girl Boy is in
So it's 33%
If you ever meet a boygirl or a girlboy late at night you'll know...Debatra said:And the difference between "Boy Girl" and "Girl Boy" is...heyheysg said:It's variable probablity, but I'm not sure the question is phrased right,
The oldest kid is a boy?
anyway
Boy Boy is in
Boy Girl is in
Girl Girl is out
Girl Boy is in
So it's 33%