For those of you who have finish the game, even those of you have not, do you believe that Assassin's creed 3 should be set in the future, or past and is it worth getting after AC 2.
It goes way further back than that I thought, like since the begining of recorded history far.orangeapples said:I don't think Assassin's Creed could be set in the future. the Animus only shows the actions of Desmond's ancestors, right? So how could it show the actions of his descendants?
*I have only played AC1.
I think the Renaissance is the latest they could place the game, because after that, guns are in use, and everyone knows that assassinations with guns are just not as cool as assassinations with hidden blades and swords and other low tech devices.
I'd put AC3 during the Roman Empire or at least during the Bronze Age. The creed could go that far back.
Space Spoons said:I think Ubisoft Montreal should focus on making sure the inevitable sequel doesn't feel like as much of a giant chore as the first two, first of all.
I don't own the game because it's a rehash of the original. Do you see how that works?Kermi said:Space Spoons said:I think Ubisoft Montreal should focus on making sure the inevitable sequel doesn't feel like as much of a giant chore as the first two, first of all.![]()
Good thing your opinion is informed, or I might question it's validity.
Assassin's Creed is set in the not-too-distant future. AC2 explores the idea of a bleed effect, in which Desmond can gain the abilities of an assassin by reliving his ancestor's memories.orangeapples said:I don't think Assassin's Creed could be set in the future. the Animus only shows the actions of Desmond's ancestors, right? So how could it show the actions of his descendants?
You don't own it because you THINK it's a rehash of the original.Space Spoons said:I don't own the game because it's a rehash of the original. Do you see how that works?
I point to my original comment, which inferred that not having played the game your comments can hardly be considered a reasonable assessment of what the game offers.Space Spoons said:I don't own the game because it's a rehash of the original. Do you see how that works?Kermi said:Space Spoons said:I think Ubisoft Montreal should focus on making sure the inevitable sequel doesn't feel like as much of a giant chore as the first two, first of all.![]()
Good thing your opinion is informed, or I might question it's validity.
Saying AC2 is a rehash of AC1 is like saying Half life is a rehash of wolfenstein 3d, it makes no senseSpace Spoons said:I don't own the game because it's a rehash of the original. Do you see how that works?Kermi said:Space Spoons said:I think Ubisoft Montreal should focus on making sure the inevitable sequel doesn't feel like as much of a giant chore as the first two, first of all.![]()
Good thing your opinion is informed, or I might question it's validity.
Yes, that's generally the idea behind an opinion.Kubanator said:You don't own it because you THINK it's a rehash of the original.Space Spoons said:I don't own the game because it's a rehash of the original. Do you see how that works?